Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for October 29th, 2011

Gov. Mead Comments on Wolf Plan Headed to 2012 Legislature

Posted in Wolf Current Events on October 29, 2011| 3 Comments »


 **Send your comments to Governor Mead at: http://governor.wy.gov/contactUs/Pages/default.aspx right away!

Fri 10/28/2011

“In a release from his office Friday, Gov. Matt Mead commented on the upcoming legislative session – specifically on the next step in the state being handed back management of wolves.

Mead says he hopes the legislature takes action in line with statutes to the Dept. of Interior agreement.

Gov. Mead was responsible for drawing up the original plan with U.S. Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service published a proposed de-listing rule for wolves in Wyoming earlier this month. Under the plan, 90% of the state would be a “predator zone” where wolves could be shot on site.

The plan requires Wyoming to maintain a population of 100 wolves and at least 10 breeding pair outside of Yellowstone National Park and the Wind River Indian Reservation. The plan also implements a flex zone for northern Sublette and Lincoln counties, as well as southern Teton County that would protect wolves in that area from October 15th until the end of the following February.

If no major changes occur and the plan receives final approval next year, the Wyoming Game and Fish would like to begin quota managed hunting in the fall of 2012.”

**Special thanks to Sheridan Media Staff, http://www.sheridanmedia.com/news/gov-mead-comments-wolf-plan-headed-2012-legislature20891, for providing this information.

Read Full Post »

6 Things You Should Know about Wolves

Posted in Facts and Figures on October 29, 2011| 1 Comment »


  • “You stand a better chance of being struck by lightening than being killed by a wolf.
    In general, wolves fear humans and do not approach them. In fact, very few incidents involving wolves attacking humans have occurred in North America. Those rare occurrences were reportedly caused because wolves associated humans as a source for food like garbage or scraps, or because a wolf was likely reacting to the presence of dogs (McNay 2002). To prevent conflicts with wildlife, people must act responsibly by never feeding or approaching wild animals or take other actions that cause wild animals to lose fear of humans. Learn more about coexisting with carnivores.
  • Wolves and large grazing animals lived side-by-side for tens of thousands of years before the first settlers arrived.
    Recent studies on Yellowstone elk and wolves have found that weather and hunter harvest affect elk declines more than wolf predation. In fact, wolves often enhance prey populations by culling weak and sick animals from the gene pool, leaving only the strongest animals to reproduce. Food availability and weather regulate wolf populations. When their prey is scarce, wolves suffer too. They breed less frequently, have fewer litters, and may even starve to death.
  • Wildlife tourism is a major part of the economic base of the northern Rockies.
    For instance, in the counties around Yellowstone National Park , livestock production accounts for less than 4% of personal income, while tourism-related industries account for more than 50%. Moreover the effect of wolves on the livestock industry as a whole is negligible, with wolves accounting for less than 1% of livestock losses.
  • In portions of the northern Rockies and Southwest, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) designated wolves as “experimental, nonessential” populations.
    This special designation gave landowners a limited right to kill wolves caught in the act of preying on livestock on private property and increased the ability of FWS to remove or destroy problem wolves. Since 1978, wolves, listed as threatened in Minnesota, have been managed under a special regulation that controls individuals that kill livestock and pets.
  • According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, very few land use restrictions have proven necessary to facilitate wolf recovery in Montana and Minnesota.
    The service reports that land use restrictions are necessary only if illegal mortality of wolves occurs at high levels.
  • Numerous polls taken throughout the United States consistently demonstrate that more people support wolf recovery than oppose it.
    In fact, a 2002 quantitative summary of human attitudes towards wolves found that 61% of the general population samples had positive attitudes towards wolves.”

    Works Cited: McNay, Mark E. A Case History of Wolf-Human Encounters in Alaska and Canada. 2002. Alaska Department of Fish and Game. Wildlife Technical Bulletin 13

**Special thanks to “Defenders of Wildlife” for providing this information! (http://www.defenders.org/programs_and_policy/wildlife_conservation/imperiled_species/wolves/wolf_facts/index.php)

 

Read Full Post »