Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for June, 2012


Well my wolf friends, here is a bit of good news in light of all the bad scenarios happening for wolves right now.

“A “puppy” picked up by campers in Idaho last month turned out to be a wolf. Since no wolf pack could be found to return it to, the pup is now headed for Busch Gardens in Virginia, which has experience raising wolves in captivity.

By The Spokesman-Review

A lost wolf pup left Boise Wednesday morning on its way to a new home and family in Virginia.

Idaho Fish and Game officials selected Busch Gardens in Williamsburg, Va., from a list of potential facilities willing to accept the wolf.

Last month, out-of-town campers picked up what they thought was a lost domestic puppy outside Ketchum and took it to a vet clinic in town. Officials thought the male puppy looked like it might be a wolf. A DNA test proved them right — it is a wild wolf, but no pack was found in the area.

Zoo Boise took care of the pup while a list of facilities accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums that would be suitable for the pup was compiled.

Busch Gardens was chosen for several reasons, officials said. It has had wolves for more than 12 years, and recently received two 6-week-old pups. The National Zoo sends its staffers there to get captive-wolf training.

Busch Gardens also has been active in Mexican wolf recovery, and it sponsors a fund that has contributed more than $10 million worldwide to wildlife conservation.”

Read Full Post »


Article by: DOUG SMITH, Star Tribune

  • Updated: June 22, 2012 – 9:25 AM

Critics call methodology flawed. DNR says the hunt is on.

“About 80 percent of the more than 7,000 people responding to an online survey by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) opposed a wolf hunting and trapping season.

But the results won’t stop this fall’s planned wolf season.

The question of whether to have a season was resolved by the Legislature, said Dennis Simon, DNR wildlife chief. “It was a public input process, it wasn’t a poll. … The Legislature and governor directed us to have a wolf season. So we will have a season.”

The DNR’s survey, which was not limited to Minnesota residents, closed Wednesday after accepting public comments for a month. The agency received 7,351 responses — 1,542 people supported a wolf season, 5,809 opposed it.

“Frankly, I’m not a bit surprised,” said Howard Goldman, senior Minnesota director of the Humane Society of the United States, which opposes the wolf hunting-trapping season.

Mark Johnson, executive director of the Minnesota Deer Hunters Association, which supports the wolf season, said the survey is flawed and doesn’t reflect public opinion in northern Minnesota.

“I took the survey, and it didn’t ask where you live,” said Johnson. “It’s totally unscientific. What’s the use of it when it’s not limited to Minnesotans? I’d say zip.”

Simon said it’s uncertain whether the DNR will be able to determine how many comments came from outside Minnesota. “It was wide open — anyone could go on the site and take it,” he said.

Goldman said his group did not encourage out-of-state anti-hunting groups to take the DNR’s online survey. “I thought it should reflect the opinions of Minnesotans,” he said.

Nancy Gibson, co-founder of the International Wolf Center in Ely, said the results clearly indicate the public is still divided on the question of a wolf hunt, even if the survey was hijacked by anti-hunting groups. “It’s a surprise to me,” she said of the number who responded, and the overwhelming anti-hunting sentiment they expressed.

Both Johnson and Goldman had wanted the DNR to hold public meetings around the state, which the DNR decided not to do, citing time constraints.

Simon said the agency had hoped to get public reaction to the specific wolf hunting proposals. The agency will analyze those comments and release details of the survey next week.

The DNR also plans to finalize the wolf hunting rules next week, Simon said, so that the regulations can be included in the DNR’s hunting and trapping season regulation handbook.

The proposal was to split the season into two parts, an early hunting-only season, beginning Nov. 3, to coincide with the firearms deer season and a late one, Nov. 24 to Jan. 6, that would permit trapping and hunting. DNR officials have suggested the season would close if a 400-wolf quota is reached. Simon wouldn’t say whether the final rules will deviate from those proposals.”

Staff writer Josephine Marcotty contributed to this report. Doug Smith • 612-673-7667

Read Full Post »


THIS DELISTING PLAN IS NOT “SCIENTIFIC BASED!”  Please read and provide your comments.

This article was written by Steve Waters, June 14th, 2012 | 7:02 PM, at SunSentinal.com:

“The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in March affirmed the constitutionality of Congress’ removal of wolves from the federal endangered species list. The deadline to appeal that decision passed quietly this week with no action from animal rights and anti-hunting groups.

Attorneys representing the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation said that means the case will not advance to the U.S. Supreme Court, and that the litigation has ended in favor of science-based, state-regulated management and control of wolves.

“A lawsuit that began in 2011 in Judge Donald Molloy’s courtroom in Missoula, Mont., following the Congressional delisting is finally over — and conservation has prevailed,” said David Allen, RMEF president and CEO. “No appeals paperwork had been filed by end of the day on June 12, so the Ninth Circuit’s decision is absolutely final.”

Allen said RMEF applauds the development because it helps clear the way for continued work to balance wolf populations with other wildlife and human needs.

Attorneys representing RMEF and other conservation groups in the Ninth Circuit hearing had presented oral arguments supporting the Congressional action.

RMEF has pledged to continue to fight wolf lawsuits and support delisting legislation at both federal and state levels.”

Read Full Post »


Special thanks to “Wolf Warriors (howlingforjustice.wordpress.com) for providing the news article below!

June 2, 2012

“Little wolf pups are emerging from their dens in Idaho’s Lolo and Selway zones where the wolf hunt IS ONGOING, stretching into June. Lactating alpha mothers and their pups are sitting ducks for “hunters”, lambs to the slaughter. So in this context I read the moving story of the little wolf pup who was found by campers last weekend in the Sawtooth National Forest. They assumed he was a lost puppy and called the cops who advised them to take him to a vet, where it was determined this was probably a little six-week old wolf pup. A DNA test was done, the results are pending.

There are many unanswered question surrounding this little guy, was his mother poached? Did the pack move to a rendezvous site, leaving him behind accidentally? Of course we’ll never know. It seems unlikely a wolf mother would leave her little one behind, wolves adore their babies.

There’s a search on for his natal pack so he can be reunited with them, which becomes increasingly remote with each passing day.

“field technicians with the Wood River Wolf Project and Fish and Game have been scouring the area near where the pup was found since Sunday, searching for any signs of the pack the pup might have come from.”

Even IDFG “Regan Berkley, regional wildlife biologist” and “Randy Smith, big game manager for the Magic Valley Region” have commented on the pup.

It’s looking more and more like the little wolf will be spending the rest of his life in captivity, probably a wolf sanctuary and personally I don’t think that’s such a bad thing, considering the wolf hating climate in Idaho. Which brings me back to the point of this post.

It strikes me as hypocritical that IDFG managers are taking an active interest in this pup’s welfare when up North in the Lolo and Selway, pups just like him can be slaughtered along with their mothers, fathers, sisters and brothers. Idaho is a brutal place to be a wolf. Hunters snared, trapped, shot and arrowed wolves from August 30, 2011 to March 31, 2012. The slaughter continues in the Lolo and Selway right through breeding, denning and pupping season. This is not a place where a little wolf pup wants to be. Not only did Idaho hunters kill 378 wolves in the last seven months but Wildlife Services continues to kill wolves for agribusiness. A wolf kill order recently went out for Flat Top Ranch, with the Little Wood Pack in trouble. So more wolves will die.

Idaho is decimating it’s wolf population quicker then you can say lickety-split and earning a nasty reputation for itself. It’s been just one year since President Obama signed the budget bill/wolf delisting rider and sent the apex predators into the arms of their enemies and oh how they are delighting in slaughtering them. Just take a visit to some of the wolf hating sites on Facebook or peruse hunting forums to see the carnage in full color. One thing about trophy hunters, they love to pose over the corpses of their prey, smiling like they’ve won the lottery. Of course they don’t just like to kill wolves, they take pleasure in torturing them.

While America sleeps, the wolves they paid millions of dollars to restore, after almost every last one of them was shot, poisoned and trapped by the 1930′s, is on the road to extermination once again in the lower 48.

So excuse me if I think the little, lost wolf hit the jackpot by getting rescued and how sad is that? He has a better chance of surviving in captivity and having a life then ending up in a choking snare, or shot in the gut writhing in pain or sitting for days in a trap trying to chew off his own foot, thirsty and alone waiting for the trapper to come back so he can choke him to death from behind or stomp on his head and body until he kicks and crushes the life out of him. No this little boy is better off somewhere else then the hell hole that Idaho has become for wolves.”

Read Full Post »


LARIMER COUNTY, Colo. (CBS4)

“A lot of planning went into keeping the animals that make their home at a wolf sanctuary in a remote area of Rist Canyon in Larimer County safe from the High Park Fire.

The Wolf sanctuary knew it would be tough to evacuate 30 wild animals so they built underground bunkers. They showed CBS4 some of the video that proved the fire dens worked and 17 wolves are safe because of the structures.

Over the weekend the flames were only a few miles away as the High Park Fire began to blow up. Volunteers at Wolf started tranquilizing 13 of the animals and taking them to safety.

“We went first for the animals that didn’t have dens and worked backwards from there. Unfortunately we ran out of time before we could get all the animals out,” said primary animal caretaker Michelle Proulx.

“Last year when we had the Crystal Mountain Fire, we started developing the idea for fire dens. They’re basically concrete structures we have buried into the mountain side to allow the animals to get out of the flames and smoke in the event we were unable to evacuate them for a fire.”

For the first few days of the week no one knew if the man-made dens worked until an employee was allowed back into the sanctuary.

 

“As we look up this fence line we see scorched trees and scorched ground on the left. Untouched ground to the right,” said Proulx.

One building on the sanctuary grounds was destroyed by fire but the wolf habitat was left standing. The fire had burned right up to the enclosure and left the wolves unharmed.

“And a wolf, happy and healthy,” said Proulx.

For the wolves that didn’t have a den, they’re in a smaller kennel at a volunteer’s house. Now the sanctuary is trying to figure out what to do next.

“It would be ideal to not have to go back to a fire disaster area to keep caring for the animals. The tricky part is finding good locations for them to go,” said Proulx.

The 17 wolf dogs remain in Rist Canyon in part because of the difficulty of tracking them down and putting them in kennels. Many of the wolves had to be shot with tranquilizer darts to subdue them so they could be relocated.”

**Special thanks to CBS Denver for providing this information!

Read Full Post »


“A necropsy revealed that the alpha female sat in Coke’s trap for 10 days to two weeks, eating dirt and rocks. She lost 15 percent of her body weight and broke all of her teeth.

The puppies didn’t know they were being hunted.

On a hillside above the Teklanika River, they pounced on their mother, nuzzled their father, and wrestled each other, chewing on snouts and tails. Through the heat of the day, they slept in the forest, curled up in the filtered light. When evening came, they edged out of the tree wells, skimming the roots with their bellies, and played on the brown grass.

It was June, and silver-gray clouds hung over the wide green valleys of Denali National Park. Beneath Sable, Polychrome, and Eielson Peaks, waves of tundra fanned out like carpet. Beyond the tundra, no people. Only mountains, anchored in glaciers, tearing into the sky.

Pups born into the world-famous Toklat pack cavort without fear in the safety of the 6-million-acre park. Protected since 1952, they roam Denali boldly, brushing up against tourist buses, stealing backpackers’ shoes.

But when food is scarce, they follow the Denali caribou herd past the park’s northeastern boundary and across a narrow no-hunting zone into a windswept valley rich with lichen. Waiting there, just 14 miles from their den site, is an army of hunters that targets the trusting Denali wolf.

One of them, a guide named Coke Wallace, makes no apologies for killing Denali’s wolves. Not only is it legal, he argues, it’s essential to safeguard moose and caribou populations, which hunters kill for sport and food.

The only thing stopping Wallace from decimating the pack is the no-hunting zone, a controversial 90-square-mile buffer fiercely defended by his longtime nemesis, wildlife scientist Gordon Haber. A student of the Toklat for 43 years, Haber has spent thousands of days in Denali recording pack behavior. He insists the safety zone is far too small, and bitterly contests any call to roll it back. But that is exactly what could happen in March 2010, when the buffer comes up for renewal. Already, advocacy groups are gearing up for a battle that will pit hunters against hikers, state biologists against national park officials, and two obdurate, obsessive men against each other.

For Wallace, the next year is a chance to preserve traditional ways. For Haber, it’s a fight to save the world’s most beloved family of wolves. For the pups I saw frolicking above the Teklanika, it’s life or death. The clock is ticking.

Toklat. If you’ve been to Denali, you know this pack, these wolves. Adolph Murie came here in 1939 to study their impact on Dall sheep, and biologists–and tourists–have been watching them ever since. The subject of Murie’s book, The Wolves of Mount McKinley, the Toklat (or East Fork) pack is the longest-studied group of large social vertebrates in the wild, outdating Jane Goodall’s chimps by 30 years.

I saw them often when I worked in Denali as a backcountry ranger in the late 1990s. It was a difficult time for wolves across the park; hunters and trappers were targeting them more aggressively, often setting snares and traps just inches from park boundaries, and shooting them on sight.

Wolf hunting itself wasn’t new–Eskimos baited wolves with whale blubber 10,000 years ago–but it was getting noticed. Protests poured in about Alaska’s bounties and lax regulations. Questions were being raised about the sanctity of Denali’s wildlife. Concerned about the wolves–and the tourism dollars they generated–the Denali Citizens Council asked the Alaska Board of Game to establish safety buffers where the Toklat and Savage wolf groups left federal land.

The board initially balked, but in November 2000, with controversial predator-control programs on tap elsewhere in the state, it conceded a 19-square-mile corridor along the park’s northeastern boundary. In the years since, the zone has grown and shrunk, depending on which political party held sway. At 90 square miles, the current buffer covers half of the windswept valley where the Toklat and other wolf packs congregate to prey on wintering caribou. Called the Wolf Townships, it is the epicenter of Alaska’s wolf wars.

Coke Wallace and Gordon Haber first locked horns over the Toklat in 2001. Bitter enemies who frequent the contested buffer, they’ve been sparring ever since.

“I remember the day Gordy became a nuisance to me,” says Coke, 44, whose face is a smashup of Woody Harrelson and Sean Penn. Alaska-raised and proud of it, Coke lives with his wife and son in the Wolf Townships, where he’s been laying his traps and snares for more than 20 years.

“There were wolves over here and wolves over there,” says Coke, remembering the brisk October day his buddy Brent Keith called him to say it sounded like every wolf in central Alaska was carrying on in his backyard. “It was, as we say in the guide-hunting business, a target-rich environment.”

Heading out, Coke and Brent found 12 wolves sunning themselves on an outcropping, their distended bellies full of moose. The men crawled up and opened fire, killing seven.

Almost immediately, Haber, who monitors multiple wolf packs from the air using radio telemetry, zeroed in on the carnage. “A couple days later,” Coke recalls, “people were calling me at home inflicting me shit over something I do that’s completely legal: state land, state license, state-sanctioned season, state animals.”

Coke also claims that Haber buzzed his house several times a week in a small plane: “It got so bad my 4-year-old wouldn’t go outside because of the scary man in the sky.”

Tensions between the men ran high for weeks, then settled into an uneasy détente. But the word was already out. In 1992 and 1993, Friends of Animals had taken out full-page ads calling for a tourism boycott until aerial wolf killing stopped. Little came of them, except to put the Board of Game on notice that it could no longer operate in a vacuum.

Thanks to Haber, the scrutiny increased again. Nothing happened immediately, but in March 2004 the board surprised everyone with a decision to maintain–rather than reduce–the buffer’s boundaries. At least one member admitted to the Associated Press that the vote was motivated by a desire to make wolf hunting elsewhere in Alaska more palatable.

Coke and other hunters roared in protest, but this time Coke’s anger was directed at Governor Frank Murkowski, who he accused of capitulation to “ecoterrorists,” and at animal lovers who fell for what he calls Haber’s “false biology.”

The fragile peace between Wallace and Haber held until the bitter-cold morning of February 11, 2005, when Coke had had enough. With his buddy Adam, he was out in the Wolf Townships checking the wire snares and metal leg traps he had scattered in the willow around a frozen horse carcass. The snares hung snout-high on a wolf, and the leg traps lay concealed in the snow beside Coke’s snowmobile trail.

Coke didn’t know he had a wolf in his trap that morning, but he’d brought his trailer anyway. If he had gotten lucky, he’d need to get the wolf–or lynx or moose or caribou–back to the small outbuilding on his property where he skins what he catches, the place he calls “the petting zoo.” But he did have a wolf, an adult the color of river stones that happened to be the Toklat’s alpha female, easily identified by her park- service collar. And he shot her, swiftly and cleanly, just like he always does, with his favorite gun, a Ruger MK II.

Then Coke did something he’d never done. Haber’s Cessna 185 came into view, and Coke acted out. Maybe it was frustration, or hatred, or overheated rivalry. As Haber circled, Coke pulled his black balaclava over his face, put on his sunglasses, and stuck the barrel of his pistol in the dead wolf’s mouth. “When I saw Gordy up there with his camera, I said, ‘This is gonna cost me a shitload of grief,'” says Coke. “‘So I’m gonna make it worth it.'”

Coke knew that within days, animal rights activists would be calling his home, threatening to poison him and his family if he didn’t stop killing park wolves. He knew the hostile letters would arrive, calling him an “asshole dirtbag murdering son-of-a-bitch,” from people threatening to hunt him.

With his free hand, Coke gave Adam his camera, telling him to take a picture. Then they coaxed their Ski-Doos to 20 miles per hour, pulling the dead wolf down the Stampede Road. Back at the shed, Coke unloaded the wolf’s body; he’d remove her collar later and turn it in to the park service biologist, following federal regulations, like he always did. But first, he had a call to make–to a T-shirt company.

Coke still smirks when he thinks about the message he had silk-screened above the picture of himself, looking like an Alaskan Sandinista, holding Gordon Haber’s prized Toklat wolf by the throat. He likes to imagine the gash it must have torn in Gordon’s oozy, wolf-loving heart. “Haber has violated my civil liberties,” he declares, “and I can’t get the government to do anything about it because he has a herd of attorneys behind him.”

Coke’s T-shirts come in heather gray and olive green, in a full size run, so you can buy one for your kid. The slogan, printed in square black letters, reads: Visit Alaska This Summer or the Wolf Gets It!”

**for more on this story, please visit http://www.backpacker.com/dogs_of_war_the_battle_over_denalis_toklat_wolf_pack/nature/12719

Read Full Post »


“Campers picked up the young male Friday near Ketchum, beginning an effort to determine if he’s wild — and if he can be returned to his pack.

The pup is awaiting his fate at Zoo Boise.

Tracks on Warm Springs Road in the Smoky Mountains northwest of Ketchum appear to show he was part of a wild pack that lived in the area, said Suzanne Stone, a wolf expert with the Defenders of Wildlife.

Stone and Idaho Department of Fish and Game officers searched in vain Saturday through Monday looking for his pack.

Stone sent an email to wolf biologists worldwide seeking guidance on whether the pack would accept the pup if he were returned. She was deluged with replies — from Europe, Africa, Canada and across the U.S. — giving her enough hope to launch an aerial search and keep looking.

“We haven’t given up yet,” Stone said. “We have weeks if we can find this pack.”

Fish and Game officials still aren’t absolutely sure the pup is a wild wolf; he could be a hybrid someone had as a pet. Fish and Game biologists took a blood sample and sent it away for DNA testing.

The out-of-state campers watched the wolf for about an hour with their car running before picking it up, Stone said. That might have kept the pack from coming for the pup.

For Fish and Game officials, it’s an old story: A mother is scared off, leaving a baby that people take, thinking it abandoned.

Officials warn people to leave them be.

“They didn’t know that the pack would have been right there,” said Mike Keckler, Fish and Game communications chief.

Keckler said the parents were likely moving the pups from a den to a rendezvous site, usually within a mile or two.

The road had been blocked by snow until recently, Stone said. That might explain why the wolves were there in the first place.

The campers took the pup to a veterinarian, where a technician recognized it as a wolf and called Patrick Graham of Defenders of Wildlife. Defenders contacted Fish and Game, and together they agreed to try to find his parents.

The wolf pup was thin but not seriously injured. Fish and Game officers took him to Zoo Boise, where he will await tests and search results.

Zoo Boise vet Holly Peters looked him over and got him to eat some ground meat. But she wanted to wait to do a full exam.

“He was pretty stressed,” said Steve Burns, Zoo Boise director. “She wanted to give him some time to settle down.”

The pup will be quarantined, because officials don’t know what if any diseases he may be carrying, Burns said.

“We want to ensure the health of our collection, as well as him,” Burns said.

Burns is helping Fish and Game by checking with other zoos to determine if they would want him, should he remain in captivity.”

Special thanks to Idaho Statesman for providing this information: http://www.idahostatesman.com/2012/06/01/2137894/rescued-puppy-turns-out-to-be.html#storylink=cpy

Read Full Post »


“February 2012: In Rudyard Kipling’s Jungle Book, Mowgli was adopted and raised by a pack of wolves. They helped him survive in the jungles of India and protected him from harm. Now in the same jungles, the wolf struggles for survival.

Indian subcontinent is known to be one of the major centres of canid genetic diversity.

‘There are two sub-species of grey wolves found in the Indian sub-continent. They are represented by geographically isolated broadly non-overlapping or allopatric populations,’ says Dr Bilal Habib from the Wildlife Institute of India.

Remaining populations are small
‘One of these wolf populations is found in the trans Himalayan terrains of India across the states of Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir and Sikkim and the surviving population is estimated to be fewer than 350 individuals. The second is found in the arid and semi-arid peninsular plains of central India with a population estimate of 2,000 – 3,000 wolves surviving in India.’

Hunting is a major threat
Despite the highest level of protection accorded to the wolves in India, hunting remains rampant and is a major cause of concern. Conflict with humans for livestock depredation, exaggerated public fear regarding their danger, and fragmented habitats that are too small for populations with long-term viability are now threatening their survival.

The situation in West Bengal exemplifies the problem, where the once omnipresent wolf population has become confined to the south-west of the state. Habitat fragmentation there has further pushed the species to the brink by forcing them into direct contact with people resulting in conflicts and retaliatory killings. Moreover, hunting of wolves as well as their prey such as hare, fowl, partridge and mongoose among others for bush-meat has taken a toll.

‘We want volunteers to protect dens’
Acknowledging the emergency, Wildlife Trust of India (WTI) sanctioned a Rapid Action Project (RAP) proposed by the Pugmarks Society for Conservation of Natural Heritage (PSCNH) to work towards the recovery and conservation of the Indian wolf in the state.

‘There are two aspects to this RAP. One is scientific surveys to map distribution and generate baseline information that will help in developing conservation strategies, and the other to spread awareness among locals to prevent poaching and mitigate conflicts,’ said Radhika Bhagat, officer-in-charge, RAP.

‘The immediate activity will be to involve interested volunteers in protection of the dens,’ said Dr Urmila Ganguli, who is heading up the project. ‘The more difficult part will be to change attitude of people about the wolves – currently perceived as threats to livestock. We will be carrying out campaigns to spread awareness on the protected status of the wolves and legal implications of hunting them, but there will also have to be a system of providing relief to the affected people, possibilities of which are also being explored.'”

**Special thanks to “Wildlife Extra” for providing this information!

 

Read Full Post »


“February 2012: In Rudyard Kipling’s Jungle Book, Mowgli was adopted and raised by a pack of wolves. They helped him survive in the jungles of India and protected him from harm. Now in the same jungles, the wolf struggles for survival.

Indian subcontinent is known to be one of the major centres of canid genetic diversity.

‘There are two sub-species of grey wolves found in the Indian sub-continent. They are represented by geographically isolated broadly non-overlapping or allopatric populations,’ says Dr Bilal Habib from the Wildlife Institute of India.

Remaining populations are small
‘One of these wolf populations is found in the trans Himalayan terrains of India across the states of Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir and Sikkim and the surviving population is estimated to be fewer than 350 individuals. The second is found in the arid and semi-arid peninsular plains of central India with a population estimate of 2,000 – 3,000 wolves surviving in India.’

Hunting is a major threat
Despite the highest level of protection accorded to the wolves in India, hunting remains rampant and is a major cause of concern. Conflict with humans for livestock depredation, exaggerated public fear regarding their danger, and fragmented habitats that are too small for populations with long-term viability are now threatening their survival.

The situation in West Bengal exemplifies the problem, where the once omnipresent wolf population has become confined to the south-west of the state. Habitat fragmentation there has further pushed the species to the brink by forcing them into direct contact with people resulting in conflicts and retaliatory killings. Moreover, hunting of wolves as well as their prey such as hare, fowl, partridge and mongoose among others for bush-meat has taken a toll.

‘We want volunteers to protect dens’
Acknowledging the emergency, Wildlife Trust of India (WTI) sanctioned a Rapid Action Project (RAP) proposed by the Pugmarks Society for Conservation of Natural Heritage (PSCNH) to work towards the recovery and conservation of the Indian wolf in the state.

‘There are two aspects to this RAP. One is scientific surveys to map distribution and generate baseline information that will help in developing conservation strategies, and the other to spread awareness among locals to prevent poaching and mitigate conflicts,’ said Radhika Bhagat, officer-in-charge, RAP.

‘The immediate activity will be to involve interested volunteers in protection of the dens,’ said Dr Urmila Ganguli, who is heading up the project. ‘The more difficult part will be to change attitude of people about the wolves – currently perceived as threats to livestock. We will be carrying out campaigns to spread awareness on the protected status of the wolves and legal implications of hunting them, but there will also have to be a system of providing relief to the affected people, possibilities of which are also being explored.'”

**Special thanks to “Wildlife Extra” for providing this information!

 

Read Full Post »