Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Facts and Figures’ Category


  • In order for a new wolf cub to urinate, its mother has to massage its belly with her warm tongue.e
  • The Vikings wore wolf skins and drank wolf blood to take on the wolf’s spirit in battle. They also viewed real wolves as battle companions or hrægifr (corpse trolls).f
  • The earliest drawings of wolves are in caves in southern Europe and date from 20,000 B.C.b
  • Wolves do not make good guard dogs because they are naturally afraid of the unfamiliar and will hide from visitors rather than bark at them.g
  • The autoimmune disease Systemic Lupus Erythmatosus (SLE), or lupus, literally means wolf redness, because in the eighteenth century, physicians believed the disease was caused by a wolf bite.f
  • Wolves are the largest members of the Canidae family, which includes domestic dogs, coyotes, dingoes, African hunting dogs, many types of foxes, and several kinds of jackals.a
  • Wolves run on their toes, which helps them to stop and turn quickly and to prevent their paw pads from wearing down.e
  • Wolves have about 200 million scent cells. Humans have only about 5 million. Wolves can smell other animals more than one mile (1.6 kilometers) away.b
  • A wolf pup’s eyes are blue at birth. Their eyes turn yellow by the time they are eight months old.
    • A male and female that mate usually stay together for life. They are devoted parents and maintain sophisticated family ties.c
    • Wolf gestation is around 65 days. Wolf pups are born both deaf and blind and weigh only one pound.d
    • Under certain conditions, wolves can hear as far as six miles away in the forest and ten miles on the open tundra.a
    • Wolves were once the most widely distributed land predator the world has ever seen. The only places they didn’t thrive were in the true desert and rainforests.e
    • Among true wolves, two species are recognized: Canis lupus (often known simply as “gray wolves”), which includes 38 subspecies, such as the gray, timber, artic, tundra, lobos, and buffalo wolves. The other recognized species is the red wolf (Canis rufus), which are smaller and have longer legs and shorter fur than their relatives. Many scientists debate whether Canis rufus is a separate species.e
    • Immense power is concentrated in a wolf’s jaw. It has a crushing pressure of nearly 1,500 pound per square inch (compared with around 750 for a large dog). The jaws themselves are massive, bearing 42 teeth specialized for stabbing, shearing, and crunching bones. Their jaws also open farther than those of a dog.g
    • The North American gray wolf population in 1600 was 2 million. Today the population in North America is approximately 65,000. The world population is approximately 150,000.b
    • A hungry wolf can eat 20 pounds of meat in a single meal, which is akin to a human eating one hundred hamburgers.b
    • A wolf pack may contain just two or three animals, or it may be 10 times as large.e
    • Though many females in a pack are able to have pups, only a few will actually mate and bear pups. Often, only the alpha female and male will mate, which serves to produce the strongest cubs and helps limit the number of cubs the pack must care for. The other females will help raise and “babysit” the cubs.a
    • Lower-ranking males do not mate and often suffer from a condition of stress and inhibition that has been referred to as “psychological castration.” Lower-ranking females are sometimes so afraid of the alpha female that they do not even go into heat.d
    • An average size wolf produces roughly 1.2 cubic inches of sperm.b
    • Wolves evolved from an ancient animal called Mesocyon, which lived approximately 35 million years ago. It was a small dog-like creature with short legs and a long body. Like the wolf, it may have lived in packs.g
    • Wolves can swim distances of up to 8 miles (13 kilometers) aided by small webs between their toes.b
    • Between 1883 and 1918, more than 80,00 wolves were killed in Montana for bounty.d
    • Adolph Hitler (whose first name means “lead wolf”) was fascinated by wolves and sometimes used “Herr Wolf” or “Conductor Wolf” as an alias. “Wolf’s Gulch” (Wolfsschlucht), “Wolf’s Lair” (Wolfschanze), and “Werewolf” (Wehrwolf) were Hitler’s code names for various military headquarters.f
    • In the 1600s, Ireland was called “Wolf-land” because it had so many wolves. Wolf hunting was a popular sport among the nobility, who used the Irish wolfhound to outrun and kill wolves. The earliest record of an Irish wolfhound dates from Roman times in A.D. 391.f
    • Recent scientists suggest that labeling a wolf “alpha” or “omega” is misleading because “alpha” wolves are simply parent wolves. Using “alpha” terminology falsely suggests a rigidly forced permanent social structure.c
    human howling
    Although wolves are usually afraid of humans, they will respond to human howls
    • Biologists have found that wolves will respond to humans imitating their howls. The International Wolf Center in Minnesota even sponsors “howl nights” on which people can howl in the wilderness and hope for an answering howl.b
    • Wolves have historically been associated with sexual predation. For example, Little Red Riding Hood, who wears a red cape that proclaims her sexual maturity, is seduced off the moral path by a wolf. The sex link endures in common clichés, such as describing a predatory man as “a wolf” or a sexy whistle as a “wolf whistle.”f
    • Biologists describe wolf territory as not just spatial, but spatial-temporal, so that each pack moves in and out of each other’s turf depending on how recently the “no trespassing” signals were posted.d
    • The Greek god Apollo is sometimes called Apollo Lykios, the wolf-Apollo, and was associated with the wind and sun. In Athens, the land surrounding the temple of Apollo became known as the Lyceum, or the “wolf skin.”f
    • In 1927, a French policeman was tried for the shooting of a boy he believed was a werewolf. That same year, the last wild wolves in France were killed.f
    • When Europeans arrived in North America, wolves became the most widely hunted animal in American history and were nearly extinct by the beginning of the twentieth century. The U.S. Federal government even enacted a wolf eradication program in the Western states in 1915.a
    • Dire wolves (canis dirus) were prehistoric wolves that lived in North America about two million years ago. Now extinct, they hunted prey as large as woolly mammoths.e
    • A wolf can run about 20 miles (32 km) per hour, and up to 40 miles (56 km) per hour when necessary, but only for a minute or two. They can “dog trot” around 5 miles (8km) per hour and can travel all day at this speed.g
    • The smallest wolves live in the Middle East, where they may weigh only 30 pounds. The largest wolves inhabit Canada, Alaska, and the Soviet Union, where they can reach 175 pounds.e
    • Wolves howl to contact separated members of their group, to rally the group before hunting, or to warn rival wolf packs to keep away. Lone wolves will howl to attract mates or just because they are alone. Each wolf howls for only about five seconds, but howls can seem much longer when the entire pack joins in.c
    • A light-reflecting layer on a wolf’s eye called the tapetum lucidum (Latin for “bright tapestry”) causes a wolf’s eyes to glow in the dark and may also facilitate night vision. While a wolf’s color perception and visual acuity maybe be inferior to a human’s, a wolf’s eyes are extremely sensitive to movement.d
    wolves ravens
    Ravens, or “wolf-birds,” seem to form social attachments with wolves
    • Where there are wolves, there are often ravens (sometimes known as “wolf-birds”). Ravens often follow wolves to grab leftovers from the hunt—and to tease the wolves. They play with the wolves by diving at them and then speeding away or pecking their tails to try to get the wolves to chase them.g
    • In ancient Rome, barren women attended the Roman festival Lupercalia (named for the legendary nursery cave of Romulus and Remus) in the hopes of becoming fertile.f
    • According to Pliny the Elder, a first-century Greek scholar, wolf teeth could be rubbed on the gums of infants to ease the pain of teething. He also reported that wolf dung could be used to treat both colic and cataracts.f
    • The Aztecs used wolf liver as an ingredient for treating melancholy. They also pricked a patient’s breast with a sharpened wolf bone in an attempt to delay death.f
    • During the Middle Ages, Europeans used powdered wolf liver to ease the pain of childbirth and would tie a wolf’s right front paw around a sore throat to reduce the swelling. Dried wolf meat was also eaten as a remedy for sore shins.f
    • The Greeks believed that if someone ate meat from a wolf-killed lamb, he or she ran a high risk of becoming a vampire.f
    • During the reign of Edward the Confessor, which began in 1042, a condemned criminal was forced to wear a wolf-head mask and could be executed on a “wolf’s head tree” or the gallows where a wolf might be hanged next to him.f
    • Werewolf (wer “man” + wulf “wolf”) trials (which can be distinguished from witchcraft trials) led to hundreds of executions during the 1600s. Men, women, and children—many of whom were physically and mentally handicapped—were put to death.f
    • The Cherokee Indians did not hunt wolves because they believed a slain wolves’ brothers would exact revenge. Furthermore, if a weapon were used to kill a wolf, the weapon would not work correctly again.f
    • In approximately the year 800, Charlemagne founded a special wolf-hunting force, the Louveterie, which remained active until 1789. It was reactivated in1814, and the last French wolf was killed in 1927.a
    • Britain’s King Edgar imposed an annual tax of 300 wolf skins on Wales. The Welsh wolf population was quickly exterminated.a
    • In 1500, the last wolf was killed in England. In 1770, Ireland’s last wolf was killed. In 1772, Denmark’s last wolf was killed.a
    • After hearing of “frightening spirits” in the woods with human features that walked on four legs, Reverend Singh in 1920 discovered a den with two cubs and two human girls, one around age 7 or 8, the other around 2. After being brought back to “civilization,” the younger one died within a year. Recently, authors have questioned the validity of this story as modern knowledge has revealed that wolf-like behavior is often seen in autistic or abused children.d
    • Sextus Placitus, in his fifth-century B.C. Medicina de quadrupedibus (Medicinals from Animals), claims that sleeping with a wolf’s head under one’s pillow would cure insomnia.f
    • In 1934, Germany became the first nation in modern times to place the wolf under protection. Influenced by Friedrich Nietzsche’s (1844-1900) and Oswald Spengler’s (1880-1936) belief that natural predators possessed more vigor and virility than their prey, the protection was probably more for an “iconic” wolf than the actual wolf, particularly since the last wolves in Germany were killed in the middle of the nineteenth century.f
    facial expression
    Wolves are one of the few animals that communicate using a great range of facial expressions
    • Unlike other animals, wolves have a variety of distinctive facial expressions they use to communicate and maintain pack unity.c
    • The Japanese word for wolf means “great god.”f
    • Between 6,000 and 7,000 wolf skins are still traded across the world each year. The skins are supplied mainly by Russia, Mongolia, and China and are used mainly for coats.a
    • In India, simple wolf traps are still used. These traps consist of a simple pit, disguised with branches or leaves. The wolves fall in and people then stone them to death.a
    • Wolves were the first animals to be placed on the U.S. Endangered Species Act list in 1973.a
    • John Milton’s famous poem “Lycidas” derives its title from the Greek for “wolf cub,” lykideus.f
    • In the Harry Potter universe, werewolf Remus Lupin’s name is directly related to the Latin word for wolf (lupus) and suggests an association with one of the founders of Rome, Remus, who was suckled by a wolf. The dual nature of Lupin’s werewolf nature suggests that in the Potter realm, there are two sides to everything.f
    • The last wolf in Yellowstone Park was killed in 1926. In 1995, wolves were reintroduced and, after just ten years, approximately 136 wolves now roam the Park in about 13 wolf packs.b
    • Currently, there are about 50,000 wolves in Canada; 6,500 in Alaska; and 3,500 in the Lower 48 States. In Europe, Italy has fewer than 300; Spain around 2,000; and Norway and Sweden combined have fewer than 80. There are about 700 wolves in Poland and 70,000 in Russia.b*

*Special thanks to “Random Facts” (http://facts.randomhistory.com/interesting-facts-about-wolves.html) for providing this information!

 

Read Full Post »


“1) Palin offered a bountyof $150 for each left front leg of freshly killed wolves

2) Palin promoted aerial hunting of wolves even though Alaskans voted twice to ban it

3) Palin used $400,000 of state money to fund a propaganda campaign in support of aerial hunting

4) Palin believes man-made global warming is a farce

5) Palin strongly supports drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

6) Palin is a champion for big oil and her slogan has become “Drill, baby, drill!”

7) Palin  sued the federal government to prevent listing the polar bear as an endangered species 

8) Palin sued the federal government over listing Cook Inlet beluga whale as an endangered species

rah Palin spent $400,000 of state moneyto “educate” Alaskans about aerial hunting of wolves and bears.  State tax money was used to directly influence the outcome of proposition 2 which would have limited aerial shooting of predators.  Since Alaskans had previously voted twice to ban aerial shooting of predators, Palin used state tax money to buy support for aerial shooting. Buying votes with tax money worked – proposition two was voted down on 8/26/08.  

Read more about Governor Palin’s “predator control” policies and the use of state money to slaughter bears and wolves.  In 2008 the Alaska Dept. of Fish and Game  exterminated 1,400 bears out of a population of 2,000 in an area west of Anchorage. The Alaskan Board of Game even approved the hunting of black bear mothers and cubs with the goal of killing 60 percent of the black bear population.  Although biologists have known since the 60’s that predators actually keep prey populations healthy, Alaskan wolves and bears are being exterminated (using cruel practices such as baiting, trapping, and aerial shooting) to “boost” dwindling moose populations.  Do we really want a leader who doesn’t believe in science?  

 

The Alaska Board of Game makes most wildlife decisions in Alaska.  The board is comprised entirely of trophy hunters with ties to the sport hunting industry and NRA.  Not a single wildlife biologist or scientist is a member.  For years Alaskans have been asking for  representation on the board of game from non consumptive wildlife industries such as wildlife viewing.  There has never been any representation from Alaska’s huge wildlife viewing and tourism industry.  The most important decisions about wildlife in Alaska are decided by ignorant sport hunters with a total disregard for science.  Palin even appointed her former middle school basketball coach to the board.   In 2009 Palin appointed Teresa Sager-Albaugh, 45, of Tok.  “Sager-Albaugh is a former president of the Alaska Outdoors Council, a federation of outdoors’ clubs and the official state association of the National Rifle Association.”  (Anchorage Daily News).

 

Alaskan Government Spends Millions to Shoot Wolves

 

Sarah Palin claims that aerial hunting is necessary to help poor Alaskans who need to hunt moose for food. But it costs $500/hr. to charter a bush plane, and double that to charter a helicopter.  Let’s do the math – with over 800 wolves killed  by aerial shooting, with an average of four hours to kill them (low estimate), times $500/hr. to charter a plane, that’s at least $1.6 Million spent on air travel to kill wolves!  Wouldn’t it be easier to spend that money giving the poor food vouchers?  Add the nearly half a million dollars that Palin spent to “educate” Alaskans about aerial hunting, and you could probably feed the whole state.  It’s obvious that aerial hunting of wolves is not about helping to feed the poor.For more information about Sarah Palin and Alaska’s wildlife policies visit the Alaska Wildlife Alliance

To read more of this article, please visit, “http://www.grizzlybay.org/SarahPalinInfoPage.htm

 

 

 

Read Full Post »


*Check out this article provided by authors Tory and Meredith Taylor, Wyofile (in depth reporting about Wyoming people, places, and policies) from April 06th, 2009.  This gives you some good facts about predator/prey relationships and other causes of Elk decline.  Please read and provide your feedback!

While some Wyoming legislators, hunters, and ranchers claim that wolves are decimating the state’s elk herds, analysis of the facts tells a different story. Prior to the reintroduction of wolves into the Greater Yellowstone area during 1995 and 1996, some pessimists predicted that following wolf recovery, Wyoming’s abundant elk herds and popular elk hunting would be things of the past.

In contrast, many wildlife biologists — who had a better grasp of predator-prey relationships — predicted that after wolves recovered, elk distribution and behavior might fluctuate in some herds, but that elk numbers would be largely unaffected. Now, wolf and elk population monitoring studies indicate that the wildlife biologists’ predictions were more accurate than the darker forecasts of the anti-wolf pessimists.

Many things kill Wyoming elk. Human hunters, animal predators, disease, too little or too much precipitation, hard winters, and poor forage all help determine which elk live and which die. Other things — auto-elk collisions, spring floods, lightning, fences, culling of diseased elk, and poaching — also take a toll. The risks to elk seem daunting at times, and the odds of an elk dying of old age are slim.

How many elk are in Wyoming and how many do we want? Through a public process taking into consideration many factors, the Wyoming Game and Fish Department sets objectives for the state elk population. The department weighs factors such as forage availability, winter range, and hunter demand. Other factors with greater weight, such as landowners’ desires and political wishes, are also considered. Game and Fish wildlife biologists annually compare elk populations against the population objectives in order to determine proper management strategies. If elk numbers are declining from the population objective, wildlife managers rummage in their “elk population tool box” for appropriate tools to fix the problem. For example, they may need fewer hunters and more habitat improvement projects. If elk numbers are increasing too much above the herd objective, wildlife managers may increase hunting opportunities by issuing more hunting licenses, lengthening hunting seasons, or instituting hunter access programs that facilitate elk harvest.

Each year Wyoming wildlife biologists collect data from elk herds and elk hunting seasons in order to gauge trends. Elk data from the state’s 35 elk herds and eight management districts are compiled in Wyoming Fish and Game Department annual reports that show the big picture of Wyoming elk populations. Interestingly, the annual reports’ data tell a far different story about Wyoming elk numbers and elk hunting opportunities than is often heard in coffee shops, from bar stools, and at the state legislature.

Nearly three decades of Wyoming elk data taken from the department’s annual reports show that the elk population, number of elk harvested, and elk hunter success rates have steadily increased both before and after wolf reintroduction. During this time, the number of elk hunting licenses sold each year has slightly decreased. This means that Wyoming has more elk today than thirty years ago, with about the same number of hunters killing more elk.

According to the 2008 Game and Fish Annual Report, the 2007 state elk population objective was 83,140 animals. The estimated Wyoming elk population was calculated from only 27 of 35 elk herds at 94,936 animals (population estimates for the other eight herd units are not available in the report or from the department). Even with eight herd units missing from the count, the 2007 Wyoming elk population was 14 percent above the target population objective, according to the annual report.

“The Department continues to manage for a reduction in Wyoming’s elk population,” the report states, noting that “overall, management strategies will continue to focus on decreasing the statewide population. However, some herds are at objective and will be managed for their current numbers.” (WGFD, 2008 Annual Report, p. A-2.)

*Source Wyoming Game and Fish Department Annual Reports.
(1) Statewide elk population was calculated from 27 of 35 elk herds; 8 herd populations unavailable
(2) Statewide elk population was calculated from 29 of 35 elk herds; 6 herd populations unavailable.
(3) Statewide elk population was calculated from 28 of 35 elk herds; 7 herd populations unavailable.
(4) Statewide elk population was calculated from 28 of 35 elk herds; 7 herd populations unavailable.
(5) Statewide elk population was calculated from 27 of 35 elk herds; 8 herd populations unavailable.
Note: 2003-07 elk population estimates are below actual numbers.

Wyoming has never been a state to let science or facts get in the way of culture, custom, and wishful thinking. Our 1880s-era political system is based on a one cow, one vote premise, and change comes hard.

In an e-mail exchange with WyoFile during the 2009 legislative session, Wyoming State Rep. Pat Childers (R-Park), chairman of the Travel, Recreation, and Wildlife Committee, stated his opinion that wolves are bad for elk.

“As for wolves and elks [sic], I have had two reports from the Wyoming Game & Fish presented to me that clearly show that the wolves are impacting the ungulate [sic] of the elk herds,” Childers wrote. “While the populations of those herds have not currently decreased, the study shows that the populations of the herds will soon be reduced to an alarming low level because the loss of ungulate [sic] will result in less animals.”

An “ungulate” is a hoofed mammal; it’s unclear what Chairman Childers thinks it is.

The Game and Fish department’s Absaroka Elk Study that Chairman Childers cites clearly shows that elk numbers have been well above the Clark’s Fork herd objective since 1992, throughout the entire wolf recovery period. What Childers thinks would reduce the elk to alarmingly low levels is not clear, but herd reduction appears to be the intended goal of the Wyoming Game and Fish Department order to manage the elk at or near the herd’s population objective. (Absaroka Elk Ecology Project, 2008 update. WYGFD, UW, and USFWS.)

All elk populations do not respond identically to sharing landscape with wolves, a new report from Montana suggests. Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks and Montana State University researchers spent the past seven years monitoring elk populations and behavior in southwestern Montana. Their study shows that elk numbers in some areas dropped, mostly due to the loss of elk calves to wolves and grizzly bears. But in other Montana areas, elk numbers increased while hunter-harvests of elk decreased, with little apparent influence by local wolf packs on elk numbers.

“One-size-fits-all explanations of wolf-elk interactions across large landscapes do not seem to exist,” said Justin Gude, chief of Fish, Wildlife and Parks wildlife research in Helena. He noted that the study also found that “calves with higher gamma globulin levels, a possible indicator of superior condition, survived better than those with lower levels, demonstrating that environmental factors are also important contributing factors to predation and survival with Yellowstone elk calves.”

How big a bite do predators take out of elk herds? Since wolf restoration in Greater Yellowstone, some people assumed the wolves would be the main cause of elk calf mortality. So from 2003 to 2005 the U.S. Geological Survey, Yellowstone National Park, and the University of Minnesota conducted an elk calf mortality study to answer the question of who’s eating what. The study showed that wolves accounted for about 12 percent of newborn calf deaths, while grizzly and black bears caused about 69 percent of recorded deaths, and coyotes killed 11 percent. wolf hunting

(Elk Calf Survival and Mortality Following Wolf Restoration to Yellowstone National Park, Shannon M. Barber-Meyer, L. David Mech, and P. J. White,13(3) Yellowstone Science, Summer 2005, p. 37.)

While many current ranchers are from fourth and fifth- generation families, wolves have had an even longer history in the West. (See, “Trophic Cascade: The Case For Wolves,” by Debra Donahue, WyoFile 07/21/2008)

And now there is a new economic constituency for wolves. Winter wolf-watch trips to Yellowstone are transforming Yellowstone into a year-around destination. According to Dr. John Duffield’s research for the University of Montana, wolves are now a tourist magnet annually bringing in at least $35 million directly, or $70 million indirectly through the multiplier effect, to such Yellowstone satellite communities as Cody, Dubois, and Jackson.

Wolf numbers are down this winter in Wyoming because of disease (distemper and mange), inter-pack conflicts, and excessive wolf shootings while the animal was delisted in the state during 2008.

“The number of wolves in Yellowstone National Park declined last year,” a January 2009 Yellowstone National Park news release stated. “It’s the first drop in wolf numbers in the park in three years. The Yellowstone Wolf Project reports the 2008 population at 124 wolves, down 27 percent from the 171 wolves recorded in 2007. The greatest decline occurred on the northern range, the area with the greatest wolf population density. The wolf population there dropped 40 percent, from 94 to 56 wolves.”

However, disease also reduced the population in 2005, when the numbers showed an even greater drop from 171 wolves in 2004, to 118, due to distemper. Sarcoptic mange is also a concern in Yellowstone wolves and has recently been identified in a Jackson-area wolf pack. The number of breeding pairs in the park has declined from 10 to six. This decline brings the wolves to the lowest number of breeding pairs recorded since 2000, when wolves first met the minimum population requirement for delisting.

Where does this leave people who are directly affected by wolves? Outfitter Bud Betts lives in the Dunoir Valley along the Wiggins elk herd migration route. His closest neighbors are elk, grizzly bears, and wolves. Betts says the wolves are doing fine, but the elk are not.

“The elk cow-calf numbers are down closer to herd objective, so we have reduced hunter opportunities. I don’t like the wolf,” he admits, but philosophically adds, “They are here and we have to live with them.”

Wildlife science still takes a back seat to politics in Wyoming. According to an Associated Press article in the February 24, 2009 Casper Star Tribune, Wyoming lawmakers want to test wolves for brucellosis, a bacterial infection best known in Wyoming in cattle and bison, although different forms of the disease can also infect swine, goats, sheep and dogs.

During the 2009 legislative session, Senate File 87, sponsored by Sen. Kit Jennings (R-Natrona) and Rep. Childers, would have required Wyoming Game and Fish to test wolves for the disease.

“[Brucellosis is] not even an issue,” said Mike Jimenez, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s wolf recovery project director for Wyoming. “No one’s ever really been concerned about it, but for whatever reason, if there is a concern, it’s easy enough to test for it.”

Jimenez said that federal wildlife agents have tested 16 captured or killed Wyoming wolves for the disease, but the results were all negative.

Terry Kreeger, state game and fish department supervisor of veterinary services, said the Sybille, WY research laboratory has tested wolves for brucellosis occasionally, and all results have been negative, he said.

“Given what we know today, we would consider wolves a dead-end host for [bovine brucellosis] bacteria, i.e., they become infected but they are not capable of transmitting it to other animals, even other wolves,” he said. Kreeger said he doesn’t believe wolves are a factor in Wyoming’s brucellosis problem. He said studies have shown that wolves infected with brucellosis do not transmit the disease.

Some Wyoming lawmakers are more practical than others when dealing with wolf management. In 2009 Wyoming Rep. Keith Gingery (R – Jackson/Dubois) introduced House Bill 21 to classify and manage wolves solely as “trophy game” statewide, which would have allowed the wolf to be delisted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. In the mid-1990′s, state wildlife staff recommended the “trophy animals” classification, but the politically-appointed Wyoming Game and Fish Commission, livestock interests, and most Wyoming politicians flatly rejected the idea.

Instead, politics insisted that Wyoming wolves be classified as both “trophy and predator” throughout most of the state. Predator classification means that the animal can be shot on sight at any time. Trophy game status requires a Wyoming Game and Fish regulation to hunt the animal only with a seasonal license. This dual classification has kept wolf management out of state hands, so in 2008 the wildlife commission voted to support a statewide trophy game management plan. Soon after this decision, the Wyoming Wildlife Federtion, the state’s leading hunting organization, also read the writing on the wall and voted to change its position to now support statewide trophy game management for wolves. HB 21 died this session as lawmakers stuck to their guns and their original dual classification, predator/trophy game plan. The U.S. Wildlife Service has already rejected the plan, and after a lawsuit over the large number of wolves killed in Wyoming last year, the animals have been “relisted.”

“If Wyoming wants to get to the point at which the people of Wyoming, through the Wyoming Game and Fish, manage wolves rather than the Feds,” Gingery said to WyoFile, “then we need to change our proposed wolf plan. The Feds have made it clear that they will not accept a dual status of predator/trophy game. The Feds want Wyoming to adjust their plan to a single status, namely trophy game status, just like Montana and Idaho have already done. This was under the Bush administration, and I highly doubt the Obama administration will lessen that requirement.

“Thus, the option is either drop the dual status or continue to fight in court for the next five years knowing full well that in the end we will lose. The issue that the courts will look at is whether or not the Wyoming plan meets the requirements of the Endangered Species Act, and at this point it does not.”

During the past two decades, wolf recovery and management have dwelt much more in the political and legal realms than in the biology and wildlife management worlds. Endangered species such as wolves and grizzly bears resonate loudly on the states’ rights drum. While we humans navigate the procedures of the state and national management plan process, wolves and elk, predators and prey, continue their delicate dance in Greater Yellowstone, as they have for tens of thousands of years.

Read Full Post »


The Spokesman-Review released the following article:

“Montana has just announced that at least 566 wolves inhabit the state, according to the 2010 annual wolf conservation and management report released today by Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks. The report  shows Montana’s minimum wolf population increased about 8 percent in 2010, compared to a 4 percent increase last year and an 18 percent increase in 2008. The minimun numbers indicate that wolves have increased to 108 verified packs and 35 breeding pairs.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service followed Montana by posting the complete 2010 Northern Rockies wolf update, which includes the census from Idaho and Wyoming.

The report by Idaho Fish and Game biologists documented a minimum of 705 wolves in 87 packs at the end of 2010. In addition, they documented 22 border packs along boundaries with Montana, Wyoming and Washington. Of the 54 Idaho packs known to have reproduced, 46 qualified as breeding pairs by the end of the year. These reproductive packs produced a minimum of 189 pups in 2010.

For 2009, Idaho reported a minimum population of 843 wolves in 94 packs in the state along wtih 20 documented border packs

Idaho’s decline is at least partly due to the difficulty of monitoring wolves in remote areas of central Idaho, federal officials said.

“I’m certain we could have successfully reduced the wolf population in 2010 if we could have proceeded with our planned, science-based hunting season,” said FWP Director Joe Maurier. “When you look at our management success in 2009, we had a vigorous wolf population at the end of the year and we were still able to control its growth. It’s clear that a management strategy that includes hunting can play an important role in managing wolves in Montana. It is a tool we need and one we’re still trying to get back.”

Last year, FWP joined in a federal lawsuit in defense of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s 2009 decision to delist wolves in Montana and Idaho, but not in Wyoming. The U.S. District Judge in Missoula, however, reinstated federal protections of wolves in the northern Rocky Mountains on Aug. 5.

The minimum recovery goal for wolves in the northern Rocky Mountains was set at a minimum of 30 breeding pairs—successfully reproducing wolf packs—and a minimum of 300 individual wolves for at least three consecutive years and well distributed throughout the recovery area. The goal was achieved in 2002, and the wolf population has increased every year since.

FWP’s report is part of the annual federal recovery update required by USFWS. The end of 2010 count also estimates that at least 343 wolves inhabited Wyoming, up slightly from 2009. The count in Idaho dropped slightly to 705, likely due to the state’s decision to reel in monitoring efforts in central Idaho’s rugged wilderness areas. Annual reports from Idaho, Wyoming, and information about wolves in Yellowstone National Park and the northern Rockies are available from the USFWS online at http://westerngraywolf.fws.gov.

The northern Rockies’ “metapopulation” is comprised of wolf populations in Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming. Four packs are now verified in Oregon and Washington within the northern Rocky Mountain Distinct Population segment. Today, at least 1,651 wolves in 244 packs, with about 111 breeding pairs, live in the region, where wolves can travel about freely to join existing packs or form new packs. This, combined with wolf populations in Canada and Alaska, assures the genetic diversity of wolves throughout the region.

Each of the three geographic regions of Montana inhabited by wolves showed slight increases in 2010 from 2009:

  • northwestern Montana’s population exhibited the greatest increase where the population grew to a minimum of 326 wolves, in 68 verified packs, and 21 breeding pairs. Seven of the packs reside on reservations where they are managed by Tribal authorities.
  • western Montana’s population increased slightly to at least 122 wolves in 21 packs, and eight breeding pairs.
  • southwestern Montana’s population increased slightly to at least 118 wolves in 19 packs, and six breeding pairs.

About 24 packs occur along Montana’s border with Idaho, 18 of which are included in the Montana estimate. This demonstrates the continued influence of the robust wolf population in Idaho on Montana’s wolf population. Additionally, six packs are shared with Wyoming, four of which are included in Montana’s population. 

Compared to Idaho and Wyoming, at 24 percent Montana had the highest rate of known human-caused mortality of wolves in 2010. Officials say that’s due to Montana’s wolf population, as a whole, living on a combination of public and private lands.

Maurier noted, however, that Montana’s wolf population still increased and remains well above recovery goals. “Nearly all of Montana’s wolves live outside national parks,” he said. “That means an intensive management strategy is needed to strike the right balance between wolves and public acceptance. Unfortunately that’s out of our hands, but it’s crystal clear that this species is fully recovered. Montana has made room for wolves and it is our position that Montana must be given the authority to manage them.”

**How accurate do you think these numbers are?  Wolf Preservation would like to hear your comments!

Read Full Post »


Many of us think of communication only as talking or writing to each other. Those are two ways humans share information every day. How do wolves “converse?” Even though they cannot talk or write, wolves communicate effectively in several ways.

Wolves use body language to convey the rules of the pack. A wolf pack is very organized. Rule number one says that the pack is made up of leaders and followers. The pack leaders are the male parent and the female parent – usually the father and mother of the other pack members. They are likely to be the oldest, largest, strongest and most intelligent wolves in the pack. They are known as the alpha wolves and are usually the only members of the pack to produce pups.

Any wolf can become an alpha. However, to do so, it must find an unoccupied territory and a member of the opposite sex with which to mate. Or, more rarely, it moves into a pack with a missing alpha and takes its place, or perhaps kills another alpha and usurps its mate.

The alpha male and female are dominant, or in charge of the pack. To communicate dominance, the alphas carry their tails high and stand tall. Less dominant wolves exhibit submissive behavior by holding their tails down and often lower their bodies while pawing at the higher ranking wolves.

There are two levels of submissive behavior: active and passive. Active submission is a contact activity in which signs of inferiority are evident such as crouching, muzzle licking and tail tucking. The behaviors typical of active submission are first used by pups to elicit regurgitation in adults. These behaviors are retained into adulthood by subordinate wolves, where they function as a gesture of intimacy and the acceptance of the differentiation of the roles of the wolves that are involved.

Passive submission is shown when a subordinate wolf lays on its side or back, thus exposing the vulnerable ventral side of its chest and abdomen to the more dominant wolf. The subordinate wolf may also abduct its rear leg to allow for anogenital inspection by the dominant wolf. If two wolves have a disagreement, they may show their teeth and growl at each other. Both wolves try to look as fierce as they can. Usually the less dominant wolf, the subordinate one, gives up before a fight begins. To show that it accepts the other wolf’s authority, it rolls over on its back. Reactions to this behavior may range from tolerance (the dominant wolf standing over the submissive wolf) to mortal attack, particularly in the case of a trespassing alien wolf. Following the dominance rules usually keeps the wolves in a pack from fighting among themselves and hurting each other.

Wolves convey much with their bodies. If they are angry, they may stick their ears straight up and bare their teeth. A wolf who is suspicious pulls its ears back and squints. Fear is often shown by flattening the ears against the head. A wolf who wants to play dances and bows playfully.

Wolves have a very good sense of smell about 100 times greater than humans. They use this sense for communication in a variety of ways. Wolves mark their territories with urine and scats, a behavior called scent-marking. When wolves from outside of the pack smell these scents, they know that an area is already occupied. It is likely that pack members can recognize the identity of a packmate by its urine, which is useful when entering a new territory or when packmembers become separated. Dominant animals may scent mark through urination every two minutes. When they do so they raise a leg, this dominant posture utilizes multiple forms of communication and is called a “Raised Leg Urination” or RLU.

Wolves will also use urine to scent mark food caches that have been exhausted. By marking an empty cache, the animal will not waste time digging for food that isn’t there.

Wolves use their sense of smell to communicate through chemical messages. These chemical messages between members of the same species are known as “pherimones.” Sources of pherimones in wolves include glands on the toes, tail, eyes, anus, genitalia and skin. For example, a male is able to identify a female in estrus by compounds (pherimones) present in her urine and copulation will only be attempted during this time.

Of course, their sense of smell also tells them when food or enemies are near.

Have you ever heard a wolf howl? They’re not howling at the moon they are communicating. They call any time of the day, but they are most easily heard in the evening when the wind dies down and wolves are most active. Wolves’ vocalizations can be separated into four categories: barking, whimpering, growling, and howling. Sounds created by the wolf may actually be a combination of sounds such as a bark-howl or growl-bark.

Barking is used as a warning. A mother may bark to her pups because she senses danger, or a bark or bark-howl may be used to show aggression in defense of the pack or territory.

Whimpering may be used by a mother to indicate her willingness to nurse her young. It is also used to indicate “I give up” if they are in a submissive position and another wolf is dominating them.

Growling is used as a warning. A wolf may growl at intruding wolves or predators, or to indicate dominance.

Howling is the one form of communication used by wolves that is intended for long distance. A defensive howl is used to keep the pack together and strangers away, to stand their ground and protect young pups who cannot yet travel from danger, and protect kill sites. A social howl is used to locate one another, rally together and possibly just for fun.

Can you think of ways that humans communicate without using words?

How Do Wolves Say Hello?

Have you seen dogs jump up to greet their owners, bark at strangers or roll over when another dog approaches? Then you already know something about how wolves communicate. Dogs inherited most of their language from their ancestors, the wolves.

Wolves use three different languages:

  1. Sound – Howls, Barks, Whimpers and Growls.
  2. Special Scents – Scats, Urine and Pherimones.
  3. Body Language – Body Positions and Movements and Facial Expressions.

**Special thanks to “International Wolf Center” for providing this information!

Read Full Post »


  • What do wolves eat?

Wolves are carnivores, or meat eaters. Gray wolves prey primarily on ungulates – large, hoofed mammals such as white-tailed deer, mule deer, moose, elk, caribou, bison, Dall sheep, musk oxen, and mountain goats. Medium-sized mammals, such as beaver and snowshoe hares, can be an important secondary food source. Occasionally wolves will prey on birds or small mammals such as mice and voles, but these are supplementary to their requirements for large amounts of meat. Wolves have been observed catching fish in places like Alaska and western Canada. They will also kill and eat domestic livestock such as cattle and sheep, and they will consume carrion if no fresh meat is available. Some wolves eat small amounts of fruit, although this is not a significant part of their diet. If prey is abundant, wolves may not consume an entire carcass, or they may leave entire carcasses without eating. This is called “surplus killing” and seems inconsistent with the wolves’ habit of killing because they are hungry. Surplus killing seems to occur when prey are vulnerable and easy to catch – in winter, for instance, when there is deep snow. Since wolves are programmed to kill when possible, they may simply be taking advantage of unusual situations when wild prey are relatively easy to catch They may return later to feed on an unconsumed carcass, or they may leave it to a host of scavengers. Additionally, they may cache food and dig it up at a later time.

Red wolves primarily prey on white-tailed deer, raccoons, rabbits, nutria and other rodents.

  • How much do wolves eat?

Getting enough to eat is a full-time job for a wolf. When wolves catch and kill a large mammal, they will gorge and then rest while the food is being rapidly digested. They will generally consume all but the hide, some of the large bones and skull and the rumen (stomach contents of ungulates) of their prey. Gray wolves can survive on about 2 1/2 pounds of food per wolf per day, but they require about 7 pounds per wolf per day to reproduce successfully. The most a large gray wolf can eat at one time is about 22.5 pounds. Adult wolves can survive for days and even weeks without food if they have to. Growing pups, however, require regular nourishment in order to be strong enough to travel and hunt with the adults by the autumn of their first year. Wolves often rely on food they have cached after a successful hunt in order to see them through lean times.

Red wolves may eat 2 to 5 pounds of food per day when prey is abundant. Because they are smaller than gray wolves, they can consume less at one time than their larger cousins. But like all wolves, eating for red wolves is a matter of “feast” followed by “famine.”

  • How many prey animals do wolves kill per year?

Wolves depend on a variety of large ungulates (hoofed animals) for food. Although studies have been conducted in some areas to determine the actual number of prey killed each year, the results are estimates. For example, an estimate for deer ranges from 15 to 19 adult-sized deer per wolf per year. Given the 2008 estimate of 2922 wolves in Minnesota, for instance, that would equal 43,800 to 58,500 deer killed by wolves. In comparison, hunters killed approximately 260,000 deer in the 2007 deer harvest. Additionally, several thousand deer are killed during collisions with vehicles each year.

*Thanks to the International Wolf Center for providing this information!

Read Full Post »


Illegal killing continues at an alarming rate that makes it difficult for wolves to gain ground.  Wolf haters have unlawfully killed at least 34 Mexican gray wolves since 1998, making it the main cause of death for Mexican wolves, according to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services.  Only two wolf killers have been caught and prosecuted.  LESS than 50 Mexican gray wolves remain!  Even killing one wolf in a pack has disasterous results to the survivors by seriously disrupting family structure.  Assassinating an experiences wolf takes away his or her ability to teach younger, less experiences wolves to hunt and overcome the brutal, harsh environment.

 One of the most agonizing and most used argument against wolves is predation on livestock. According to wildlife ecologists with the Industrial Economics, Inc., wolves account for only a fraction of cattle deaths each year–0.3 percent to 2.5 percent of all cattle losses in recovery areas. If people utilized more protective measures, that number would decrease even further.

It’s important to note that sometimes wolves are purposely baited into an incident. Here’s what I’m referring to: Mike Miller, a New Mexico rancher who admitted using telemetry equipment to locate the den of a pup-rearing female, branded cattle nearby to entice the wolves in for a feast. The female wolf was killed, leaving her pups to die and the pack to fail.

Please contact your state officials and let them know we cannot exterminate the Mexican gray wolf!

*Thanks to the Winter 2010 edition of Defenders, The Conservation Magazine of Defenders of Wildlife for including this information, written by Senior Editor Heidi Ridgley.

Read Full Post »


A recent mystery transpires in Gatchel, Indiana when a homeowner’s pet dog survives a vicious attack by what appears to be a wolf. The only flaw to this unfortunate scenario…Indiana wolves were eradicated over 100 years ago.   

YouTube houses the Channel 14 story and can be seen at the following link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRGDvPVaTIc(Warning: there are a few graphic pictures).

As seen from the video link, a number of wolf hybrids bonded together and likely escaped from their owners. Wolf hybrids are a mix of a wolf and a dog and are very uncommon because almost all of them are bred by humans. Despite common perception, breeding these two genetically similar animals does not usually produce a docile, loving best friend. In fact, mixing the two species can cause a normally tame dog persona to fight with an instinctually marauder persona.

Dr. Randall Lockwood, ASPCA’s Senior Vice President for forensic sciences weighs in on the subject, “I have bred several myself in my research and worked with them.  People who seek out wolf hybrids often do it for selfish and egotistical reasons.  They want something exotic.  It’s a mistaken belief that somehow they are honoring the spirit of the wild.  Yet they have produced an animal that cannot usually live safely or happily with humans.  It can’t live as a wild animal, nor does it have the adaptation of a dog.  Wolf-dog hybrids are not necessarily more aggressive, but they are often very easily frightened and aroused.  They’re escape artists—virtually almost every one I have ever known has escaped.  They can be predatory.  They are not suited to the wild world of companion animals.  They are difficult to train.  Wolves have enormous control over their aggression—wolves rarely fight other wolves.  But when you breed wolves with dogs, it’s potentially a very dangerous combination.” 

It’s interesting to note that Lockwood also added that on average, there has been one hybrid-caused fatality a year over the last twenty years in the United States.  By comparison, Merritt Clifton, editor of Animal People News claimed that there were 345 people killed by dogs between 1982 and 2009; 159 of these fatalities were actually caused by the infamous pit bull terrier or a similar mix.

Unfortunately, given the wolf’s notorious history, the rare occurrence of a bite or fatality inflicted wound by a wolf-hybrid would most likely reinforce its deleterious reputation. The perception of the wolf has long been misunderstood. A predator by birth, one of the most common misconceptions is that a wolf lives to eat…anything. This couldn’t be further from the truth. A wolf, as stated before being a predatory animal, is far more likely to stalk prey that it perceives as a challenge rather than prey it perceives as “available.” This does not preclude that wolf related incidents don’t occur. If an animal (or person) is hungry enough its instincts will kick in and it will find a way to feed itself. This is one of the many reasons breeding a wolf and a dog can be a huge mistake. The wolf’s predatory nature will conflict with a domestic canine personality.

Although ownership of a wolf hybrid is a decision not to be taken lightly, uninformed people taking on this difficult responsibility should keep a few critical ideas in mind:  provide extraordinary amounts of space, time, security, and avoid the use of cages.  Spend extra time researching the needs of wolf hybrids and consult with an expert on the subject.  You can start by visiting the following link through “Wolf Park,” a non-profit research and education center dedicated to behavioral research on wolves:  (http://www.wolfpark.org/wolfhybridposition.shtml).  Dr. Erich Klinghammer, Director of Wolf Park explained some insightful knowledge on the livelihood of owning such a majestic animal, “The way such animals are often kept does not usually meet the social and behavioral needs of the animals. They frequently languish in small cages, or are tied to chains, with no quality of life to speak of.  We are concerned that pet wolves and hybrids improperly kept, when they do cause damage negatively affect the image of the wolf in the wild. Hence, we all should do what we can to prevent this by practicing and promoting responsible ownership.” 

Wolf organizations have devoted their talents and efforts to rescue wolf hybrids that would otherwise be put to death.  Many of these steadfast organizations can likely attest that wolf hybrids have gotten more negative attention than they deserve and act appropriately in accordance with the amount of expertise and effort owners contribute. 

Continue reading on Examiner.com: Hybrids Mistaken For Wolves -Michael Heath Indianapolis Wildlife Advocacy| Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/wildlife-advocacy-in-indianapolis/hybrids-mistaken-for-wolves#ixzz1Cf0CHO4K

Read Full Post »


Wolves must work very hard to catch and kill their prey.  Prey is usually much larger and can fight back.  This famous study proves that every meal for wolves could be their last.  http://www.isleroyalewolf.org/overview/overview/wolves.html has provided the following information:
“For most North American and European humans eating a meal is a pretty simple affair: get some food from the cupboard, heat it up, and eat.  What if every meal required exerting yourself to the point of exhaustion, holding nothing back?  What if every meal meant risking serious injury or death?  Under these circumstances, you might be happy to eat only once a week or so – like Isle Royale wolves.
    Isle Royale wolves capture and kill, with their teeth, moose that are ten times their size.  Think about it for a moment – it is difficult to comprehend.  A successful alpha wolf will have done this more than one hundred times in its life.   Wolves minimize the risk of severe injury and death by attacking the most vulnerable moose.  Somehow wolves are incredible judges of what they can handle.  Wolves encounter and chase down many moose. Chases typically continue for less than ½ a mile.
    During chase and confrontation wolves test their prey.  Wolves attack only about 1 out of every ten moose that they chase down.  They kill 8 or 9 of every ten moose that they decide to attack.  The decision to attack or not is a vicious tension between intense hunger and wanting not to be killed by your food.
    Wolves typically attack moose at the rump and nose.  The strategy is to inflict injury by making large gashes in the muscle, and to slow the moose by staying attached, thereby allowing other wolves to do the same.  Eventually the moose is stopped and brought to the ground by the weight and strength of the wolves. The cause of death may be shock or loss of blood.  Feeding often begins before the moose is dead.
    A moose, with a wolf clamped to its rump is still formidable.  They can easily swing around, lifting the wolf into the air, and hurl the wolf into a tree.  Most experienced wolves have broken (and healed) their ribs on several occasions.  Moose deliver powerful kicks with their hooves.  Wolves occasionally die from attacking moose.”

Read Full Post »


Lynne Stone is the director of the Boulder-White Clouds Council and is an ardent advocate for wolves. This interview was conducted in September of 2009.

What do you know about the social structure of wolves?
Wolves are different from our other wildlife in Idaho in that they are pack animals. They have a very tight family structure. The pack is run by the breeding pair – also called the Alpha female and the Alpha male – and then the other members of the pack, say, the two and three year olds, help take care of the pups that are born in April. Also the yearlings help. 

Either the males or the females that are the leaders make the decisions about going out on a hunt and which prey to go after; and the rest of the pack follows in line. If one of the pack members ends up being injured, the pack will gather around and they will howl. They will bring them food. I have been around when there has been trapping and collaring going on, and I’ve heard the other pack members up in the timber just a little ways away howling for the wolf that is caught in the trap. And when the wolf is killed, there is a tremendous sorrow, and the howling that takes place then is really a howl of remorse and loss.

So, a lot different from black bears, a lot different from mountain lions, where the male in both of those animals is very much of a threat to the young. The wolves love the puppies, and they all like taking care of them and playing with them.

So, they are intelligent?
Wolves are so smart and intelligent and charismatic. You can’t help – I can’t help – but apply human traits to wolves, whether they are looking sad or curious. They are very curious about the world that is going on around them, and they might be attracted if you are hiking and you have your dog; they might come and sit and try and figure out what this very strange looking wolf is with this human.

And they are attracted to sounds. Sometimes we see wolves just sitting along highway 75 watching the traffic, just looking one way, looking the other way, and they have no idea what stir they cause in the world. They just want to have a life and live in this beautiful place where we have all this room for them and all this wildlife for them.

You are pretty passionate about wolves.
I am. I’m passionate about a lot of wildlife, but wolves right now are the ones that need the most help, the most outreach through education to the public, to help dismiss some of the myths around wolves. I’ve been around wolves a lot in the last four years living around Stanley. I mostly hike by myself and camp by myself. My dog is always with me. I respect the wolves. I try not to intrude where they have a den,or what is called a rendezvous site, where they are raising their pups. But sometimes I have just walked right in on them or – a couple of times they’ve walked right in on me – and we’re both just, ‘Whoa, and I usually go, who are you?’ If it’s like a Phantom Hill or Basin Butte pack, I’m familiar enough with those that I can try to figure out which one it is in the pack.

But shouldn’t you fear wolves?
I have absolutely no fear at all of wolves. If I see a black bear, that gets my attention. If I’m hiking in somewhere, and I see a bear, I might weigh on whether I want to keep going; the same way if I see mountain lion tracks. But with wolves, it doesn’t deter me from hiking. If I do hear a lot of howling, or I hear the pups howling with them, I’d like to give them a wide berth. I don’t want to disturb them at that time. But if wolves are on a kill, and you have your dog with you, it probably would be a good idea to not let your dog run out towards the wolves.

If you are in wolf country, which is becoming almost everywhere in Idaho or anywhere there is wildlife, your dog should be under voice control; and if you can’t keep him or her under control, then they should be on a leash, or you should go somewhere else and hike. But dogs are a problem chasing fawns and elk calves and birds. You should be aware when you are in the back country with your dog.

I have absolutely no fear at all of wolves. If I see a black bear, that gets my attention… But with wolves, it doesn’t deter me from hiking.

There have been a few cases where dogs have been killed by wolves. Usually those are hounds that are pursuing either mountain lions or black bears; and nine times out of ten the people who have those hounds know full well they are going into where the wolves are, and that is a risk you take when the pursuer becomes pursued and killed.

People used to complain about trying to save chinook salmon and sockeye salmon; and there were rallies against trying to do that. Well, now nobody talks about salmon anymore, because the wolves came in, in ’95 and ’96, and all the focus is on these big bad wolves. So, if we had grizzly bears, I think the wolves would just get off the hook immediately. So bring in the bears! Tell them to come on over.

What are your thoughts on a hunt?
I think it’s very poorly planned, and it’s all based on politics and not on science. Minnesota has over 3,000 wolves and has no plans to have a wolf hunt for at least 5 years; and when they do, there is going to be citizen input from all interests. The only people they listened to were the outfitters and the hunters. 

They have been itching to go kill wolves, and finally they have opened up this 7 month long hunting season. We don’t hunt any big game animal in Idaho for 7 months, but that is what we’re going to do with wolves in the Sawtooth zone, which goes all the way down to the backyard of Boise, and also in the Lolo up north. We’re going to be having wolves killed clear up until March 31st, pregnant females who are almost ready to den and have puppies. And wolves congregate towards the den sites. Most of them are very well known, and there is nothing to stop entire wolf packs from being killed in late March. This is absurd.

It’s criminal and I hope that Judge Don Malloy will rule to stop delisting before we get into this winter wolf hunting season and late spring.

The wolf hunt that Fish and Game is proposing is for 255 wolves. It is likely that more will be shot and not reported. You can have one wolf tag and take one wolf, but if you read the anti-wolf blogs, it’s all over the place that you can shoot as many as you want, you can only tag one. Of course, it’s illegal to shoot more than one, but there is not a whole lot of law enforcement out in this country, it’s so big.

Right now wolves are delisted from the Endangered Species Act, and they have almost no protection. The hunt now comes on top of the fact that a government agency called Wildlife Services has shot dozens and dozens of wolves this summer for conflicts with sheep and cattle. Also ranchers are given kill-on-sight permits.

We have twelve men right in Stanley who have shoot-on-sight for the Basin Butte wolves, up to three wolves, so ranchers no longer have to do anything to protect their livestock from predators including wolves, because the rules have all been relaxed and again, it’s politics.

And actually, I’m more concerned about Wildlife Services which has telemetry for the radio collared wolves, has airplanes and also has access to helicopters. They are much more efficient at killing wolves, including entire packs, than hunters will ever be. And then ranchers, because they don’t have to do anything to protect their animals – sheep are especially vulnerable and sheep are all over the mountains of Idaho, and when sheep get killed, then wolves die.

Shooting a wolf has got to be like shooting a dog, and they look about the same when they are lying there dead.

So we have these three things. We’ve got Wildlife Services killing wolves and ranchers and then hunters. Most of the wolves are going to be killed in the upcoming rifle season for deer and elk, and then wolves will be extremely vulnerable in the winter months when there is snow. A lot of wolves, if the hunt keeps going and isn’t stopped, will be shot off of snowmobiles, right like where we’re standing right here. I see a lot of wolves right in these mountains, and there is a lot of snowmobiling, and it might be illegal but that’s not going to stop it from happening.

I thought the number was 220.
It’s 220 plus 35 for the tribe, so the total number is 255; and Wildlife Services will probably kill 150 wolves this summer and fall. They are well on their way to that; plus another 100 will die of other causes, being poached, run over on the highway. So we well could lose over half of the wolves in Idaho by next spring. 

If that happens, we’re not going to have sustainability, we’re not going to have the genetic diversity. We need this genetic diversity. Right now there is a kill order out for the Steel Mountain pack and that Alpha male is from Yellowstone. He is one of the few wolves that made it from Wyoming to come clear over into the Smokey Mountains and because of sheep operations that have not been responsible for taking care of their sheep in the rugged mountains, we’re going to lose a whole pack including this male that is very valuable to the genetic diversity of Idaho wolves.

Is there any good that will come from the hunt?
I think there are two things. The wolves will become much more afraid of people. A lot of them will die before they ever get that chance to become afraid, especially the pups and the yearlings, because they’re not very smart. And number two, maybe it will satisfy this blood lust that these hunters – they just can’t wait to go out and get themselves a wolf. Maybe once they go out and they hunt, and they have a chance to maybe even shoot at one, even if it’s a pup, maybe sometime in the bar talk they can go, yeah I went wolf hunting and I shot at a wolf.

It’s like people I know who have gone and shot a moose. They said I never want to do that again. It’s like shooting a horse. Shooting a wolf has got to be like shooting a dog and they look about the same when they are lying there dead. And to shoot a young one and have the rest of the pack howling and upset, I just think most people, it’s going to be an experience that stays with them, and they could be sorry.

We’re not going to be overrun by wolves in Idaho. They are territorial. They live short, hard lives. In Yellowstone in the first ten years of all the collared wolves, the average age they lived was 3.4 years. The Basin Butte wolves – of the five pups that were born in 2006, four out of those five are now dead, and all of them have been shot.

No other species in the state is being managed as intensely and with such violence, killing and trapping them and shooting them from airplanes and helicopters.

So, here we’re living next to Stanley. Sawtooth National Recreation Area; it’s supposed to be a recreation area where wildlife has precedence over grazing. What a joke. What a joke. Cattle are king here, in case you haven’t noticed, and that will cause these wolves like Basin Butte to keep getting killed over and over and over again. They’ve already shot two over in Iron Creek this summer. They killed eight last year, Wildlife Services did, because ranchers just refused to try and learn to live with wolves.

So, for me, the bigger problem for wolves is not the hunting season. It’s Wildlife Services and it’s the livestock industry. They are much more efficient at killing wolves than hunters are going to be.

Why does Idaho need wolves? Why do people in Idaho need to see wolves?
They are the most interesting, intelligent, charismatic animal on the planet as far as I’m concerned, and we have 66% of the state that is public land. It belongs to all of us. We have record numbers of Rocky Mountain elk. We’ve got plenty of mule deer. Our wolves tend to eat mostly elk. In fact, right now there are depredation hunts going on in Idaho around ranches because the elk are eating the livestock feed and in the fields. So we’ve got plenty of country, we’ve got lots of wildlife.

Wolves are territorial. There’s only going to be one wolf pack around Stanley, there’s going to be one in the Sawtooth valley, there’s going to be one over in the Big Wood River valley around Ketchum, which is right now the Phantom Hill wolf. They are going to keep their numbers in check and through injury and being hit and being poached and getting sick – these are all things that canines in the wild have to deal with. We just lost all six pups of the Soldier Mountain pack. There are only three wolves left in that pack.

We’re just not going to be overrun. Most of the wolves that I have tracked through being a volunteer in the last four years are dead. In four years, they are all gone. I only have one left, the alpha female of the Basin Butte pack. Four of her daughters and sons have been killed, and I’ve seen that happen, and it is really hard, and it is because of the cattle grazing here.

If other animals are managed, why shouldn’t wolves be managed as well?
Wolves are definitely being managed, and they are being managed in a very heavy handed manner right now by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game. There are kill orders out all over Idaho for entire packs right here where we are standing. Basin Butte wolves and Sawtooth National Recreation area, they’ve killed two of them this summer. Three more are going to go down if Fish and Game has their way. No other species in the state is being managed as intensely and with such violence, killing and trapping them and shooting them from airplanes and helicopters. And when they do this, they don’t even know if it’s the wolf that ate the lamb. It doesn’t matter. They just go out and start shooting. So they are already being managed.

In Minnesota, 3,000 wolves. No hunting season. In Idaho, maybe 1,000 wolves, and the number is every day diminishing because of this heavy control we have, because of the poaching that is going on. And now we have this hunting season that is completely not based on science at all. And Fish and Game is going, suddenly there are not as many elk in the Sawtooth zone as we thought there were. Yesterday morning I saw 30 elk right by lower Stanley, and there were 12 calves with those elk. I saw a 5-point bull out highway 21 yesterday morning with several cows and calves.

Why are we killing these beautiful animals when we could be making money on them?

There are elk everywhere I go. There are 100 head out by Cape Horn, but yet they are using this as an excuse that our numbers are down. Yet Fish and Game has said for years, we don’t have winter range for elk. We don’t want elk wintering in the Sawtooth valley and Stanley. It’s one of the coldest places on earth. Elk shouldn’t be here in the winter. So now the wolves and the long hunting seasons have trimmed out the elk around Stanley, and now we’re going to trim out the wolves. Doesn’t make sense to me. It’s based on politics. It’s the Fish and Game commissioners, it’s the legislature, it’s Governor Otter. It’s not based on science at all.

Do you think there’s an economic advantage to having wolves in Idaho?
We’re sitting here in central Idaho with a lot of small towns that are struggling. Around Yellowstone, small towns are thriving, because people come to the Lamar Valley to see the wolves, the famous wolves. People come from all over the world to see the wolves. We could have that in Stanley and in Challis and Salmon and Ketchum. When the Phantom Hill wolves came into Sun Valley in March, hundreds of people got to see them. I spent all day talking to people about the wolves, answering questions and recruited other people to come and do that.

If the Phantoms can survive the hunting season – which will start October 1st and go to the end of the year – if they come down into Elkhorn and Sun Valley again like they did last winter, we can have people from all over the world come to see these beautiful black wolves – and to educate people. We should be capitalizing on the fact that we have these wolves in little places like Lowman and Banks and Idaho City.

But instead, people like me have to go out and make the wolves afraid of people so that they won’t get shot. And it hurts me when I do that, when I see beautiful wolves, and they are just playing or they are hunting a squirrel as they often do, and I take out my .243, and I start blasting and screaming at them to get them to run, because the next person who comes along could shoot them. And now they legally can shoot them.

We’re doing this so backwards. If this was I think almost any place else – if it was Oregon, or it was Washington, some place with a different idea of how we manage wildlife. Why are we killing these beautiful animals when we could be making money on them? And selling T-Shirts and coffee cups and putting bumper stickers on. And now, if you do that, you are likely to get your car vandalized. Or you are likely to get beaten up, if you have a wolf t-shirt on. Boy, we took a wrong turn somewhere here!

Wolves are great. They belong here. We just have to keep working to try to change the attitude. It’s probably not going to happen in my lifetime. It might happen in my son’s or my grandson’s lifetime, that people finally appreciate predators, including wolves.

**THANK YOU TO “WOLVES IN IDAHO” FOR PROVIDING THIS INFORMATION.  This interview can also be seen through the link below.

http://idahoptv.org/OUTDOORS/shows/wolvesinidaho/Lstone.cfm

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »