Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Wolf Current Events’ Category


“This week in Montana, hunters are allowed to shoot wolf puppies. Yes, puppies.

And tthey can shoot them in the most agonizingly cruel way of all, using bow and arrow.

And it’s all ‘legal’.

Whether you agree with arguments that support hunting for sport or not, most so-called ‘ethical’ hunters would agree a clean, fast kill is the goal – no matter what species is in the cross-hairs, and only in a ‘sportsmanlike way’ that gives the hunted animal a fair chance of escape.

While we won’t discuss the ethics of hunting per se, I do offer this video to consider – especially for those of strong Christian faith.

Whatever your personal take on hunting, what is ‘sportsmanlike’ in arrowing puppies?

Is it OK to kill babies using one of the slowest and most painful of hunting methods?

Dying from an archery wound can take – up to two WEEKS, according to Benke, and then only as a result of massive infection.

Watch the video. Please watch it now.

Does a puppy deserve to die this way? For that matter, does a deer, elk or any animal deserve to be sentenced to a long, agonizing death for the purposes of human ‘sport’?

Since the controversial politically-motivated delisting of endangered grey wolves resulted in open-season on wolves in several US states, including bow-hunting season beginning Sept. 3 in Montana, wolves have intentionally – and legally – been shot and killed – Although the actual statistcs and the numbers reported keep changing.

Bowhunting season is considered legal and is permitted – although perhaps not for much longer now that this video has been released.

And yes, unfortunately, certain backwards states are legalizing – even encouraging – the hunting of newborn wolf puppies as ‘Trophies’.

Even if you think it’s OK to hunt and kill truly helpless baby animals -puppies- for sport, is it OK to torture them first?

For some reason the general public seems to feel that bow-hunting is somehow more noble, more challenging, fair or more humane than hunting with firearms.

In this video a veteranarian describes the actual, prolonged and agonizing death these bow-shot animals actually experience.

Warning – This is graphic video. It was taken over the shoulder of a hunter – documenting his legal kill using a bow and arrow.

How many feel this kind of death is justifiable in the pursuit of ‘pleasure’? And what about for baby animals?

Should bow hunting remain legal?”

**Special thanks to Cathy Taibbi is based in Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America, and is Anchor for Allvoices for providing this information.

Read Full Post »


Jay Mallonee is a research biologist with a master’s degree in neurobiology/animal behavior. Through

his business of Wolf & Wildlife Studies, he has researched wolves in various states since 1992, along

with a 9-year study of the Fishtrap pack in northwest Montana (Project HOWL). Previous research has

included the documentation of traumatic stress displayed by a wild wolf placed into captivity, and

behavioral studies on rodents, primates, and a variety of cetaceans, such as gray whales and bottlenose

dolphins. Details of his studies can be found at

http://www.wolfandwildlifestudies.com. He also authored the book

Timber – A Perfect Life, that chronicles the profound 16 year journey with his canine companion.

Mallonee is a college professor and has taught a wide range of science classes for Michigan Tech

University, U. C. Santa Barbara, San Francisco State University, and several community colleges.  Below is a revealing article about how no sufficient data supports the wolf hunts!  Click on the link at the bottom to read the rest of his article and special thanks to the multiple sources he uses:

 

“Abstract

Management agencies have claimed that the recovery and public hunting of wolves is based in science.

A review of their statistics demonstrated that data collection methods did not follow a scientific protocol

which resulted in flawed and often blatantly incorrect data. Consequently, agencies do not know the

total number of wolves in Montana, a major reference point used by wolf managers. Therefore, the

quotas proposed for public wolf hunts are completely arbitrary, and management decisions in general

have not been based on facts. Management methods, and now hunting, contribute to the current

ecological crisis produced by the elimination and manipulation of predator species, which form the top

of food chains. These consumers produce a powerful “top-down” influence throughout ecosystems

which can even determine the surrounding vegetation species. Also reviewed were public attitudes

toward wolves, along with political approaches to solving the “wolf problem.” The total effect of these

processes has produced a wolf management system that lacks scientific perspective and does not utilize

what is known about the wolves’ role in sustaining healthy ecosystems. Instead, the data demonstrates

that management decisions have been based on agenda and propelled by opinion, bigotry, and politic.”  He adds, ”

Ultimately we have the greatest influence on how many deer, elk, wolves, and other predators are

present in our ecosystems. Until the current management paradigm changes, along with public attitude,

there is no permanent solution to the apparent “wolf problem.”

I can appreciate how hard FWP works to

obtain data on wolves and I know they do their best. Their best, however, is not science as they have

claimed.

Future solutions will have to take into account the full range of what science knows about

wolves. Until that happens, agendas, opinions, and politics will guide wolf management over problems

that are either mostly unknown (effects on prey populations) or rarely happen (depredations). This is a

social issue, not a biological one.”

http://www.wolfandwildlifestudies.com/downloads/huntingwolvesinmontana.pdf

Read Full Post »


“HELENA, Mont. (AP) — A federal appeals court on Thursday denied a request by environmental groups to halt wolf hunts that are scheduled to begin next week in Idaho and Montana.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the request by the Alliance for the Wild Rockies and other groups. The groups were seeking to cancel the hunts while the court considers a challenge to congressional action in April that stripped wolves of federal protections in Montana and Idaho, and in parts of Washington, Oregon and Utah.

Earlier this month, U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy in Missoula reluctantly upheld a budget rider that was inserted by Rep. Mike Simpson, R-Idaho, and Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont. It marked the first time since the passage of the Endangered Species Act in 1973 that Congress forcibly removed protections from a plant or animal.

Molloy ruled that the way Congress went about removing endangered species protections from the Northern Rockies gray wolf undermined the rule of law but did not violate the Constitution. Meanwhile, the environmental groups argued Congress’ actions were unconstitutional because they violated the principle of separation of powers.

“We lost the injunction, we have not lost the case,” Mike Garrity, executive director of the Alliance for the Wild Rockies, said of Thursday’s court ruling. “We will continue to fight to protect the wolves and enforce the separation of powers doctrine in the U.S. Constitution.”

Meanwhile, John Horning, executive director for WildEarth Guardians, one of the groups involved in the case, said, “We are discouraged we didn’t win a stay of execution for wolves, but we are cautiously optimistic that we will win our lawsuit to protect wolves from future persecution.”

Wolf hunts are scheduled to begin Aug. 30 in Idaho and Sept. 3 in Montana. Hunters in Montana will be allowed to shoot as many as 220 gray wolves, reducing the predators’ Montana population by about 25 percent to a minimum of 425 wolves.

In Idaho, where an estimated 1,000 wolves roam, state wildlife managers have declined to name a target for kills for the seven-month hunting season. They say the state will manage wolves so their population remains above 150 animals and 15 breeding pairs, the point where Idaho could attract federal scrutiny for a possible re-listing under the Endangered Species Act.”

*Special thanks to “San Antonio’s Home Page” for providing this information.

 

Read Full Post »


WOLF PRESERVATION IS OUTRAGED!  

Wolves have been stripped of their legal protections. 

Hunters are locked and loaded.   Traps are set.

Montana, Idaho, Wyoming among states looking to eradicate wolves.

This is not “responsible management” as Idaho Governor “Butch” Otter stated if he plans on wiping out more than 80% of the population.  Wolves have NO protection anymore.    It’s shoot on sight and animals are allowed to sit in painful traps for x72 hours!   Here’s what you need to do:  1. Express outrage toward each state governor and explain you are boycotting their state until they stop this madness (http://gov.idaho.gov/ourgov/contact.html, http://governor.mt.gov/cabinet/contactus.asp, http://governor.wy.gov/contactUs/Pages/default.aspx).  Spread this information to others and have them write to each governor.  Call your local newstation, newspaper, and pull together others for a wolf rally with signs (save wolves, boycott Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming, ect.). 

**Also, please watch the video through the link below and then visit “Friends of Animals” as they are fighting hard in court and through news stations to overturn extinction efforts.  We cannot save all these beloved wolves but we need to act now to save future packs from the same fate! 

Priscilla Feral, president of Friends of Animals: “Removing federal protection and subjecting wolves to more hunting is unconstitutional and unconscionable.”

http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/us/2011/08/12/jvm.wolves.endangered.list.hln

http://www.friendsofanimals.org/news/2011/august/howling-across-ameri.html

Read Full Post »


“LA GRANDE, Ore. — Two young wolves from the Imnaha pack have struck out for new territory, and the pack’s alpha female gave birth to at least one pup this year, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife said Monday.

No pups have been spotted in the Wenaha pack.

“Wolf packs are dynamic and rarely stay the same size over time,” noted Russ Morgan, ODFW wolf coordinator. “A pack can be healthy despite these natural fluctuations in numbers, as long as a breeding pair of wolves, the alpha male and female, is maintained.” 

Wolf pups are born in mid-April, with litters typically averaging four to six pups. The pups go outside the den and become more active beginning in June.

A state employee spotted the Imnaha pup July 16. No other pups have been seen this year, but wildlife managers said there could be more pups.

Biologists have also confirmed that two more young wolfs left the pack and moved to new areas.

A three-year-old male wearing a radio-tracking collar was located by biologists southeast of Fossil in Wheeler County at the end of July.

ODFW searched the area after a member of the public captured the image of a wolf on his trail camera in the west Blue Mountains. That particular had last been located north of Wallowa on May 10 in Wallowa County.

A second collared wolf, two-year-old male, swam across the Brownlee Reservoir on the Snake River into Idaho on July 18.

This brings to three the number of wolves known to have dispersed from the Imnaha pack. A female wolf went to Washington State last winter when she was 1 1/2 years old.

ODFW does not have evidence that any of these three collared wolves (OR-3, OR-5, OR-9) have joined a new wolf pack yet.

Other uncollared members of the Imnaha pack may have dispersed with the radio-collared wolves or gone their own way, wildlife managers said. The latest observations and data suggest the Imnaha pack now has four adult wolves (three of them with tracking collars), plus the new pup.

Trail cameras have captured images of four adult wolves from Oregon’s other established wolf population, the Wenaha pack, in the northern Blue Mountains area this summer. No pups were seen on the footage.

State biologists plan to monitor the pack for pups and to try and collar members from this pack.”

*Special thanks to KVAL News for providing this information!

Read Full Post »


“HELENA- Licenses for this year’s Montana wolf hunt are going up on sale on Monday, August 8th and they will be valid within 14 specifically defined wolf management units. It should be noted that hunters must obtain permission to hunt on private lands.

Hunters can purchase a wolf license online or from any FWP regional office or license provider. Hunters must have, or also purchase, a 2011 conservation license in order to take part in the upcoming wold hunt.

Wolf hunting licenses cost $19 for residents and $350 for nonresidents (If wolf opponents want outsiders to stay out of their business, then why do they offer outsiders an opportunity to hunt Montana Wolves?) The hunting season will close in a specific WMU when the quota is reached and Montana Fish Wildlife & Parks reports that if a WMU’s quota isn’t met, the wolf-hunting season will be extended in that area through December 31st. 

Hunters cannot use any motorized vehicle-including OHVs and snowmobiles-to hunt wolves and the use of dogs, bait, sent, lures, traps, lights, electronic tracking devices or any recorded or electrically amplified bird or animal calls to hunt or attract wolves is prohibited.

The total harvest quota is 220 wolves across 14 WMUs Two management units-WMUs 290 and 390 have subquotas. Montana is divided into 14 WMU and each has its own quota. FWP wildlife management areas are open to hunting during the fall wolf season and legally accessible State School Trust Land is also open to wolf hunting.

FWP advises that hunters by law must obtain permission to hunt private land and only tribal members may be allowed to hunt wolves on Indian Reservations. State Game Preserves, National Parks, and National Wildlife Refuges are closed to wolf hunting.

Hunters are required to call     1.877.FWP.WILD   (1.877.397.9453) to report harvests within 12 hours and to maintain possession of the hide and skull, hunters must by law personally present the tagged wolf hide and skull to a designated FWP employee within 10 days of the harvest for inspection. Evidence of the animal’s sex must remain naturally attached to the hide.

Hunters can call 1-800-385-7826  beginning September 3rd for the latest wolf-harvest status and closure information. Wolf hunting regulations are available via the FWP website at , and from most FWP license providers.”

*Information provided by:  KPAX/KAJ Media Center, 08/05/2011.

Read Full Post »


Finally!  Finally, a bit of positive news for wolves, a bill that doesn’t just compensate ANY livestock owner for a confirmed wolf predation but to those who are implementing non-lethal methods as deterents.   See the story below and share your comments!

Wednesday, August 3rd, 2011:

 John Kitzhaber, Oregon Governor,  signed the state wolf compensation bill Tuesday. It creates a $100,000 fund to pay ranchers who lose livestock to the legally protected wolves.

Aaron Kunz has reaction from those who could benefit from the newly established fund.

The Livestock Compensation and Wolf Co-Existence bill goes into effect right away with Kitzhaber’s signature. The funds will be given to eligible ranchers that lose livestock confirmed predated by wolves.

Eligible ranchers are those who utilize non-lethal methods to deter wolf attacks.

The group is hailing this new law as a demonstration of the state’s commitment to reducing conflicts between wolves and ranchers. 

Suzanne Stone is the conservation group’s northern Rockies representative. She says, “We are really very pleased with the signing of the bill. We worked very hard to get that legislation passed this year and felt it was a very solid compromise that brought both the ranching interests as well as the wildlife interests together.”

Ranchers in Eastern Oregon’s Wallowa County are among those who could benefit from this fund. Cattle rancher Ramona Phillips says it’s a good first step.

*More information can be found in Oregon’s Daily Astorian.

Read Full Post »


To further express my lifelong advocacy and support for the preservation of wolves, here is my first tattoo, the howling wolf!  Fantastic artwork created by “Angels and Demons Tattoo,” Art Without the Attitude (http://angelsanddemonstattoo.ning.com/) so go check them out!  As always, Wolf Preservation wants to hear what you think! 
 

Read Full Post »


“SALMON, Idaho, July 28 (Reuters) – Idaho will open its wolf
population, now estimated at about 1,000 animals, to extensive hunting and trapping to reduce their numbers to no fewer than
150 under a plan approved on Thursday by the state Fish and
Game Commission.

The move came after a heated public hearing Wednesday night
in Salmon, where wolf foes declared war on the iconic predators
with rhetoric describing Idaho as locked in a “wolf crisis” and
as one of three “wolf-occupied states” in the Northern Rockies,
along with Montana and Wyoming.

Wolves have been at the center of a bitter debate since
they were reintroduced to the region in the mid-1990s over the
objections of ranchers and commercial outfitters who said
wolves would prey on cattle and compete with hunters for elk.

The plan to cut the wolf population in Idaho comes just
three months after wolves in Idaho and Montana were stripped of
federal protections under the Endangered Species Act through an
unprecedented act of Congress.

Removal from the U.S. endangered species list turned
control of those wolves over to state wildlife agencies, now
free to set hunting seasons as a way of reducing wolf numbers
to levels they see as better balanced with human interests.

In Montana, wildlife managers earlier this month set a
statewide quota of 220 wolves — out of an estimated population
of 566 — for its wolf hunts, which will generally run from
September to November.

Idaho’s commissioners, by comparison, approved a plan that
sets no quota for a combination of hunting and trapping that
will be allowed for most of the year in most of the state,
beginning next month.

However, Idaho would bar wolf numbers statewide from
falling in any given year below the 150 minimum necessary to
prevent federal re-listing of them.

The action in Idaho comes as a federal judge in Montana is
poised to rule on a lawsuit by environmental groups challenging
the de-listing of wolves in both states earlier this year.

DUELING NUMBERS

The commissioners said their aim is to lower the number of
conflicts between wolves and livestock in the state and to end
wolf-caused declines of elk in some parts of Idaho where
outfitters have complained they are losing clients because of
unsuccessful hunts for elk and other big game.

Still, a recent survey by state wildlife managers shows elk
populations exceed or meet biologists’ objectives in the vast
majority of Idaho’s hunting areas. Another study by wildlife
managers shows Idaho wolves killed 148 cows in 2010, out of a
total 2.2 million head of cattle in the state.

Idaho game commissioners characterized their plan as a good
starting point, with future plans to include wolf trapping and
killing by designated state agents and by landowners.

“We will increase the tools in the toolbox and use all
legal mechanisms to solve the problem,” commission chairman
Tony McDermott told wolf opponents on Wednesday night. “We’re
on the same page and we’ll get it done.”

At the meeting Thursday in Salmon, commissioners also cut
the price of non-resident wolf hunting tags statewide from
about $186 to $31.75 as an incentive to out-of-state hunters.

Wildlife advocates on Thursday vowed to launch a boycott of
Idaho, its potatoes and its outfitters.

“The word is getting out that this is basically a wolf-hate
state,” Idaho wolf activist Lynne Stone said. “I think this is
going to be a big hit to the image of Idaho and further hurt
our economy.”

(Editing by Steve Gorman and Peter Bohan)

**Thanks to Laura Zuckerman, Reuters, for providing this information!

Read Full Post »


“WASHINGTON (July 27th, 2011)— In a victory for imperiled species, the U.S. House of Representatives today voted not to include the “extinction rider” in an appropriations bill that would have stopped the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service from spending any money to protect new species under the Endangered Species Act or to designate “critical habitat” for their survival. The House voted 224-202 in favor of an amendment from Rep. Norm Dicks (D-Wash.) to strip the “extinction rider” from the Interior department’s appropriation bill. “The extinction rider would have been a disaster for hundreds of animals and plants across the country that desperately need the help of the Endangered Species Act to survive,” said Noah Greenwald, endangered species program director for the Center for Biological Diversity. “Today’s vote is a promising sign for wolverines, walruses and species in all 50 states that, without help, face the very real prospect of extinction.” The vote comes as plants and animals across the country are at heightened risk of extinction due to habitat destruction, global climate change, extreme weather events and other factors. Earlier this month the Center and the Fish and Wildlife Service reached a landmark agreement to speed protection for 757 imperiled U.S. species, including the wolverine, Pacific walrus, Rio Grand cutthroat trout and Mexican gray wolf. The passage of today’s bill would have delayed protection for those species and made their recovery more difficult. “While the vote on the extinction rider shows that the Endangered Species Act enjoys support from both sides of the aisle, the House is still threatening wide-spread environmental damage with other amendments to this spending bill,” Greenwald said. “We can’t allow these measures to move ahead that will pollute our air and water, threaten public health and destroy pristine landscapes.” Among the measures still under consideration in the House are those that would: * Stop more than 1 million acres around the Grand Canyon from being protected from new uranium mines; * Force the Environmental Protection Agency to stop all work limiting carbon dioxide pollution from power plants, refineries and other large pollution sources; * Halt efforts under the Clean Water Act from protecting human health and endangered species from pesticides; * Block EPA oversight of mountaintop removal coal mining in Appalachia; * Interfere with the Environmental Protect Agency’s work to protect the public from toxic coal ash; * Hinder the EPA’s and U.S. Corps of Engineers’ work to protect wetlands and other waters of the United States; * Expedite air-pollution permits for offshore drilling in the Arctic The full appropriations bill for the Interior department is expected to be voted on by the House in the coming days. If it passes, it moves to the Senate. Last week, the White House signaled plans to veto the spending bill because of amendments that threaten wildlife, the environment, and clean air and water.”

**Special thanks to “Lobos of the Southwest” for providing this information!

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »