Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Wolf Current Events’ Category



“Wildlife officials have shot and killed five wolves from a helicopter in the Clearwater Basin’s Lolo region since Wednesday.

Shooters for the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Wildlife Services stooped Friday, saying weather conditions were no good for firing at the wolves from a helicopter.

Idaho Fish and Game biologists have recommended wolf numbers be reduced in the Lolo Zone to help struggling elk populations.

Wolves in the northern Rocky Mountains were removed from the federal endangered species list more than a week ago and Idaho once again has authority to manage the animals.

In crafting plans for a public hunt this fall, the Idaho Fish and Game Commission is expected to set its goal for the wolf population at somewhere below 500 next week. Biologists estimate there are some 700 to 1,000 wolves in the state.

Fish and Game hopes to reduce wolf numbers to between 20 and 30 wolves in the two big game units that make up the Lolo zone. (Idaho Statesman)”

*Special thanks to Jason Ford of (http://www.koze950.com/2011/05/13/five-wolves-shot-in-idaho’s-lolo-zone-from-helicopter/) for providing this information.

Read Full Post »


Wolf Advocates, IT IS TIME TO UNITE NOW MORE THAN EVER. Please send a short message to Idaho Governor Butch Otter (http://gov.idaho.gov/ourgov/contact.html) and Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer (http://governor.mt.gov/cabinet/contactus.asp) to respecfully protest this insane wolf hunt. Be persistent and keep writing them often!

Thanks to Kim Murphy, Los Angeles Times, for providing the following information:

“A congressional budget bill rider takes wolves off the endangered species list in the two states. Hunters are happy, but wildlife advocates are outraged.

Reporting from Stanley, Idaho— It used to be you could look across the ridge from Ron Gillett’s house and a couple of dozen elk would be foraging for grass. Then you’d hear a scary kind of howling, and the elk would take off, a pack of wolves close on their heels.

It got so that Gillett couldn’t stand to see the spindly elk calves fall into the wolves’ hungry embrace — not when hunting elk has been part of his livelihood for much of his life. He’d get screaming mad at wolf advocates who came to watch in wonder as the packs executed their skillful and deadly dances around their prey.

“When I see a cow elk with her guts hanging out, and a little calf that’s been hamstrung — I know I’m on the right side. No question about it,” Gillett said. “These Canadian wolves are the most cruel, vicious predators in North America.”

Now the days of talking compromise are over, he said. “We’re killing ’em.”

A week after Congress quietly passed a budget rider requiring wolves to be removed from the endangered species list in Idaho and Montana, state officials are preparing to draw up plans for new wolf hunts.

Idaho Gov. C.L. “Butch” Otter, a Republican, just signed an emergency law authorizing him to declare a wolf “disaster.” Gillett and others hope that is a prelude to county sheriffs setting up posses to take out wolf packs that have fed on dwindling elk herds.

There has perhaps been no more contentious issue in the modern West than the federal government’s reintroduction of wolves 16 years ago into the northern Rockies. Their number has grown to at least 1,700 and sparked fiercely competing narratives of the relationship between ranchers, hunters, wildlife and wilderness.

This month, years of litigation and tense political standoffs concluded in a flash, with a little-discussed rider attached to the must-pass federal budget bill by Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.) and Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho).

The law requires the Interior Department within 60 days to remove northern Rockies wolves from the endangered species list everywhere but Wyoming, where negotiations continue, and specifically prevents the courts from intervening.

Though conservation groups launched a desperate battle to defeat the measure, “it took everybody a while to realize just how little support wolves had in Congress,” said Louisa Willcox, a Natural Resources Defense Council wildlife advocate in Montana.

Idaho officials said they had no immediate plans to exercise the emergency declaration. They said they would probably wait for an organized hunting season similar to one in 2010, when the federal Endangered Species Act designation was briefly lifted and 188 wolves in Idaho were shot by hunters.

But wolf advocates fear that the congressional green light will result in a virtual open season on wolves in Idaho that could kill so many that the animals — whose population in the state declined 19% last year to 700 even under federal protection — may ultimately be thrown back into danger of extinction.

“It’s going to be ugly. They’re talking about trapping, baiting, snaring, electronic calls,” said Lynne Stone, a representative of the Boulder-White Clouds Council, a wilderness advocacy group in Ketchum. “I’m trying to steel myself for it, figure out how I’m going to handle it. But I’m sitting here feeling like I’m living in a nightmare.”

Stone has spent years documenting the movements of wolves in the nearby Sawtooth Wilderness and the mountains around Sun Valley. But these days, there isn’t much to see. The Idaho hunt in 2010, combined with road kill and a shooting by federal Wildlife Services agents, wiped out most of the Phantom Hill pack near Ketchum.

Conflicts with ranchers near Stanley had prompted federal agents to take out many of the 13 wolves in the Soda Butte pack there the previous fall, and after hunters shot three more, only one Soda Butte wolf remained. “He’s still up there,” Stone said.

She has become much more wary about driving out to Stanley, where she once lived. Gillett, who leads a group popularly known as the Idaho Anti-Wolf Coalition, was charged with assault in 2008 when he was accused of shoving Stone and grabbing her camera. The case ended in a hung jury.

“We’re hoping people can see what kind of circus is going on here,” said Garrick Dutcher, spokesman for Living With Wolves, a documentary film project that captured the rituals and habits of a pack of wolves in the Sawtooth Wilderness. “I’m not aware of any time when an animal was a cause for a state emergency disaster declaration. I mean, that’s when the National Guard gets called in, right? It’s really just a call to arms, a rallying cry, for wolf haters.”

Yet many Idaho residents say elk in Idaho — a mainstay of the hunting economy — are down 20%. Hunters booking at Gillett’s cabins are a fraction of what they once were. Many say it’s easier to admire wolves when they aren’t stealing through your pastures and driveways at night.

Karen Calisterio told a state Senate committee considering the wolf emergency law this month that she was approached in November in her driveway in the northern town of Tensed by four large wolves. “For 18 long, horrifying minutes, I was trapped,” she said. “They had plenty of open space to run into in all directions, and yet they kept advancing on me as I was screaming into my cellphone.” (So the wolves didn’t attack even after 18 minutes?)

That Idaho and Montana will kill wolves later this year appears beyond doubt. The question is how many. That will be determined by state wildlife managers in the coming months.

Conservationists have said there are barely enough wolves now to ensure their survival.

Gillett makes no bones about how many he wants here. “Zero,” he said.”

Read Full Post »


What does a budget bill have to do with killing wolves?

Absolutely nothing.

But hatred of these animals has become so out of control that the gray wolf will become the first creature ever taken off the U.S. endangered species list by an act of Congress, rather than by scientific review, under legislation sent to the White House on Thursday. IT’S TIME TO UNITE PRO-WOLFERS! WRITE YOUR STATE SENATORS AND DEMAND THEY TAKE ACTION AGAINST THE KILLING OF OVER ONE THOUSAND WOLF FAMILIES, INCLUDING PUPS.

The Associated Press reports the following,
“BILLINGS, Mont. – Federal wildlife officials say they will take more than 1,300 gray wolves in the Northern Rockies off the endangered species list within 60 days.

An attachment to the budget bill signed into law Friday by President Barack Obama strips protections from wolves in five Western states.

It marks the first time Congress has taken a species off the endangered list.

Idaho and Montana plan public wolf hunts this fall. Hunts last year were canceled after a judge ruled the predators remained at risk.

Protections remain in place for wolves in Wyoming because of its shoot-on-sight law for the predators.

There are no immediate plans to hunt the small wolf populations in Oregon and Washington. No packs have been established in Utah.”

Read Full Post »


Wolf packs, including PUPS, are closer to extermination by greedy politicians and wolf haters. Please make your voice loud……NOW! It’s time to step it up wolf supporters!

Thanks to Wolf Warriors (http://howlingforjustice.wordpress.com/2011/04/10/its-crunch-time-warriors/) for providing this CRITICAL information:
“Capital Switchboard Numbers – give the name of the Senator & you will be transferred to their office. You will then either speak to a staff member, or on the weekend – to voice mail.
When possible ask to speak to each Senator’s environmental aide. This will give you a better chance to get your message across because you will be talking to someone who is familiar with the issue.

CAPITAL SWITCHBOARD

1,866.220.0044
1.877.851.6437
1.800.833.6354
Be polite but express your outrage over the game of chess Congress is playing with wolves’ lives. The delisting language must be stripped out of the final bill.”

Read Full Post »


Bow hunting wolves in Montana and Idaho and discouraging people not to arrest poachers.  We cannot stand for this!

Thanks to “Howling for Justice” for providing the following information:

“This is the face of trophy hunting, a wolf brutally shot to death for sport. A painful, horrific death.

Wolves don’t go quietly. Can you imagine this happening to your beloved dog?  Since wolves and dogs share 99.8 percent of their DNA, it’s not hard to do.

I know it’s disturbing but this is what Montana and Idaho wolves are facing if the deal, brokered by the “10 settling groups” and USFWS. becomes reality. Or if Congress tacks a delisting rider onto the budget bill.  Or if one of the myriad of anti-wolf bills squeaks through, all wolves could be delisted. Either way, wolves are under attack from all sides. It’s up to us to continue to fight for them.

The budget extension in Congress ends on April 8th. There could be another attempt to push a wolf delisting rider through. We have to gear up for the next  push. I know everyone is emotionally exhausted, especially since the “settlement” was revealed on March 18th but that is out of our hands, it’s Judge Molloy’s decision. We have to focus on Congress and their wolf delisting antics.

In 2010 Montana added a wolf archery and back country wolf rifle  season to their hunt. They also raised their quota from 75 to 186 wolves.  Idaho’s bag of tricks included calling, baiting and trapping wolves, allowing snares and leg hold traps.

Who knows how much worse it will get?  Idaho Governor Otter made these statements in October 2010.

Idaho Governor Rejects ESA Wolf Management

Posted on: 10/24/10

In another salvo of the wolf-wars, Idaho’s Governor Otter has ordered state wildlife managers to “relinquish their duty to arrest poachers or to even investigate when wolves are killed illegally.” Under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) Idaho wildlife officials are the “designated agent” for investigating wolf deaths in the state.

This means Idaho Department of Fish and Game managers will no longer perform statewide monitoring for wolves, conduct investigations into illegal killings, provide law enforcement when wolves are poached or participate in a program that responds to livestock depredations. “

http://howlingforjustice.wordpress.com/2011/03/26/montana-and-idaho-wolves-abandoned/

Read Full Post »


 As always, Wolf Preservation invites you to comment on this article and take action!

In Gallitin National Forest (Bozeman, Montana), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service found an illegally killed wolf .  They are offering a reward for information leading to the arrest of the culprit.  To see the article, visit http://www.kxnet.com/getArticle.asp?ArticleId=748992

Wolf Preservation responded by writing  Montana Senator Ken Miller, who’s stance on wolves is to “KILL EM’ ALL!”  Here is a copy of the letter:

Ken Miller,
How do you feel about the illegal killing of wolves, as the individual in this article has done? How much effort is being put into the capture of the person who conducted the illegal shooting of the wolf?
Wolf Preservation challenges you stand up for the “honesty,” and “integrity” you so love to splash all over your webpage. Do you condone breaking the law in order to satisfy your lust for killing these predators and how is that “integrity?”

Michael Heath, Wolf Advocate and Educator, Founder of Wolf Preservation.

**Please write to Montana Senator Ken Miller (http://miller4governor.com/contact/) and ask him how much effort is being put into the capture of the person who conducted the illegal shooting of the wolf? 

Read Full Post »


Fish and Game Officials say trapping and killing 9 wolves have reduced chances of an attack.  However, there is no indication, other than “boldness,” that any attack occurred on people.   After reading this article,  Wolf Preservation wants to hear your comments!  Reporter Mike Campbell from The Bellingham Herald reported the following information:

“Alaska Department of Fish and Game regional supervisor Mark Burch said the effort to remove wolves considered dangerous to humans and their pets succeeded. All the wolves that were killed were on base property.

“We believe we’ve mitigated the risk,” said Burch, who added that one wolf died after being hit by a car not connected to the control effort. “We’re not trying to eradicate wolves; we’re trying to reduce the risk.”

He estimates four wolves remain in the area.

As spring approaches, trapping conditions worsen and bears begin emerging from their dens, hastening the end of the program.

But some contend the wolves didn’t pose much risk to begin with.

“I’m not a biologist in any way, shape or form,” said Gary Gustafson, chairman of Chugach State Park Citizens’ Advisory Board, which criticized Fish and Game for nearly wiping out the wolf population in that portion of the half-million-acre park. “But what’s troublesome to us is that the department has decided one size fits all and that the plan is to exterminate all wolves.”

Burch disagrees, saying that wolves often repopulate areas quickly.

“We want and expect other wolves to move into the area,” he said. “We know how valuable that is for diversity.”

 PUBLIC SAFETY CONCERNS

Fish and Game and base wildlife officers say there was a clear pattern of increasingly bold wolf behavior. Last November, a man walking his dogs on base was briefly surrounded by four wolves. Two women running on Artillery Road with a dog nearly a year ago were treed for about two hours.

Some homeowners in the Eagle River area have reported their pets killed by wolves.

“It’s not common for wolves to become aggressive toward people, but when they do, it’s a public safety issue,” Burch said. “While wolf attacks on humans are rare, this lack of fear and aggression is the kind of behavior seen by wolves that have attacked people in the past — so we are doing what we can to minimize the risks.”

Pete Panarese, another member of the advisory board and a former state parks deputy director, thinks the fears are overblown.

“If somebody sees a wolf and it just looks at them and doesn’t run away, is that grounds to shoot the wolf?” he asked. “Sometimes wolves, when they show up, they’re checking something out to see if it will go away. They’re predators, looking at you to see what you’re going to do. A very small number of them keep pushing the envelope.”

Food, trash, unsecured dog food and habitation to humans tends to draw them in, Panarese added.

Burch agreed.

“We have suspicions some of those (wolves) were intentionally fed by people and, of course, we hope that won’t happen,” he said. That didn’t change what he considered his obligation to act.

“We had a public safety threat that was ongoing,” he said. “Something could happen, and somebody could get hurt. We don’t dither with public safety.”

However, he noted Fish and Game had not received a single wolf complaint in Anchorage so far this year.

 MONITORING MODE

The wolf-control project was a partnership between Fish and Game and Joint Base Elmendorf Richardson. Burch said the state spent $12,374, mostly in staff time.

“If there’s a public safety problem, we should give wide discretion to Fish and Game to deal with it,” said Kneeland Taylor, a board member with the Alaska Wildlife Alliance. Taylor’s bigger concern is a proposal before the Alaska Board of Game, meeting in Anchorage today, to open the far reaches of Chugach State Park to wolf hunting and trapping.

The wolves killed ranged from about 65 pounds to 115 pounds, said state biologist Sean Farley. He and his colleagues will examine bone, hair and tissue samples in an effort to learn more about the wolves’ diet. Hides will be sold at the next Fur Rendezvous fur auction.

The winterlong control effort is over for now, but the state may not be done killing wolves.

“We’re moving to more of a monitoring mode,” Burch said. “But Fish and Game employees continue to have authority to take wolves opportunistically by shooting if in their judgment it’s appropriate. It’s the same judgment that’s involved with dealing with moose, bears and wolves on a daily basis. The public accepts the judgment of professionals on matters like this that involve public safety.”

A glimpse into the public attitudes towards wildlife in Anchorage can be gleaned from a survey conducted for Fish and Game last year using telephone interviews and focus groups.

When asked what was the most important wildlife issue facing Anchorage residents, 56 percent pointed to increasing wildlife numbers in populated areas. Most singled out moose and bears. Only 1 percent mentioned wolves.

At the same time, about 70 percent of those surveyed thought Anchorage residents should learn to live with some conflicts or problems with wildlife. Just 17 percent agreed with a statement that some wildlife is dangerous and that they did not want potentially dangerous species in town.”

Wolf Preservation encourages you to contact Fish and Game Regional Supervisor Mark Burch.  Please be respectful but tell him how your feel about killing these nine wolves. 

Alaska Department of Fish and Game
Division of Wildlife Conservation
333 Raspberry Road
Anchorage, AK 99518-1599
(907) 267-2257 phone
(907) 267-2433 fax

Mark Burch, Regional Supervisor (mark.burch@alaska.gov)

Read Full Post »


  “Wolf Warriors” on Facebook reports the following:

“ALERT: Anti-Wolf bill in Helena! Please contact your MT legislators

On Thursday, March 24, at 9am, the Montana Senate Finance & Claims Committee will hear testimony on SB 414, the Montana Wolf Control Act. Among other things, this bill wil…l make it legal to shoot wolves at any time on private land, even without a hunting license. This bill will diminish the success of wolf recovery in Montana, while seriously undermining Montana’s federally-approved wolf management plan!

We believe wolves should be managed like other native wildlife, as a valuable part of Montana’s wildlife heritage, not as pests to be destroyed.

Please contact the Senate Finance & Claims committee in Helena and urge them to VOTE NO on SB 414.

Background on SB 414 (Sponsored by Sen. Chas Vincent).

* Prevents Montana game wardens from investigating or citing anyone who kills a wolf when wolves are protected under the Endangered Species Act.

* Allows wolves to be killed on private land at any time without a license, once wolves have been delisted.

* Requires Montana FWP to kill entire packs in response to any livestock depredation or reductions in elk herd numbers, while wolves are protected under the ESA, as long as there are at least 15 breeding pairs in the state.

* Forces the Attorney General to sue the federal government for “economic damages” to livestock and big game caused by wolves.

Nearly a dozen other wolf-related bills have already been drafted in Helena, and are moving through the process. Besides increasing the killing of wolves in Montana, these bill hearings provide a forum for anti-wolf types to vilify wolves, carnivores, and endangered species generally.

That is why your legislators in Helena need to hear from you!

**Please contact the Senate Finance & Claims committee and let them know you oppose SB 414**

You can also call the capitol at 444-4800 and leave a message for the Senate Finance & Claims Committee.

I’ve pasted some more talking points below. Please feel free to put them into your own words. Also, if you would like to attend a hearing at the Capitol in Helena, please contact me for more information.

Thank you for speaking up for wolves and Montana’s wildlife heritage!

[If the links do not work in this message, please copy and paste this address you’re your browser window: http://leg.mt.gov/css/sessions/62nd/legwebmessage.asp ]’

Read Full Post »


Some key issues wolves face are possible delisting in New Mexico and Arizona, where they already remain at low numbers.   Hopefully, a plan will be implemented to guarantee their survival and growth.  After reading this article, Wolf Preservation wants your feedback.  What do you think? 

Credit for the information provided below goes to William Campbell, Associated Press:

 

“BILLINGS, Mont. — A proposal to settle years of litigation and allow public hunting of wolves in parts of the Northern Rockies faces its first legal test on Thursday, as it goes before a federal judge who has twice rebuffed attempts to lift protections for the predators.

The hearing before U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy in Missoula follows a settlement agreement last week between the Obama administration and 10 conservation groups. 

Facing pressure from Western lawmakers in Congress, the groups agreed to give up their fight to keep almost 1,300 wolves on the endangered list in Idaho and Montana. In exchange, the government would retain protections at least temporarily for about 400 wolves in Wyoming, Oregon, Washington and Utah.

Molloy has rejected past government decisions on wolves that he said were politically motivated. He is being asked to do so again by several wildlife advocacy groups that refused to sign off on the settlement with the administration.

An attorney for one of the dissenting groups referred to the deal as “political theater” that would scuttle prior legal victories by wolf advocates.

“The settling plaintiffs would give up their right to challenge any new delisting rule for five years – during which time untold numbers of wolves could be unnecessarily and unlawfully killed,” attorney Summer Nelson wrote in a brief filed by the Western Watersheds Project.

Bounty hunting and poisonings killed off wolves throughout most of the continental U.S. early last century.

A fledgling population in Montana expanded dramatically beginning in the mid-1990s, when the federal government brought in 66 of the animals from Canada and reintroduced them to central Idaho and northwestern Wyoming.

The population has leveled off in recent years, in part because government wildlife agents now kill more than 200 wolves annually in response to attacks on livestock.

Biologists this year recorded the first drop since restoration efforts began. Declines in some of the region’s big game herds and continued livestock attacks have spurred calls to further reduce the population.

Supporters of the settlement said they want to get past two decades of legal battles over wolves in the West. At the same time, they are trying to pre-empt wolf legislation before Congress that could have broader implications for other plants and animals protected under the Endangered Species Act.

“It should give everybody in the region who’s dealing with wolves a way to think about them long-term. It’s all been so haphazard up until now,” said Mike Clark with the Greater Yellowstone Coalition, one of the 10 groups involved in the settlement.

For the deal to go forward, Molloy must agree to suspend a ruling last August in which the judge faulted the Fish and Wildlife Service for a 2009 decision that took wolves off the endangered list in Montana and Idaho but not neighboring Wyoming.

Wyoming has a law that allows wolves to be shot on sight across most of the state. Federal wildlife officials said that Montana and Idaho had acceptable wolf management plans, but Wyoming’s was too hostile to the species to ensure its continued survival.

Molloy said the recovery of wolves across the region was incomplete if they remained in danger in Wyoming. He said federal wildlife laws do not allow for recovery decisions to be based on political boundaries.

Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks attorney Robert Lane said Molloy may be willing to reconsider given the settlement’s assurances that wolves would not be hunted to extermination.

As part of the agreement with the Obama administration, the Department of Interior would conduct an independent review of the animal’s status within four years. In the meantime, Idaho and Montana could resume hunts for the animals that were suspended after just one season.

“It’s sort of like a test drive for state management” of wolves, Lane said of the settlement.

If Molloy agrees to let the settlement go forward, it also must clear the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, where the federal government has been pursuing an appeal of Molloy’s August order.

Democratic and Republican lawmakers from the region have vowed to keep pressing their bills to delist wolves at least until the settlement is finalized.

Some of those measures would go much farther than last week’s settlement and delist wolves nationwide. That would include wolves in parts of Arizona and New Mexico, where only a few dozen of the animals survive despite a costly government restoration program.”

Read Full Post »


“Since last fall, it has become increasingly likely that Congress would pass legislation that would be disastrous for wolves and the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Although Defenders has steadfastly opposed that legislation, we became convinced that the only real hope of stopping it was to reach a settlement of the litigation we brought in 2009 successfully challenging Interior Secretary Ken Salazar’s illegal decision to remove federal protection from wolves in the Northern Rockies.

Accordingly, on March 18, 2011, we joined with nine other conservation organizations in filing with the U.S. District Court in Montana a settlement agreement we negotiated with the Interior Department. Like any settlement agreement, this one is a compromise, but one that we are convinced was necessary to help avert what could easily be the most disastrous assault on the ESA since that monumental law took effect nearly four decades ago. We are also convinced that, if the agreement is approved by the court and all parties live up to their responsibilities, it will provide a path in which wolves will continue to recover in the Northern Rockies and science, not politics, will prevail.

Whatever happens now, we will continue to lead the effort both for wolves and the ESA going forward. Below you will find more detailed answers to questions about the settlement and what our next steps will be to ensure the long-term future of wolves across the Northern Rockies.

All of us at Defenders of Wildlife are extremely grateful for your continued support in our ongoing efforts to save America’s wolves.

Sincerely,
Rodger Schlickeisen”

**Please respond with your thoughts! 

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »