Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Wolf Current Events’ Category


Two wolves have been ordered killed, even though Montana Wildlife Officials admit they may not be responsible for killing a yearling calf!  Please read and contact Dir. Joe Maurier, Ken McDonald and Liz Bradley.
jmaurier@MT.gov , kmcdonald@MT.gov …, LBradley@mt.gov Tell them NO!

Perry Backus of the Ravalli Republic reported the following information:

“Wolves killed a yearling calf in the Lake Como area earlier this month and wildlife officials have ordered that the pair of wolves responsible be killed.

So far this year, livestock depredations by wolves are at the lowest point wildlife officials have recorded in the last 10 years.

From Jan. 1, wolves have killed four cows and one dog statewide.

Over the same time period in 2009, wolves killed 17 cattle, three llamas, one dog and injured a calf.

Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks wolf management specialist Liz Bradley said there is no way to know for certain why wolves mostly steered clear of livestock this winter.

It’s not because wolf numbers have decreased.

In 2010, wolf numbers grew by 8 percent in Montana. Biologists reported 566 wolves in 108 packs in the state, with at least 35 breeding pairs.

The long winter and heavy snow could be partially responsible.

“After a hard winter and heavy snow, game is typically in worse shape and they may be easier to kill,” Bradley said.

Control actions may have also thinned wolf numbers in areas most susceptible to livestock depredation.

A large number of wolves were removed from the Big Hole area over the past two years due to conflicts with livestock.

“We’ve had two depredations in the Big Hole this winter,” Bradley said. “That’s generally one of those areas where there are depredations in the winter because most of the wildlife migrates out of there.”

Overall, the largest amount of conflict between wolves and livestock occurs in the spring during calving season. The fewest happen over the winter months because most cattle and sheep are off open ranges.

Bradley said it’s not clear whether or not members of the Lake Como pack were responsible for the recent depredation.

Officials found two sets of tracks near the calves’ carcass.

“We don’t know whether those two are a newly formed pair or part of the Lake Como pack,” she said.

There is no radio collar on a wolf in the Lake Como pack, which included six wolves last year.

There are currently 12 known packs that use the Bitterroot area at least part of the year.

There could be more.

Bradley encourages the public to report any sightings of wolves or their tracks to Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks. The reports can be made to local FWP offices or via the Internet on the FWP’s website: http://fwp.mt.gov/wildthings/management/wolf/wolfObservationForm.html.

“We are continuing to track new pack formations,” Bradley said. “That’s why it’s important to get information from the public, especially this time of year.”

Wolves den and have pups in April. They are much more localized during the pup rearing season.

“We track all of the public reports, especially activity in new areas,” she said. “We’re looking for a cluster in reports. Maybe someone saw some tracks or someone else heard some howling.”

“All of that kind of stuff adds up,” Bradley said.

Wolves have been in Montana for a while now and are more commonplace.

“People tell me that they don’t know if we care about this kind of information anymore,” she said. “I really do.”

Read Full Post »


John Motsinger, a Communications Associate at Defenders of Wildlife who  handles press coverage for critters in the Northern Rockies as well as Defenders’ national work on coal ash and pesticides has provided the following information:

“Wolf settlement reached in Northern Rockies – Defenders of Wildlife and nine other conservation groups reached a settlement agreement with the Interior Department regarding wolf recovery and management in the Northern Rockies. The settlement was filed for approval with a U.S. Federal District Court in Montana.

Though not a perfect solution, this settlement allows wolf delisting in the two states with approved wolf management plans (Montana and Idaho) to move forward, while retaining protections for the most vulnerable wolves in the Northern Rockies. The settlement also offers a workable solution to the increasingly polarized debate over wolves without resorting to legislation that would be bad for wolves, the ESA and countless other species.

This agreement adopts a scientific approach – including monitoring of the status of wolves and independent scientific review – to ensure that states maintain healthy wolf populations. If approved, it will be up to the states to hold up their end of the bargain and manage wolves responsibly and sustainably as they do for other wildlife.”

**Wolf Preservation appreciates your questions and comments.

Read Full Post »


“In his recent “A 21st Century Strategy for America’s Great Outdoors” announcement, President Obama emphasized the urgency for the Federal government to “Use science-based management practices to restore and protect our lands and waters for future generations.”

To support this vision, Forest Planning Alternatives—especially in the wolf recovery area in the Apache-Sitgreaves Forests— must include restoration of resilient ecosystems that restore natural processes, including native species, predation, and wildlife connectivity. 

Forests need top predators. The full-scale removal of wolves and fewer mountain lions have compromised the integrity of our wild lands. In Yellowstone National Park, reintroduced wolves keep elk moving and prevent excessive grazing in riparian areas and wetlands, allowing willows and cottonwoods to return to streambeds. This in turn, supports the return of beaver, fish, and birds. Wolves are critical to healthy ecosystems!!!!

Tell the Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest that the current range of alternatives is simply not acceptable.

1. The alternatives are skewed toward the maximum mechanical treatment/resource extraction/ motorized alternative that includes illegal declassifying of Inventoried Roadless Areas. This skewing imperils our Mexican gray wolves and is NOT acceptable.

2. Wolves need wilderness and large roadless areas. Include all of the 36 possible wilderness areas and wilderness additions.

3. Wolves need more protection because of the critical role they play in healthy forests; the plan needs to directly address changes that will help with the recovery of this species:
• Developing and enforcing a closed pasture calving and season,
• Reducing the number of livestock in areas of conflict with wolves,
• seasonal grazing only,
• Requiring grazing permittees to dispose of, or render unpalatable, all livestock carcasses before wolves are able to begin scavenging on them.
• Supporting and encouraging voluntary retirement of allotments.

Website: www.fs.fed.us/r3/asnf/plan-revision
E-mail: asnf.planning@fs.fed.us
Phone: (928) 333-4301        TTY: (928) 333-6292″

**Thank you to “Lobos of the Southwest” for providing this information!
http://www.mexicanwolves.org/index.php/news/153/51/Take-Action-by-April-30-Deadline

Read Full Post »


The US The Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) has decided to take no action in response to the state’s proposal to kill wolves in on Unimak Island, a unit of the Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge. Defenders of Wildlife supported the decision.

Neither the science nor the FWS’s policies could justify enacting the state’s proposal to kill wolves. The FWS has opted instead to devote further study into understanding the underlying causes of the Unimak caribou decline.The FWS’s measured approach is far more likely to produce a healthy ecosystem balance on Unimak Island in the long term, thereby benefiting subsistence hunters and all others who expect healthy wildlife populations on the national wildlife refuge. Killing wolves without understanding the cause of caribou decline ignores one of the primary purposes of this national wildlife refuge: conserving wildlife and habitats and their natural diversity.”

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (March 8, 2011) – The following is a statement from Defenders of Wildlife Alaska Representative Theresa Fiorino in response to the Fish and Wildlife Service’s decision:

“This is a good decision for Alaska. When wildlife management is guided by sound science, everybody wins in the long term.

“By taking this measured, comprehensive view, we are far more likely to solve long-term conservation challenges. Scientists know that meddling in the complex balance between predators and prey can actually exacerbate problems where they do exist, especially on island ecosystems like Unimak.

“Each time wolves are killed prematurely, before scientists can determine whether a decline in moose or caribou is part of a natural cycle, we deny ourselves the ability to truly understand the heart of the problem. Not only does this do a disservice to wildlife, but also to the Alaskans who rely on some wildlife for subsistence. Thankfully, this way forward should provide answers and, crucially, avoid creating new problems.”

**Special thanks to “wildlifewatch” and “Defenders of Wildlife” for providing this information.

Read Full Post »


Recently, the dark fantasy film  “Red Riding Hood” was released to the big screen.  The poster advertises, “Believe The Legend.  Beware The Wolf.”  

Will you see this film?  Why or why not?  Below, you will find a link to the film’s preview.  Wolf Preservation wants your feedback!

 http://trailers.apple.com/trailers/wb/redridinghood/

Read Full Post »


 Richard Cockle, The Oregonian from Oreganlive.com reports the following information:

“LA GRANDE — Shouldering signs proclaiming “Wolves are at Your Door!” and “Protect Our Children – No Wolves in Oregon,” about 60 protesters gathered today in front of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife offices.
Organizer Dale Potter  of Joseph led a delegation from Wallowa County that wants to prevent further population gains by gray wolves in Oregon. “The wolf is going to do away with big game hunting. It’s going to do away with the livestock industry,” Potter, a retired U.S. Air Force pilot, said as the demonstrators gathered.” 

While I can understand Dale Potter’s argument for avoiding livestock losses, there has to be a better way to co-exist with wolves instead of getting rid of all twenty wolves living there.  Why should wolves be hunted for purposes of boosting big game animals for sport?  To see the rest of the article, please click on the link below.    

http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2011/03/dozens_of_protesters_make_stand_in_la_grande_against_wolves.html

Read Full Post »


“You have a tremendous amount of backlash so that now you have self-appointed wolf experts misinforming the public and instilling fear that wolves are going to kill your kids, wipe out elk herds and spread diseases.”

Biologists have documented just a couple of dozen wolves that live in eastern Oregon. Nevertheless, the Legislature is considering four bills this session to control them. One state senator e-mailed his Klamath Falls constituents last week that these “vicious, imported predators” killed two pregnant cows outside Enterprise in “the most cruel way imaginable. These sadistic creatures,” wrote Sen. Doug Whitsett, R-Klamath Falls, need to be confronted. He introduced two of the bills “before we are forced to take up arms to protect our communities and our children.”

Cattlemen call them Canadian gray wolves who don’t belong here.

Suzanne Stone of Defenders of Wildlife counters such animosity, saying that three of the bills would upend the 2010 Oregon wolf plan, a broad compromise reached last fall between cattlemen, wool growers, hunters and conservationists on how to manage wolves until they are no longer listed as endangered. “The hardest part of wolf management,” she says, “is people.”

So it takes a big man who would stand between the two sides to explain the astonishing biology and sociology unleashed when wolves were returned to the American West. At 6-foot-6, Carter Niemeyer arrives in Portland just in time to elaborate.

Oregon and Washington were always outside the original reintroduction areas in the northern Rockies, but it was always understood wolves would cross state borders, and they have. As Oregon has become the latest battleground over wolves, Niemeyer emerges with a new and surprising book on how a wolf killer became key to their remarkable return.

The author of “Wolfer, A Memoir” is an unlikely guide, an Iowa farm boy who spent most of his career as the federal government’s hit man against predators. An expert trapper with degrees in wildlife biology, Niemeyer moved to Montana straight out of graduate school at Iowa State University in 1973. He worked as a state trapper and conducted wildlife studies for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service before joining an obscure little agency called Animal Damage Control.

Its mission was to kill. The targets: coyotes, foxes and black bears that preyed on the 3 million cows and three-quarters of a million sheep grazing on public and private land in Montana. It was “an entirely cultural and political activity that was such an integral part of the state it warranted its own branch of government,” he writes.

Few people knew such federal intervention existed. But until 1972, when poisoning predators was banned, the agency was placing 100,000 pounds of poisoned horse meat to kill coyotes and scattering poisoned grain to kill rodents. The poison was “spread over public and private lands to kill ground squirrels, prairie dogs, meadow mice, pocket gophers and porcupines.” So much poison, he wrote, that he could not imagine how any birds or other animals could survive.

“Even more unbelievable was the federal campaign against predators was going in every Western state, financed by taxpayers,” he writes.

Meticulous investigator

 
When Niemeyer joined Animal Damage Control in 1975, his job was to control predators — by trapping, shooting or aerial gunning. The first year alone, he captured more than 149 golden eagles to keep them from attacking lambs, relocating every one of them alive. He worked with trappers to dart and move grizzlies. Then in 1987, ranchers began seeing wolves crossing into Montana from Canada. As the number of sightings grew, a “wolf hysteria” soon followed, with reported kills of sheep and cattle.

As a scientist, Niemeyer wanted to figure out what had happened through forensic field investigations. Instead of parroting claims, he skinned carcasses, studied hemorrhages and examined tracks.

“All large predators have a way they kill,” he writes, “a signature.” The bear bites the top of the head, the wolf attacks from the rear, grabbing the flank, the easiest place to latch on.

He kept meticulous scientific notes, recording information and data, events and conversations. He soon became an expert on what predator took an animal down. The cause of death mattered immensely, as it would determine not only whether a wolf could be shot or trapped and relocated but also whether the Defenders of Wildlife would compensate the livestock owner. Between 1987 and 2009, the nonprofit paid livestock owners $1.4 million for their animals that wildlife authorities like Niemeyer deemed killed by wolves.

By 1990, he was a full-time wolf specialist, investigating and mitigating the wolf problem in Montana. He felt more like a sociologist, mediating between furious landowners and environmentalists, trying to determine whether wolves were responsible for livestock kills. Most of the time, the field investigation showed they were not.

“I felt people pushing me to simply rubber-stamp what they thought was happening and their entitlements,” he says.

His expertise soon took him to Canada on the first team to capture wolves to be reintroduced to Yellowstone National Park in 1995. He lectured widely, educating trappers, cattlemen and bureaucrats. And increasingly, he was forced to deal with wolf advocates, people “outside my comfort zone.”

“I started realizing there were two sides to this story and the decisions I made had huge ramifications. That gave me the conviction I needed to be more honest, more fair, to dig deeper into why we are doing these things and for what reason,” he said in an interview from his Boise home.

“That is where I started to change.”

He began to look at predator control, at killing of animals, in a different light. But stepping onto middle ground eventually made him a pariah in Animal Damage Control, by then renamed Wildlife Services.

Beyond the Big Bad Wolf

In 2000, he left that agency for an even more contentious position overseeing wolf recovery in Idaho for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. He retired in 2006, then spent the next five summers putting radio collars on wolves for the Idaho Department of Fish and Game. Today, there are nearly 800 wolves in Idaho and 400 in Montana. In his career, Niemeyer trapped or helicopter-captured more than 300.

For years, people urged him to write his story, a Rooster Cogburn meets Forrest Gump adventure on wolf recovery, with plenty of shooting and skinning. He finally did write the book, spurred on by his wife, and editor, Jenny Long Niemeyer. Dee Lane, political editor at The Oregonian, also contributed to the editing.

But the people he wrote the book for — ranchers, sportsmen and outdoorsmen who love the wild places he does — likely won’t read it, he says.

The wolf issue has become the infuriating symbol of federal intervention in the rural West, leaving many people distrusting or discounting those who have the most scientific knowledge of the subject.

“You have a tremendous amount of backlash so that now you have self-appointed wolf experts misinforming the public and instilling fear that wolves are going to kill your kids, wipe out elk herds and spread diseases.”

None of that is true, he says. Still, he keeps calling for common ground, urging agencies to co-investigate suspected wolf kills, with transparency and oversight. He wants more conversations with ranchers and encourages more nonlethal controls. And he hopes people learn more than the “Little Red Riding Hood” storyline of the Big Bad Wolf.

Last weekend, he took high school kids 90 minutes north of Boise to find wolf tracks in the snow and hear their howling. Tuesday, he’ll speak at the Audubon Society of Portland on the long journey to recovery that wolves in Oregon face. He often thinks it will take the younger generation to appreciate what has been accomplished.

“Wolves are in great shape in the northern Rockies,” he says. “They’re prolific and resilient, and with fair chase-hunting season and regulations, wolves are here to stay.”
 
Julie Sullivan

*Special thanks to Julie Sullivan from “OregonLive.com” for providing the information in this article.

http://www.oregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2011/03/former_wolf_hit_man_carter_nie.html

Read Full Post »


“Wolf Warriors” on Facebook recently spoke with Republican Ken Miller about wolves.  Here is what happened  “KILLEM ALL” “That was the answer to the first question I asked Republican Gubernatorial candidate Ken Miller. I asked him why he felt this way. He reply was “because wolves are taking away his traditions and heritage”. He told me the “w…olves are killing all the deer and elk”. He then turned his back towards me and started to walk away. In a voice he could hear I explained that we have 18 percent more elk now in Montana then when wolves were reintroduced into Yellow in 1995. He yelled to me that my information was incorrect. I told him that these statistics came from Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks. Dont you believe they are capable and accurate. Silence was the response.”

This is exactly why we do not need politicians deciding the fate of wolves or ANYONE with this mentality.  Please visit Ken Miller through this link and tell him what you feel about his comments about wolves!

http://miller4governor.com/contact/

Read Full Post »


Robert Goldman is a devoted wolf advocate and currently resides in Maine. Bob has lived and worked in Yellowstone, the Sierras, Alaska and other special places, and lives for the day when more wilderness and all wildlife is respected and protected. He urges all those interested in learning more about wolves to read Barry Lopez’s Of Wolves and Men and to watch the DVD Lords of Nature by Green Fire Productions. Visit Bob’s new website coming this Winter: www.FriendsOfTheWolves.org.

Here is a few comments from his article about how effective non-lethal control techniques in Minnesota are:

“With help from their state’s wildlife agency and from wildlife advocates, they have willingly adopted non-lethal, wolf and predator friendly control techniques that very, very effectively protect their cattle and sheep. Western cattle ranchers and farmers can learn from the good folks of Minnesota. And those of us who love America’s wolves and wildlife can make sure they do.”

“Ecologist and teacher Aldo Leopold stopped killing wolves and began defending their vital place in nature, when he himself learned through patience and study, about nature and ecology. We can all do that today, the information is there and very accessible. Get a copy of Green Fire Productions’ Lords of Nature DVD. Watch and listen to the wolf-wise ranchers, farmers and hunters of Minnesota. They have learned to live in harmony and respectfully, with the 3,500 wolves roaming free and just being wolves, in their wonderful state.”

Follow the link below for the rest of his article.  Thank you to Robert Goldman for providing the information in this post!

http://maine.earth-first.net/2011/01/getting-it-right-for-wolves-for-the-earth-by-robert-goldman/

Read Full Post »


Michael Brune, Sierra Club Executive Director, discusses how certain bills could be disastrous to wolves.  Right now, removing wolves from the Endangered Species List could drive Mexican Gray wolves to extinction, which accounts for about forty two members.  You can send a message to your congressional representatives today!  Check out his short article through the link below.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/mbrune/detail?entry_id=83771

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »