Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Wolf Current Events’ Category


The Endangered Species Act is under attack and wolves will pay dearly if they are not protected!

“Wolf Warriors” on Facebook has prepared a pre-written letter for wolf advocates everywhere to copy and paste.  I have included it below.  A huge thank you to “Wolf Warriors” so please make sure to show them your appreciation!  You can post the letter on the web link provided at the bottom:

  Dear Senator —

As an wildlife conservation advocate, I am deeply disturbed by Section 1713 (p. 266) of the House’s Continuing Resolution – 2011 which was passed on Feb. 19, 2011. This section states, “Before the end of the 60-day period b…eginning on the date of enactment of this division, the Secretary of the Interior shall reissue the final rule published on April 2, 2009 (74 Fed. Reg. 15123 et seq.) without regard to any other provision of statute or regulation that applies to issuance of such rule. Such reissuance (including this section) shall not be subject to judicial review.”

Please be advised that I vehemently oppose this section of the House’s version of the Appropriations bill. Buried deep within the text of the bill, it covertly voids US District Judge Donald Molloy’s ruling that re-listed wolves on the Endangered Species List as of August, 2010. In addition, Sec. 1713 seemingly precludes any judicial review of decisions which may result in de-listing the gray wolf from the Endangered Species List in the future.

It’s not the role of Congress to decide which species should or should not receive protection from the ESA. The ESA is one of our most respected environmental laws. Its power lies in the independent, scientific consultation at its heart. In fact, Congress has never successfully legislated a species-specific decision under the ESA. Wolves should not be the first. That is a decision that should be made by independent science. The ESA, and issues related to wolf restoration, requires clear thinking, strategic planning and science-based decision-making. To legislate such a decision would weaken the Act and set a dangerous precedent that could lead to more native fish, wildlife, and plants being wrongly stripped of protection.

Respectfully submitted,

http://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2011/02/11/2011-3064/nonessential-experimental-populations-of-gray-wolves-in-the-northern-rocky-mountains-lethal-take-of

Read Full Post »


 

“BILLINGS, Mont. – Defying federal authority over gray wolves, Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer on Wednesday encouraged ranchers to kill wolves that prey on their livestock — even in areas where that is not currently allowed — and said the state will start shooting packs that hurt elk herds.

Schweitzer told The Associated Press he no longer would wait for federal officials to resolve the tangle of lawsuits over wolves, which has kept the animals on the endangered species list for a decade since recovery goals were first met.

“We will take action in Montana on our own,” he said. “We’ve had it with Washington, D.C., with Congress just yipping about it, with (the Department of) Interior just vacillating about it.”

State wildlife agents and ranchers already kill wolves regularly across much of the Northern Rockies, where 1,700 of the animals roam parts of five states. Rules against killing wolves have been relaxed significantly by federal officials over the past decade but hunting remains prohibited.

Livestock owners in southern Montana and Idaho have authority to defend their property by shooting wolves that attack their cattle, sheep or other domestic animals. And federal agents regularly kill problem wolves, with more than 1,000 shot over the past decade.

But Schweitzer is moving to expand those killings beyond what the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has so far allowed, including to parts of Montana where ranchers are not allowed to shoot the predators.

Fish and Wildlife spokesman Chris Tollefson said the agency was working with Montana and other states in the region to address their concerns over the wolf population.

“We’ve been in negotiations with Montana and the other states for some time, and we’re committed to continuing that and trying to find a solution that works for everybody,” he said.

In a letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar provided by Schweitzer’s office, the Democratic governor said state game wardens will be directed to stop investigating wolf shootings north of Interstate 90, the part of the state with the strictest protections for the animals.

That follows a similar show of defiance from Idaho’s Republican governor, C.L. “Butch” Otter.

Otter said in the fall that Idaho Fish and Game agents would no longer participate in wolf management efforts, including shooting investigations. The move forced federal officials to step in to enforce restrictions on killing the animals.

Federal enforcement of laws against killing protected wolves also would be expected in Montana.

But critics of federal wolf policies appeared emboldened by the governor’s Wednesday statements. Robert Fanning, who heads a group that advocates protecting elk herds around Yellowstone National Park from wolves, sent out an e-mail urging Montana residents to “lock and load and saddle up while there is still snow on the ground.”

In the Bitterroot Valley south of Missoula, Schweitzer directed Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks to begin removing wolf packs blamed for driving down elk populations.

The state has a pending petition before the Fish and Wildlife Service to remove a dozen wolves in the Bitterroot. A decision on that petition is pending, according to federal officials.

But Schweitzer indicated Wednesday he was not going to wait, and would leave it to state wildlife agents to decide when to kill the wolves. He was less adamant in the letter to Salazar, which said the Bitterroot packs would be killed “to the extent allowed by the Endangered Species Act.”

Department of Interior spokeswoman Kendra Barkoff said the agency agreed there was an “urgent need” to turn over wolf management to states that have acceptable management plans for the animals.

“But the governor’s letter is not the answer,” she added.

Federal wildlife officials have tried twice in the last four years to lift endangered protections for wolves and turn over management to the states. Both attempts were reversed in federal court.

A provision in a budget bill pending before Congress would revoke endangered species status for wolves in Montana and Idaho. Other measures introduced by lawmakers would lift federal protections across the lower 48 states.

Despite the bitter public divide on the issue, attacks on livestock by other, unprotected predators such as coyotes far exceed damage from wolves, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture statistics. But the lack of state control over wolves because of their endangered status has frustrated both livestock owners and elk hunters, who complain that their hands are tied by federal protections.

“This is a real-life problem in Montana — and we plan to start solving the problem,” Schweitzer said.”

*Thank you to Matthew Brown, Associated Press for providing this information.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_endangered_wolves_montana

Read Full Post »


Grazing on public lands, which appears to be a privilege,  has caused a lot of damage to wolves.  It is illegal to kill wolves in many areas, yet people who shoot them are rarely prosecuted.  The killing of one wolf can be devistating to the rest of the wolf pack.  The recovery areas must be expanded for increased chance of survival.  Co-existence efforts between people and wolves must also be the primary focus.   Direct releases of the Mexican Grey Wolf need to be allowed.  Lobos of the Southwest states, “WildEarth Guardians’ Executive Director, John Horning recently participated in a public television special about the critically endangered Mexican gray wolf that also included statements by Caren Cowan.

Cowan represented the New Mexico Cattlegrowers’ Association.

Horning does a great job presenting the need for a new lobo recovery plan, the reintroduction of more wolves, and grazing permit retirement with willing public lands ranchers.”  Check out the debate through the link below!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmPhyXem0E4

Read Full Post »


A recent mystery transpires in Gatchel, Indiana when a homeowner’s pet dog survives a vicious attack by what appears to be a wolf. The only flaw to this unfortunate scenario…Indiana wolves were eradicated over 100 years ago.   

YouTube houses the Channel 14 story and can be seen at the following link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRGDvPVaTIc(Warning: there are a few graphic pictures).

As seen from the video link, a number of wolf hybrids bonded together and likely escaped from their owners. Wolf hybrids are a mix of a wolf and a dog and are very uncommon because almost all of them are bred by humans. Despite common perception, breeding these two genetically similar animals does not usually produce a docile, loving best friend. In fact, mixing the two species can cause a normally tame dog persona to fight with an instinctually marauder persona.

Dr. Randall Lockwood, ASPCA’s Senior Vice President for forensic sciences weighs in on the subject, “I have bred several myself in my research and worked with them.  People who seek out wolf hybrids often do it for selfish and egotistical reasons.  They want something exotic.  It’s a mistaken belief that somehow they are honoring the spirit of the wild.  Yet they have produced an animal that cannot usually live safely or happily with humans.  It can’t live as a wild animal, nor does it have the adaptation of a dog.  Wolf-dog hybrids are not necessarily more aggressive, but they are often very easily frightened and aroused.  They’re escape artists—virtually almost every one I have ever known has escaped.  They can be predatory.  They are not suited to the wild world of companion animals.  They are difficult to train.  Wolves have enormous control over their aggression—wolves rarely fight other wolves.  But when you breed wolves with dogs, it’s potentially a very dangerous combination.” 

It’s interesting to note that Lockwood also added that on average, there has been one hybrid-caused fatality a year over the last twenty years in the United States.  By comparison, Merritt Clifton, editor of Animal People News claimed that there were 345 people killed by dogs between 1982 and 2009; 159 of these fatalities were actually caused by the infamous pit bull terrier or a similar mix.

Unfortunately, given the wolf’s notorious history, the rare occurrence of a bite or fatality inflicted wound by a wolf-hybrid would most likely reinforce its deleterious reputation. The perception of the wolf has long been misunderstood. A predator by birth, one of the most common misconceptions is that a wolf lives to eat…anything. This couldn’t be further from the truth. A wolf, as stated before being a predatory animal, is far more likely to stalk prey that it perceives as a challenge rather than prey it perceives as “available.” This does not preclude that wolf related incidents don’t occur. If an animal (or person) is hungry enough its instincts will kick in and it will find a way to feed itself. This is one of the many reasons breeding a wolf and a dog can be a huge mistake. The wolf’s predatory nature will conflict with a domestic canine personality.

Although ownership of a wolf hybrid is a decision not to be taken lightly, uninformed people taking on this difficult responsibility should keep a few critical ideas in mind:  provide extraordinary amounts of space, time, security, and avoid the use of cages.  Spend extra time researching the needs of wolf hybrids and consult with an expert on the subject.  You can start by visiting the following link through “Wolf Park,” a non-profit research and education center dedicated to behavioral research on wolves:  (http://www.wolfpark.org/wolfhybridposition.shtml).  Dr. Erich Klinghammer, Director of Wolf Park explained some insightful knowledge on the livelihood of owning such a majestic animal, “The way such animals are often kept does not usually meet the social and behavioral needs of the animals. They frequently languish in small cages, or are tied to chains, with no quality of life to speak of.  We are concerned that pet wolves and hybrids improperly kept, when they do cause damage negatively affect the image of the wolf in the wild. Hence, we all should do what we can to prevent this by practicing and promoting responsible ownership.” 

Wolf organizations have devoted their talents and efforts to rescue wolf hybrids that would otherwise be put to death.  Many of these steadfast organizations can likely attest that wolf hybrids have gotten more negative attention than they deserve and act appropriately in accordance with the amount of expertise and effort owners contribute. 

Continue reading on Examiner.com: Hybrids Mistaken For Wolves -Michael Heath Indianapolis Wildlife Advocacy| Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/wildlife-advocacy-in-indianapolis/hybrids-mistaken-for-wolves#ixzz1Cf0CHO4K

Read Full Post »


In their darkest days, only five Mexican gray wolves—including just one female—could be found in the wild. Professional biologists at the nation’s leading zoos and other wildlife facilities helped pull Mexican gray wolves back from the brink of extinction by creating a captive breeding program which now involves 51 facilities across the United States and Mexico.

“Lobos of The Southwest” are working to help ensure the survival of the Mexican gray wolf.  Please visit their website provided below.

http://www.mexicanwolves.org/index.php/captive-breeding

Read Full Post »


What began as an early-morning deer hunt turned into an unnerving encounter with three timber wolves, a Saskatchewan farmer says.

Late last month, Gord Cadrain ventured east from his farm near Glaslyn, 68 kilometres north of North Battleford.

Cadrain said he was lying in snow-covered brush, scanning for deer through the scope of his gun, when he spotted a yellow eye.

“‘What the heck was that?'” he recalled thinking. “‘Was that a coyote, or a wolf or what?'”

It was, in fact, a timber wolf and it appeared to be stalking Cadrain, he said.

He shot and wounded the animal, then followed the trail of blood down a coulee to make sure the wolf was dead.

‘These wolves, there was no fear in their eyes.’—Gord Cadrain, farmer

At a point where the trail ended, he ran into his second wolf.

“I look over to the right and here comes another one. A great big white bugger, and he’s coming straight for me,” Cadrain said.

Cadrain shot that wolf and another soon after. 

“These wolves, there was no fear in their eyes,” he said. “They were in the hunting mode. They just basically [mistook] me for a deer.”

With only one round left, Cadrain quickly headed home. If there were more wolves, he would have been in big trouble, he said. They were all large, healthy-looking animals.

“It would have been one heck of a fight,” he said. “If you think you were going to beat them off with a stick … you’d be looking for a pretty big stick.”

He made it home without any further incident. Although wolves are by nature shy creatures, Cadrain said, he will now avoid that area.

“I have no fear of timber wolves,” he said. “It was just one of those oddball things.”

Although reports of wolf attacks are rare, there have been a number of sightings of the animals this year in La Ronge and other northern communities.

No one has been hurt.

Read Full Post »


MADRID – MANY currently struggle to keep the figurative wolf from the door but in the Guadarrama mountains (Madrid), cattle farmers are striving to keep Iberian wolves from their herds and flocks. Videos and sound recordings had been sent to the regional president, Esperanza Aguirre, to prove that wolves were in the area and attacked livestock, said a representative from the Farming, Stockbreeding and Forestry Union (UGEMA).

The Madrid regional government’s environment department conceded that wolves were around but insisted that they did not inhabit the area but crossed the boundaries separating Madrid from Avila and Segovia.

Cattle farmers and the regional government are now attempting to put guidelines in place for payouts in compensation for attacks from the wolves, which are a protected species unique to Spain.

As already happens in the neighbouring region of Castilla y Leon, breeders and farmers could find themselves having to insure animals to demonstrate that they, too, were prepared to shoulder some of the responsibility.

“But it should not require much effort on the part of the Madrid regional government to compensate affected farmers for the damage inflicted by wildlife, including wolves,” argued UGEMA.

Local forest rangers confirmed the presence of wolves in Guadarrama and agreed that legislation was required without delay to ensure that the cattle farmers did not suffer financially.

“Compensation payments would protect the wolves from illegal deterrents like traps or poison and these iconic animals could remain safely in the province,” said one ranger.

Meanwhile, affected farmers and breeders should increase safety measures by putting up fences and enclosing herds and flocks at night, said experts, who also recommended a return to traditional mastiffs as guard dogs.

http://www.euroweeklynews.com/2011010385287/news/spain/wolves-at-large-in-madrid-mountains.html

Read Full Post »


In March of 2010, just outside of Chignik Lake, Alaska, a 32 year old schoolteacher was killed by an unknown wild animal while jogging just a mile away from her own home. The consensus among state troopers, news articles, and local villagers was that there was a 99% chance that a wolf or wolves had been the culprits of this unforeseen attack.  The schoolteacher, Candice Berner, had been dragged a small distance from where the attack occurred and paw prints, presumably wolf, had been found around her body. In addition, however, a few snowmobilers spotted human footprints in the vicinity where Berner had been attacked.  Autopsy results concluded only that her body had been assaulted by animals, but could not determine whether this occurred prior to death or not.  

Certainly there are factors that could give weight to the theory that the attack was indeed initiated by one or more wolves. There were paw prints found at the scene of the attack which appeared to be in the shape of wolf prints; witnesses stated that the only wild animal seen in the days prior to Berner’s death were wolves; and Berner had been running prior to her attack and wolves are known to have an instinctual nature to chase their prey.

While the facts listed above are truthful in nature, there are other factors not considered that might suggest that a wolf did not attack Berner.  Historically wolves do not attack humans for the simple reason that humans are higher up on the food chain and tend to pose the larger threat to the wolf. There are arguments that wolves find the taste of human flesh less appealing because it is not part of their routine diet. When a wolf attacks animal prey, it cannot finish the entire carcass and tends to leave portions of the body to the wilderness. When the wolf does leave however, it is followed quickly by other carnivorous opportunists who quickly dive in to clean up what the wolf has left behind. Berner’s body showed animal assault wounds, but the coroner could not determine if animals were the cause of death.

Giving the state troopers and eye witnesses the benefit of the doubt, there are compelling factors as to why this could have been a wolf attack, however it is imperative to note that even if a wolf is the cause, the attack is absolutely and undeniably a rare occurrence in the United States.

To call a spade a spade, humans have imposed on nature’s habitat for years and prolonged exposure of wolves to humans over time has increased the likelihood of an incident. Berner could have been more of a target because she was small in stature. To the wolf, Berner would have appeared vulnerable and weak because of her size and because she was alone. As if that were not enough to entice the wolf, she would have appeared to be offering them a chance to chase their prey.   Wolves experience a higher likelihood of failure in catching prey if they are larger, healthy, and standing their ground face to face. The wolf’s success rate in catching food is extremely low and increased hunger can lead to desperation and deviation from normal eating patterns. If any wolves involved were younger, less experienced, and unable to find plentiful, easy prey, Berner may have been in the wrong place at the wrong time and unaware of her surroundings.   

While there will likely never be any definitive proof to explain what really happened to Candice Berner that day, it is a safe bet that while humankind continues to tread with little or no care into the wilderness it will be met with animosity and defensiveness. The moral to this tale is to be cognizant and respectful of the beauty the wilderness holds and humans will find that cohabitation is possible.

**Please follow additional articles by myself, Indianapolis Wildlife Advocacy Examiner at http://www.examiner.com/wildlife-advocacy-in-indianapolis/michael-heath

Read Full Post »


What you can do if you oppose Utah state senator Allen Christensen wolf killing bill?

Wolves urgently need your help. Please send the following alert to as many people as you can. Use your organization’s email list if you can! Do it right away, then act on it yourself! The organization Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife has a bill before the Utah legislature that would require the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources to prevent wolf packs from becoming established in the Utah portion of the Rocky Mountain gray wolf recovery area. This part of the recovery area is where dispersing wolves from the Yellowstone country have been entering Utah, some of them traveling on to Colorado. If this bill passes, any wolves entering Utah in this area will be subject to capture and return or death. This egregious bill, identified as S.B. 36 first substitute, would supplant the Utah Wolf Management Plan – a plan which would at least tolerate up to two breeding pairs producing at least two surviving offspring for two consecutive years. I know, this plan is really lame, but it is better than what the bill would require. Furthermore, it was created through a public process that began with and ended with the Utah legislature – a process that involved 13 representatives of a diverse group of stakeholders, including ranchers and sportsmen, working for a year and a half. Even then, the ranching and hunting interests on the working group violated the mutually agreed-upon protocols in order to ensure that the resulting plan is really weak. Not satisfied with that, now they want to lord over the rest of us to ensure that there are never any wild wolves in Utah. At bottom this is a moral issue: We must stand up for wolves and wild nature and for ourselves. Here’s what you can do, but please do it quickly as this bill is on a fast track – do it NOW if you can: If you are a Utah resident, go to the following web-site and click on ‘Senate’ and ‘House’ to find your senator and your representative, then contact each and let him or her know in no ambiguous terms that you want this bill to fail. This will be particularly important for those of you who live in the Republican-dominated rural parts of the state: http://www.le.state.ut.us/ If you live outside Utah and you want to exert influence on this, you might contact the Utah Office of Tourism and express your displeasure over this bill and tell them that, if it passes, it will make you less interested in vacationing and recreating in Utah: http://travel.utah.gov/contactus.html If you would like to be added to the Utah Wolf Forum list serve to receive periodic updates on this and other wolf-related issues, contact lynx@xmission.com and state your request. It is our policy that you also briefly state your reason.

Sincerely, Kirk Robinson, PhD, Director of Western Wildlife Conservancy Allison Jones, M.S., Conservation biologist with Wild Utah Project

*Thanks to “Howling for Justice” for providing this information. (http://howlingforjustice.wordpress.com/2010/01/29/utah-senator-to-wolves-do-not-enter-utah-on-pain-of-death-alert-take-action/)

Read Full Post »


Thanks to Marc Cooke, Wildlife Advocate, for providing this information. 

Northern Idaho Wolf Alliance (NIWA)
December 5, 2010

SOME REPRESENTATIVES HAVE JOINED THE ATTACK ON WOLVES AND THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT

Pardon us for a seeming redundancy, but a bill, HR 6028, has been introduced in the House of Representatives to delist wolves from the Endangered Species List (ESL). This is companion legislation to the Senate bill (S. 3864) we wrote to you about a few days ago. If anything, it is worse than the Senate version because it delists ALL wolves, including the remnant 47 Mexican wolves in the Southwest.

A few days ago, Interior Salazar Secretary assured 3 western governors that the Obama administration would help get the bills passed in the next two weeks.

This bill would circumvent the Endangered Species Act (ESA), & remove wolves from its protection.

It would set a dangerous precedent, by, for the first time, removing an animal from the ESL for political, not scientific reasons. No animal that hunters, ranchers and anti-wildlife forces dislike would ever be safe again.

The immediate consequences would be wolf-hunting seasons in Idaho, Montana, & Wyoming, as well as wolf exterminations by the US Wildlife Service. Almost half of the wolves recently brought back from extinction would be killed, thus reducing them to a remnant, token population, unable to fulfill their biological role in our forests and subjecting them to their possible second extinction.

We are asking you to take 3 actions:
       1. Contact pro-environmental Congressmen on the House Committee on Natural Resources, listed below, and ask them to oppose this legislation.

    2. Forward it to people who care about wolves.

    3. Network with local pro-wildlife organizations & ask them to get on board in this effort (big ones like Defenders of Wildlife, NRDC, etc are already working on it)

Here are important talking points:
ï Rather than decimating livestock, wolves are responsible for less than 1% of depredation.
ï Rather than reducing elk populations, elk numbers have increased since wolf re-introduction to over one million in the Northern Rockies.
ï Scientific studies show that wolves have positive effects on forest health.
ï This bill would set a dangerous precedent, subjecting other species in the future to political rather than scientific scrutiny to delist them.

Thank you for your efforts. Together, we can successfully defend the wolves.

        Nancy Taylor, Co-Chair
        Ann Sydow, Co-Chair  & Newsletter Editor
        Ken Fischman, Vice-Chair
       

You can: (1) Call, (2) FAX, or (3) click on the Representativesí email

Committee on Natural Resources:

Rahall, Nick – (D – WV), Chair
(304) 522 6425 Huntington office
(304) 529 5716 fax
eMail – http://www.rahall.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=91&sectiontree=91
 
Hinchey, Maurice – (D – NY)
(845) 331 4466 Kingston office
(202) 226 0774 fax
 
DeFazio, Peter – (D – OR)
(541) 465 6732 Eugene office
(541) 465 6458 fax
eMail – https://forms.house.gov/defazio/IMA/contact.html
 
Grijalva, Raul M. – (D – AZ)
(520) 622 6788 Tucson office
(520) 622 0198 fax
eMail – http://grijalva.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=49&sectiontree=2,49
 
Miller, George – (D- CA)
(925) 602 1880 Concord office
(925) 674 0983 fax
eMail – https://georgemiller.house.gov/contact/email-me.shtml
 
 
 
Committee on Natural Resources, Sub-Committee on Insular Affairs, Oceans and Wildlife
 
Bordallo, Madeleine Z. (D – Guam), Chair
(202) 225 1188 Washington, D.C. office
(202) 226 0341 fax
eMail – http://www.house.gov/bordallo/contact.shtml

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »