Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Wolf Current Events’ Category


Wolf Geographic

“ANCHORAGE,  Alaska (AP) — A second interior Alaska wolf has tested positive for rabies, the  Alaska  Department of Fish and Game announced Thursday.

A  trapper captured the wolf March 15 near Chandalar Lake near the foothills of the  Brooks range about 185 miles north of Fairbanks, the same general location as a  rabid wolf shot last month. The trapper killed the wolf, skinned it and fed raw  meat from the carcass to his dog team, said spokeswoman Cathie  Harms. The five dogs are in quarantine in Fairbanks.

The  dogs had been vaccinated for rabies but will be given booster shots, the  department said.

Rabies,  according to the Centers  for Disease Control and Prevention, is a viral disease that can infect  mammals, including humans. It’s usually transmitted through bites but can also  spread by coming into contact with infected nerve tissue such as brains or  spinal cords.

The  rabies virus infects the central nervous system and can cause death, according  to the CDC.

Rabies  is regularly detected in Arctic foxes along Alaska’s west and north coasts but  had not been found south of the Brooks Range since statehood in 1959, the  department said.

“We’re  still trying to get a clearer picture of the current situation, especially in  wolves in the Chandalar Lake area,” Dr. Kimberlee Beckmen, a department  veterinarian, said in the announcement. “We’d really like to hear from the  people who have seen wolves or other wildlife acting abnormally in that area.  Abnormal behavior can also be caused by diseases other than rabies, such as  distemper, so a test of brain tissue is required for a definitive diagnosis of  the disease.”

Both  rabid wolves exhibited abnormal behavior when they were killed.

Wolves  normally are shy, but a trapper who shot the wolf last month said the animal had  closely approached him.

The  trapper, a man who lives near Palmer, took the animal home with him and cut  himself while skinning it. Worried that the animal may have been infected, he  sent the head in for testing and discarded the rest of the carcass in a  wooded area.

When  the department confirmed rabies, which can be spread to other animals that eat  nerve tissue such as brains or spinal cords, the carcass was retrieved. The  carcass had been scavenged, but the spinal cord had not been disturbed,  officials said.

The  wolf caught in a leg trap March 15 was alive when the trapper approached but  appeared dull and unaware, the department said.

The  trapper killed the animal, skinned it and fed the raw meat to his dogs.

Beckman  said they should not have been fed the carcass.

“It’s  very dangerous to feed raw carcasses of wildlife, especially carnivores, to  pets,” Beckmen said. “Pets can not only become infected, they can then transmit  diseases and parasites to their owners, rabies, tularemia and echinococcus being  the most serious.”

Echinococcus  is a bacterial infection, Harms said.

Rabies  had not been diagnosed in the region in 54 years of statehood, but archived  territorial reports document cases of rabies in fox and dogs in interior Alaska,  the department said.

Beckmen  said she’s looking for more samples from the heads of wolves, wolverines, foxes  or coyotes killed near the Chandalar Lakes or Fortymile River areas.

Rabies  has been detected over the winter along the north and west coasts and more cases  are expected in the arctic fox and red fox populations. Village dogs, the  department said, are vulnerable to infection from foxes.

Alaska  health officials warn trappers and hunters to wear gloves when skinning animals,  wash wounds with soap and water, wash knives after cutting off heads and avoid  cutting into brains or spinal cords.”

Special thanks to DAN JOLING, Associated Press, for providing the information in this post! 

 

Read Full Post »


wolf down

Takepart.com – Tue, Apr 23, 2013

“Of the top reasons tourists travel thousands of miles for a 12-hour round-trip bus ride into Denali National Park, wolves rank right up there with grizzly bears and the sight of 20,320-foot Mount McKinley on a rare bluebird day. To the few who know, members of Denali’s wolf population are also some of the longest, continuously studied animal groups in the world, besting even Jane Goodall’s chimps. But in recent years, wolf numbers in the 7,370-square-mile park have decreased even faster than the TV audience of Sarah Palin’s Alaska on TLC. In 2007, Denali Park biologists counted 147 wolves in nine groups that roamed the 93-year-old park. But in their most recent count, taken last autumn, numbers had declined to 54, the lowest since 1986.

Some, like the Alaska Board of Game, blame this die-off on natural causes—wolves killing wolves and low sheep populations. But others, including private citizens, park biologists, and members of the environmental advocacy group the Alaska Wildife Alliance (AWA), believe there are more sinister reasons. According to some AWA members, the recent, radical decline of the park’s most visible wolves—called the Grant Creek group—is the result of three main factors: the dissolution of Denali’s protective buffer zone, the Palin-appointed Alaska Board of Game, and the acute, ethically questionable actions of a small handful of local trappers, including a man named Coke Wallace.

 We’ll start with the protective buffer zone. Between 1966 and 2009, celebrated wolf biologist Gorden Haber studied wolves, on the ground, in Denali, hundreds of hours each year. During his extensive observation, Haber witnessed wolves wandering just outside the park and trappers laying their snares along the park’s boundary to kill these wolves. Thanks to his studies, Haber was able, in 2000, to convince the then-Board of Game to establish a protective buffer along the outside edge of the park, within a finger of state land, where wolf trapping was otherwise legal. Tragically, Haber died in a plane crash while observing wolves in late 2009. And the following March, the Board of Game rescinded the protective area.

Trappers once again position their snares along the park boundary, killing not only adult wolves, but pups. And last May, in an act that infuriated both wolf advocates and the usually detached Denali Park Service, the local trapper, Coke Wallace, hitched a dead horse to his four-wheeler, dragged it to the park boundary, and used it to lure and snare the pregnant alpha female of the park’s wolf group, Grant Creek.

AWA member Marybeth Holleman studied these ongoing events as she wrote her forthcoming book, Among Wolves, a profile of the late biologist Gordon Haber. She says that Denali Park biologist Tom Meier (also recently deceased) reported that he and other park biologists believed declining wolf populations weren’t the result of declining prey. Nor did they blame habitat, which is abundant in the 6.3 million-acre park. That, Meier said, left two causes: trapping on park borders and the vigorous predator-control program against bears and wolves currently under way in areas adjacent to the park. “What Tom told me is that when game officials do intensive predator control, it creates a vacuum,” says Holleman. “He believed that Denali wolves may have expanded their territory to fill it.”

Holleman, along with several wolf advocacy groups, have petitioned the Board of Game to “reinstate the protective buffer.” But in about six attempts, between 2010 and present, the Board refused and created a potentially illegal eight-year “moratorium” on even discussing the buffer zone. At its January meeting, the Board also discussed the petition “behind closed doors,” possibly violating the Alaska Open Meetings Act. The AWA has filed a lawsuit contesting the Board’s conduct with that meeting, results withstanding.

Another petition to reinstate the buffer will be discussed at the next meeting of the Board of Game, this May.”

*Special thanks to http://news.yahoo.com/secret-reasons-wolves-dying-denali-212011543.html?bcmt=1366763539830-6fe0d306-033a-4655-b7a9-42b6a9d169c4_00002s000000000000000000000000-82acbcc7-8567-4b35-ad73-3b7c4a4277d6&bcmt_s=e#mediacommentsugc_container, for providing this information!

Read Full Post »


Gray Wolf Pup

“ALBUQUERQUE, N.M.—Officials confirmed Wednesday that an animal killed by a federal employee in southwestern New Mexico in January was a Mexican gray wolf.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said genetic tests confirmed it was a small, uncollared female. More tests are under way to determine which pack the wolf was associated with.

In January, an employee with the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Wildlife Services shot what officials described at the time as a “canine.” The employee reported the shooting because the animal looked like a Mexican wolf after closer inspection.

The wolf was shot from about 250 yards away, officials said.

“Our specialist, at the time, was upset and that’s why he reported it. Still, we’re disappointed that it occurred,” said Carol Bannerman, a spokeswoman at Wildlife Services headquarters.

The Mexican gray wolf was added to the federal endangered species list in 1976. The effort to reintroduce the wolves in New Mexico and Arizona has stumbled due to legal battles, illegal shootings and other problems.

Federal officials have been tightlipped about the January shooting. They have not said what prompted the employee to shoot but implied that he may have thought it was a coyote. The employee was in the Mangas area investigating cattle deaths when the shooting occurred.

Bannerman said the employee remains on the job and the agency is cooperating with the Fish and Wildlife Service.  The case been turned over to the U.S. attorney’s office for review.”

*Special thanks to The Associated Press, http://www.ruidosonews.com/ci_23098618/feds-confirm-employee-killed-mexican-gray-wolf for providing this information!

Read Full Post »


Gray Wolf Pup

“GRAND RAPIDS, MI — Does a proposed law working through the state Senate put Michigan wolves in danger?

A number of letter writers say the public should have a direct say in protecting wildlife from hunters, and stand in opposition to a bill co-sponsored by Grand Rapids-area state Sens. David Hildenbrand, R-Lowell, and Arlan Meekhof, R-West Olive.

Pat Hartsoe attended a recent hearing in Lansing:

Last week I attended the Senate Committee on Natural Resources, Environment and Great Lakes. I came away feeling marginalized by the thinly-veiled political process I witnessed. Senate Bill 288 (co-sponsored by State Sen. Dave Hildenbrand, R-Lowell) was discussed.

SB 288 would allow the Natural Resources Commission to designate animals as “game species.” This bill was quickly introduced April 9, shortly after 250,000 registered voter signatures were delivered to the Secretary of State office in Lansing. I helped collect those signatures during bitter winter weather. The petition would require a public vote in 2014 on wolf hunting.
One problem with SB 288 is that if the NRC designates an animal a game species, concerned citizens would not be able to reverse this decision with a ballot referendum as they could with legislative decisions. Further, the NRC is an appointed, not elected, group.

Only one member has a science background. Two nationally-recognized scientists from Michigan’s Upper Peninsula with 30 years of wolf research experience were never consulted. After hearing public input, a 5 to 2 vote in favor was quickly taken. The bill moved to the Senate and could become law in less than two weeks.

I see a disturbing pattern developing in Michigan politics. In my opinion, if individuals get involved with legal, organized and timely opposition to an issue, politicians shouldn’t disenfranchise them by passing quickly-crafted and referendum-proof laws.

Think emergency manager. Think right to work. Think keep Michigan wolves protected. I am sorely disappointed by what I witnessed in Lansing.

PAT HARTSOE Grand Rapids

People should vote on hunting issues

In a deliberate attempt to circumvent the constitutional rights of the voters in Michigan, State Sen. Senator Tom Casperson (R-Escanaba) introduced Senate Bill-288 on April 9, 2013. It was approved by a 5 to 2 vote by the Natural Resources, Environment, and Great Lakes Committee and eventually goes to the Governor to be signed into law.

This bill would effectively nullify the efforts of a coalition of over 2,000 conservationists, Native American tribes, scientists and animal welfare interests who turned in more than 255,000 signatures from Michigan voters to place Public Act 520, listing wolves as a game species, to a referendum vote in November 2014.

SB 288 is an obvious attempt to prevent citizens from being able to conduct a constitutionally-guaranteed right to ballot referendum to reverse decisions by the legislature.

In 2006, Michigan voters overwhelmingly rejected a law to allow sport hunting of mourning doves – showing their desire to have the right to vote on wildlife issues. Voters rejected this, casting more votes against shooting doves than they did for any candidate that election. If SB 288 passes, this decisive outcome would be reversed.

SB 288 is a blatant display of political bullying that will put Michigan’s declining wolf population further at risk.

This bill is an extreme power grab by politicians and a deliberate attempt to subvert democracy and silence the voices of Michigan voters.

This type of political maneuvering by our elected officials must be stopped.

HARRY T. EDWARDS Kent City Wolf bill is an abuse of power

A few weeks ago, the Keep Michigan Wolves Protected campaign submitted over 255,000 signatures from registered Michigan voters opposed to sport hunting for wolves. This right to seek a voter referendum on legislation is guaranteed in the Michigan Constitution.

Unfortunately, the politicians in Lansing who most want to see wolves, recently introduced legislation (SB 288) which is exclusively aimed at nullifying this referendum and assuring that Michigan citizens never have a say again in hunting issues. This is not an exaggeration.

The legislation specifically removes all authority of citizens to have a voice about which animals are hunted in Michigan.

Even if you are in favor of hunting wolves, you should be very upset about this abuse of power. Drafting legislation specifically to silence Michigan voters who are following a constitutionally-guaranteed process is a stunning insult to democracy.

Please contact your state senator and state representative immediately and insist that they VOTE NO on SB 288.

TOM LYON New Era

People should decide on wolves

There is a new bill SB288 going through the State Senate this week that will take away all rights of the people of the state to make decisions on any wildlife.

Keep Michigan Wolves Protected collected and submitted 253,000 signatures from people around the state to put the upcoming wolf hunt on the Michigan Ballot in 11/2014. In the meantime, the hunt would be on hold until after the people voted.

Well, Sen. Tom Casperson submitted a bill this last week that would take all rights away from the citizens to have a say on any wildlife issues for all time. It would make the signatures mute, and silence the people and their wishes. This bill will change the constitution of the state and take away peoples voices on any wildlife issues.

He is upset because the wolf hunt which he had submitted, got the brakes put on it by the citizens of the state. So now he is attempting to take away all citizens rights when it comes to wildlife. People need to speak out.

They are changing a law that has been in place since 1908. And ballot proposals in the past that wanted to change our state constitution, were all readily defeated. This bill needs to be stopped. People need to contact their senators and reps……and quickly.  It could be law within eight days.

DOROTHY RODGERS Georgetown Township

Lawmakers not following will of the people

Not surprisingly, once again in our State legislature it appears that there is a “do as I say and not as I do” mentality. I am speaking in regard to SB 288 which is being fast tracked to a vote by State Sen. Tom Casperson R-Escanaba. This bill would sign legislation into law that would circumvent Michigan voter’s right to referendum, and includes a non-related appropriation that prevents the voters from rejecting the measure by referendum.

This bill, this is the good Senator’s response to the 253,000 signatures that were delivered to the Secretary of State in March, asking that another bill he was fast tracking; to allow a wolf hunt in Michigan, be put to Voter referendum in 2014.

Apparently Mr. Casperson, who prides himself on being a “sportsman” has no problem trying to write legislation that takes away Michigan voter rights when he doesn’t get his way. In this case, a trophy wolf hunt. This is truly unsportsmanlike conduct in the highest degree as the Senator has little or no regard for due process, let alone the opinions of 253,000 voters…..which was simply to let us decide whether a wolf hunt would be in the best interest of all of Michigan’s residents.

Regardless of how you feel about hunting, this bill works to undermine our right to referendum and to keep our lawmakers in check. I urge you, call or write your legislators and urge them to vote no on SB288.

MARGO BURIAN Grand Rapids”

**Special thanks to:  MLive/Grand Rapids Press guest opinion The Grand Rapids Press, for providing this information!     

Read Full Post »


wolf down

“Something’s not right in New Mexico. A federal agent with the notorious Wildlife Services agency is under investigation for killing a Mexican gray wolf. Adding to the misery, the government has been keeping this incident from the public.

It’s no surprise that Wildlife Services, part of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, is involved. This highly secretive agency has come under heavy fire over the past year because of the tens of thousands of animals it senselessly kills each year, often in the name of protecting livestock. Its methods are a lethal mix of medieval brutality and high-tech efficiency that include aerial gunning, trapping, deadly gases and poisons.

The agency was the focus of a recent blistering series in the Sacramento Bee that revealed the torturing of coyotes, the death of family pets and golden eagles — all done beneath the public’s radar. Members of Congress called for an investigation.

Help apparently didn’t come quick enough for the wolf in New Mexico.

The Southwest’s endangered Mexican gray wolves — with just three breeding pairs left in the wild — are hanging on by a thread in New Mexico and Arizona. The last thing they need is one of their own gunned down by an employee of the government that’s supposed to be nursing this wild population back to health.

Although the killing happened months ago, the public didn’t hear about it until it was reported in the Albuquerque Journal on Thursday afternoon. Government agencies, not surprisingly, have closed ranks and are refusing to talk about what happened.

Here’s what we’re piecing together: In January, a Wildlife Services employee apparently shot and killed a wolf, possibly a pup, while investigating the death of some livestock. The shooting evidently happened very close to the home range of the San Manteo wolf pack, which just added four pups to its family last year.

What’s more troubling about the latest incident in New Mexico is that the very agency that’s tasked with saving America’s wolves, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, apparently knew about the wolf killing but is refusing to say anything about it.

I can’t say it’s all that shocking. The Fish and Wildlife Service has long taken a lackluster approach to wolf recovery in New Mexico and Arizona.

Fifteen years after Mexican wolves were first reintroduced to the Southwest, there are only 75 wolves in the wild. Wildlife officials predicted in 1998 there would be more than 100 in the wild by 2006. The Fish and Wildlife Service hadn’t released a single wolf into the wild from its captive-breeding facilities in four years before one was finally let out earlier this year — only to be recaptured by government agents three weeks later.

Scientists believe the small Mexican wolf population is suffering from genetic inbreeding, with reduced litter size and pup survivorship.

But the apparent shooting of the wolf in New Mexico in January was more than bureaucratic indifference. It was an act of violence against an animal protected under the Endangered Species Act.

The government has correctly launched an investigation into what happened and we’ll be keen to see the results.

But one thing has already been made clear: By not coming out and talking about this incident publicly, these government agencies have  placed a veil of secrecy over the behavior of one of its own and the management of one of this nation’s flagship endangered species.

For anyone who cares about America’s wildlife, or accountability in their government, that should be unacceptable.”

**Special thanks to Kieran Suckling, Executive Director, Center for Biological Diversity, for providing this information in this article!

Read Full Post »


mexicanwolf

“Common sense writing on Montana wolves, I  thought  it was worth sharing.

Are you listening to their howls Governor Bullock? Wolves are treasured by real Montanans who care about wild places and wilderness. Be bold! Don’t listen to the crazy rhetoric, it’s not grounded in fact.

===

BOLD VISIONS CONSERVATION

This week’s Sunday Sermon Vol. 1  No. 2

Montana Governor Steve Bullock

and the politics of Wolves

 Stephen Capra

 There was a time when I use to think politics really mattered. I remember going to a rally for Senator Eugene McCarthy, as he ran for President in 1968, in Madison Square Garden, the energy and belief could really change our nation, or so I thought.

I really believed that democrats would change our country, by the end of that year our heart had been stolen by too many bullets, to many great leader’s had fallen. I think of that today with the state of affairs in Montana, a state led by ignorance, political pandering and a Governor who fancies himself progressive.

This all comes back to our heart being stolen. In this case it’s not men that have fallen, its wolves. I have watched as Montana shared in the magical return of wolves to Yellowstone, watched as tourists have flocked from around the world, watched in Lamar Valley as you could not estimate the price of cameras in a one-mile stretch, all focused on wolves. Since President Obama sold wolves out and the Endangered Species Act on a rider that ensured another Democrat would get re-elected, Senator Jon Tester, clear thinking shows us that faith in political leaders is very overrated.

Over the past few months the Montana Legislature, seemingly some of the most ill-informed, and job destroying group of people God ever put under one roof, spent the majority of their time trying to find new ways of killing wildlife. Spear-hunting was a hot topic, yes spear-hunting. Of course, new ways to kill, more jobs. Yet, when it came to wolves and bison, this group could not have enough blood on their hands. If it was not so heartbreaking, it would be funny. Listening to Montana Game and Fish talk about “responsibly harvesting” predators, none of it with any science worth discussing.

This is a group designed to kill animals, not protect. New bills are now being introduced. to allow silencers on guns to protect the precious ears of hunters; continuing to allow dead wolf members to be used as traps set to kill the rest of the family; making licenses easier and cheaper. New non-resident permits can be had for $50.

When Governor Bullock panders to the wolf hating bunch, he opens the door to killing more beautiful animals and their family units slaughtered by ignorance and by the ego that demands reelection. If Democrats do not have the guts to stand up for wolves, [by standing up I mean vocally,] publicly, and ignore the stupidity of state Game and Fish departments, there will be shooting in the dens of newborn pups. Introduction of strong and important protections for wolves must happen now and end the shameless pain of trapping once and for all. The Governor is aware that people come from all over the world (meaning serious tourist dollars) to observe wolves.

  The whining rancher scenario is a SNORE.

I believe in wolves, I love bison. I am sick and tired of Democrats that want only their reelection and refuse to acknowledge how important wildlife is to our humanity. I challenge them to causality.

 It amazes me that some people can feel nothing when confronted with wild animals. For me it is so magical, such a spiritual experience. I have seen grizzlies in the wild, wolves and bison. It is a gift; there is more than enough land to share. Throughout our history we have destroyed as a means of growth for man to feel magisterial.

 William Beebe said it so well, “When the last individual of a race of living things breaths no more, another heaven and earth must pass before such a one can begin again.”

 I was inspired in 1968. I look forward to being inspired once again, but my Democratic party and Governors like Bullock must become inspiring, must take chances, and must become a voice for those who cannot speak.

 Don’t be redundant Governor, wolves belong! Be BOLD!

Let your soul heal in the wild spirit that wolves bring to us. Amen!”

 

**And of course, special thanks goes to Stephen Capra and “Howling for Justice” for providing and sharing the information in this article!

Read Full Post »


three wolves

April 06, 2013 12:00 am

“Recently I attended a hearing in Helena where I heard numerous people,  including many in the state Legislature, asserting that wolves were “decimating”  Montana’s game herds. Unfortunately due to the widespread repetition of the lies  and distortions, the only thing being decimated is the truth.

According to MDFWP in 1992, three years before wolves were reintroduced into  Yellowstone and Idaho, there were an estimated 89,000 elk in Montana. By 2010,  elk had been so “decimated” that MDFWP estimated that elk numbers had grown to  140,000-150,000 animals.

Indeed, in 2012, according to MDFWP statistics, out of 127 elk management  units in the state, 68 are above objectives, 47 are at objectives, and only 12  are considered to be below objectives. And even among these 12 units, the causes  for elk declines are often complex and involve more than wolf predation. In at  least a few instances, overhunting by humans is the primary factor.

Beyond hunting, the presence of wolves has many other benefits. Wolves cull  sick animals such as those with brucellosis and Chronic Wasting Disease from  herds that could threaten both humans as well as livestock. Wolves shift  ungulates away from riparian areas, resulting in greater growth of willows and  other streamside vegetation. This, in turn, creates more habitat for wildlife  including songbirds, and beaver. Healthier riparian areas also results in  greater trout densities.

It is disturbing to me as a hunter and ecologist that MDFWP repeatedly fails  to aggressively counter the distortions and misinformation.

**Special thanks to George Wuerthner, for providing the information in this article! (http://billingsgazette.com/news/opinion/mailbag/article_357bf3f3-40aa-5bd1-90b5-0dfdf8c70446.html#.UWCFuBxtCGA.facebook)

 

 

Read Full Post »


Gray Wolf Pup

“During the 15 months the wolf known as OR7 has crisscrossed the Oregon-California border, the news from his birthplace back in Eastern Oregon has shaken the boots off some of those holding most tightly to deeply rooted misperceptions about the ability of wolves to coexist on the landscape with the rest of us.

In the two years since a lawsuit stopped the state of Oregon from killing wolves, the state’s fledgling wolf population has doubled to nearly 50. Yet in Wallowa County, where the majority of Oregon’s wolf-livestock conflicts are reported each year, fatal wolf attacks on livestock have fallen by 60 percent as ranchers and agencies were forced to rely on nonlethal conflict-prevention methods.

At the same time in neighboring Idaho, where over the last two years hunters, trappers and state agents have killed more than 700 wolves, the number of sheep and cattle killed by wolves increased by more than 75 percent.

In fact, those trends reflect exactly what biologists and wolf experts have been telling anyone who would listen since wolves became one of the first animals to be protected by the Endangered Species Act when it was passed, 40 years ago: Tried-and-true, centuries-old nonlethal wolf management techniques such as range-riding, livestock-guarding dogs and appropriate fencing greatly reduce predation by wolves on livestock.

And it reinforces the fact that killing wolves and leaving behind orphaned pups and dispersed packs actually increases the chances of livestock being killed, because once the order of the pack is destroyed, so is the natural pack discipline of teaching younger wolves to kill natural prey such as deer and elk, leaving lone wolves with no choice but to take down the easiest prey they can find to survive.

Those lessons come at a valuable time for Californians during the current public comment period, which ends in May, on whether we should protect wolves under the state Endangered Species Act.

It reminds us that as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service moves toward dropping federal protections for wolves in the lower 48 states, we have a great opportunity to build a wolf management plan that sets a national example of how wolves can coexist with human endeavors.

Wolf experts have long said California has hundreds of thousands of acres of excellent wolf habitat. Of course, California is also the nation’s most populated state and home to a thriving livestock industry of more than 6 million cattle and sheep.

With 163,000 square miles, California is the nation’s third-largest state, behind only Alaska and Texas. And that means we’re in a great position to share the land we’ve inherited with the species we purposefully killed off in California and many other western states.

The return of wolves to California is a promising event for many of us fortunate enough to make our home here in the Bear Republic, where the state flag, featuring an image of the state’s last known grizzly, says a lot about how we see ourselves.

Like residents of the other 49 states, we, too, are concerned about jobs, taxes, education, climate change and the length of our commutes.

But the people who make up our state’s ever-swelling population continue to represent Western ideals as old as the state, from an ongoing pioneer-style willingness to go where others have not, to a belief in fresh starts.

Even for wolves.

The arrival of OR7 in California in December 2011 shows it’s only a matter of time before wolves once again make their homes in our state. And given that animals live in ecosystems rather than states, whether OR7 decides to put down roots here is only a side issue in a much larger ecological evolution, one that wolf experts say will surely result in wolves returning permanently to California.

They’re coming – the question is, will we be ready to protect them?

Efforts to make sure those protections are in place were put in motion last fall when state officials recommended that California extend endangered species protections to OR7 and all that follow him. That recommendation will be ruled on in October.

In the meantime, let’s be clear: Recovering wolves to their historic range will take discipline and the acceptance that they, like the rest of us, have a right to be here. It won’t always be easy.

But as the mounting evidence from neighboring Oregon shows, it can be done and done well, if we’re willing.”

**Special thanks to Amaroq Weiss Special to The Bee, for providing the information in this article!

California resident Amaroq Weiss, a biologist and former attorney who has been working to recover wolves in the West for 16 years, is West Coast Wolf Organizer for the Center for Biological Diversity. Reach her at aweiss@biologicaldiversity.org

Read Full Post »


 

Arizona Republic, March 20, 2013 (posted 3/21/13) Letters to the Editor Needed!

By Brandon Loomis

“The Arizona Game and Fish Commission on Wednesday voted to back an effort by Western lawmakers to remove gray wolves from the endangered-species list.

The commission unanimously supported a letter by Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and Rep. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., asking the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to drop federal protections for wolves nationwide.

That would include Mexican gray wolves, which have struggled to find a foothold in the Southwest since reintroduction in 1998, though the commission reasserted its support for at least 100 “wolves on the ground.”

That’s a number that wolf supporters find unacceptable, and they don’t trust the state to nurse the animals to a fully recovered population.

But Hatch and Lummis, in their March 15 letter to Fish and Wildlife Service Director Dan Ashe, said that wolves are not endangered and that states don’t need federal meddling on the predators’ behalf.

“Unmanaged wolves are devastating to livestock and indigenous wildlife,” they wrote. “Currently, state wildlife officials have their hands tied any time wolves are involved.”

Commission Chairman Jack Husted said wolves in the northern Rocky Mountains — reintroduced in the 1990s, just like Arizona’s — have thrived to the point that they are damaging prey populations such as elk. Idaho, Wyoming and Montana have hosted more than 1,000 wolves between them for years. “We’ve time and again voiced our support for wild wolves on the ground (in Arizona),” Husted said, “but not in unlimited numbers.”

When federal officials released Mexican gray wolves from captive breeding programs into the mountains of eastern Arizona and western New Mexico, they discussed an initial goal of 100 animals.

They were unsure how many might actually be needed to support a perpetual population and left that prescription to be determined in a recovery plan that still has not been completed.

Although federal biologists this year reported a record number of wild Southwestern wolves — 75, split about evenly between the two states — wolf proponents say it’s nowhere near a safe number. They’re awaiting the recovery plan, which could designate new areas for reintroduction, such as the forests around the Grand Canyon.

Gray wolves’ legal status is complicated. Alaska’s plentiful packs have long been state-managed. Wolves brought from Canada to the northern Rockies, like those rebounding naturally in the upper Great Lakes states, have thrived to the point that federal officials have already dropped them from the endangered list.

But any that take up residence outside their official recovery zones — in eastern Utah, for instance — would enjoy full federal protection.

The Southwest’s wolves are physically the smallest North American subspecies and numerically the smallest population, and they remain legally protected from such actions as sport hunting.

Hatch and Lummis seek a blanket removal of federal oversight.

Sandy Bahr, director of the Sierra Club’s Grand Canyon chapter, said the commission would have more credibility in backing that move if the state had ever seriously supported wolf recovery.

“There’s no demonstration of commitment,” she said. Seventy-five animals don’t add up to success, she added. “Common sense tells you these are endangered animals.”

Defenders of Wildlife also condemned the commission’s vote, saying it defies polls that have shown that most Arizonans support wolf recovery.

This article was published in the Arizona Republic.
****************************************************************************************************************
Please write a letter to the editor today, thanking the paper for this article and opposing AZ Game and Fish Commission’s irresponsible position of support for delisting gray wolves nationally.
The letters to the editor page is one of the most widely read, influential parts of the newspaper. One letter from you can reach thousands of people and will also likely be read by decision-makers.  Tips for writing your letter are below, but please write in your own words, from your own experience.

Letter Writing Tips & Talking Points

Below are a few suggestions for ensuring your message gets through clearly-your letter will be most effective if you focus on a few key points, so don’t try to use all of these. If you need additional help or want someone to review your letter before you send it, email it to info@mexicanwolves.org.

Start by thanking paper for publishing this article. This makes your letter immediately relevant and increases its chances of being published.

Convey your outrage that once again the AZ Game and Fish Commission is attempting the undermine the survival of the Southwest’s native Mexican gray wolf. The Commission has a public trust responsibility to protect all of Arizona’s wildlife, especially endangered animals like the lobo. The Commissioners have betrayed that trust by advocating the removal of endangered species protections for wolves in all of the lower 48 states. It’s time they stopped trying to hinder the wolves’ recovery.

Remind readers that, at last count, just 75 Mexican gray wolves, including three breeding pairs, survived in the wild. These native wolves are critically endangered. New releases and additional populations of these wolves are desperately needed for them to thrive. Endangered species protections are critical to their survival. But AZ Game and Fish has consistently tried to undermine the wolves and will continue to do so if lobos become subject to state management.

Tell readers why you support wolves and stress that the majority of Arizona residents support wolves and understand their importance.   Polling done by Research and Polling, Inc. found 77 percent of Arizona respondents support the reintroduction of Mexican gray wolves. The poll also showed strong majority support for giving wolves greater protection under the Endangered Species Act. The Commission’s decision is an affront to the majority of Arizonans who value wolves and welcome the economic and ecosystem benefits they bring.

Convey how urgent it is for people to contact their elected officials in congress now to urge them to oppose national delisting of wolves. As the majority, we can make our voices heard above the commission if we reach out to our members of congress. Arizona letters can specifically thank Representatives Grijalva, Sinema, and Barber for their opposition to national delisting; they can also urge, by name, the other AZ Senators and Representatives who have not yet done so to step forward for wolves. Click here for information about members of Congress.

Talk about your personal connection to wolves and why the issue is important to you. If you’re a grandmother wanting your grandchildren to have the opportunity to hear wolves in the wild, or a hunter who recognizes that wolves make game herds healthier, or a businessperson who knows that wolves have brought millions in ecotourism dollars to Yellowstone, say so.

Describe the ecological benefits of wolves to entire ecosystems and all wildlife. Wildlife biologists believe that Mexican wolves will improve the overall health of the Southwest and its rivers and streams – just as the return of gray wolves to Yellowstone has helped restore balance to its lands and waters. Science has repeatedly demonstrated that wolves are keystone carnivores who help to keep wildlife like elk and deer healthy and bring balance to the lands they inhabit.

Keep your letter brief, between 150-200 words.

Provide your name, address, occupation, and phone number; your full address, occupation, and phone number will not be published, but they are required in order to have your letter published.”

**Special thanks to Brandon Loomis, http://www.mexicanwolves.org/index.php/news/937/51/In-the-News-Arizona-commission-backs-request-to-remove-wolves-from-endangered-list/d,News2) for providing the information in this article!

Read Full Post »


wolf hunted

“HAMILTON – There were at least 625 wolves in 147 packs with 37 breeding pairs roaming Montana’s wild lands at the end of 2012, according to figures released Thursday.

That’s the number of wolves that state wildlife managers were able to verify for certain for the federally required annual wolf conservation and management report.

The state’s annual minimum wolf count dropped by 4 percent in 2012. It was the first time that has happened since 2004.

The count doesn’t include 95 wolves killed statewide by hunters and trappers from Jan. 1 to Feb. 28 this year.

While the overall wolf count dropped statewide, the number of packs and breeding pairs increased slightly.

That’s what FWP wolf specialist Liz Bradley documented this year in the Bitterroot area as well.

“The overall numbers are down slightly from last year in the Bitterroot, but we are seeing a few more packs,” she said. “The pack sizes are smaller, which is what you might expect with hunting and trapping.”

The numbers in this report are a minimum count and don’t take into account all the wolves on the landscape, Bradley said.

“You should look at it for a trend,” she said. “It gives us an idea of what’s going on out there.”

Bradley documented 13 packs in the Bitterroot in 2012. That was up from 11 the year before.

At the same time, the annual minimum count dropped from 68 in 2011 to 59 in 2012.

Part of the decline in overall numbers could come from the loss of the Welcome Creek Pack in the northern reaches of the Bitterroot.

“It’s no longer there,” she said. “It got old and died and dispersed.”

Wolf numbers continue to hold steady in the East and West Fork areas, Bradley said.

***

This was the first year that Montana allowed people to trap wolves, which increased the annual harvest. Hunters took 128 wolves statewide and trappers killed another 97.

In Ravalli County, trappers took eight of the 14 wolves killed during the season that ended on Feb. 28.

“We’re making some progress,” said FWP Director Jeff Hagener. “Confirmed livestock loss has been on a general downward trend since 2009, and we have more tools now for affecting wolf populations.”

“In some areas, where hunting, trapping and livestock-depredation removals have been effective, it looks like the wolf population’s growth has been curbed this year,” he said. “In other areas, the population may be leveling off, but we have more work to do. There are still places where we need to manage for a better balance among other Montana wildlife and with Montana’s livestock populations.”

A total of 108 wolves were removed through agency control efforts in 2012 to prevent livestock loss. In 2011, 64 wolves were killed in similar actions.

Cattle losses from wolves were the lowest they’ve been in six years. Confirmed livestock depredations due to wolves were 67 cattle, 37 sheep, one dog, two horses and one llama in 2012.

The minimum federal recovery goals for wolves in the northern Rocky Mountains was set at a minimum of 30 breeding pairs and minimum of 300 wolves for three consecutive years. That goal was met in 2002.

The 2012 wolf population estimate for the Northern Rockies – which includes Wyoming, Idaho and Yellowstone Park – is expected to be available the second week of April from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at westerngraywolf.fws.gov.”

**Special thanks to Missoulian for providing this information!

 

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »